Using data from the 1996 and 2000 American National Election Studies, this article analyzes the behavior of voters who split their tickets, voting for one party’s presidential candidate and the opposing party’s House candidate, in presidential election years. We test the hypotheses that balancing behavior is likely to occur only when the outcome of the presidential election is relatively certain, and that balancing is most likely to occur among relatively sophisticated voters who have reservations about the policy positions of their preferred presidential candidate. The results of the study support the presence of this type of balancing behavior in the 1996 election and suggest that balancing can play an important role in producing divided government.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the US Electorate.”Journal of Politics60 (3): 634-652.
2.
Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Alvarez, Michael, and Matthew Schousen. 1993. “Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations: Testing the Intentional Models of Split Ticket Voting.”American Politics Quarterly21: 410-438.
4.
Bartels, Larry. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996.”American Journal of Political Science44: 35-50.
5.
Beck, Paul Allen, Lawrence Baum, Aage R. Clausen, and Charles E. Smith. 1992. “Patterns and Sources of Ticket Splitting in Subpresidential Voting.”American Political Science Review86: 1125-1142.
Born, Richard. 2000. “Policy Balancing Models and the Split-Ticket Voter, 1972-1996.”American Politics Research28 (2): 131-162.
8.
Burden, Barry C., and David C. Kimball. 1998. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.”American Political Science Review92: 533-544.
9.
Burden, Barry C., and David C. Kimball. 2002. Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 2004. “Policy Balancing and Preferences for Party Control of Government.”Political Research Quarterly57 (4): 541-550.
11.
Cover, Albert D., and David R. Mayhew. 1981. “Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections.” In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 2nd ed.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
Drew, Elizabeth. 1997. Whatever It Takes: The Real Struggle for Political Power in America. New York: Penguin.
13.
Erikson, Robert S.1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.”American Political Science Review66: 1234-1245.
14.
Erikson, Robert S.1988. “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss.”Journal of Politics50: 1011-1029.
15.
Fiorina, Morris P.1988. “The Reagan Years: Turning to the Right or Groping Toward the Middle?” In Barry Cooper, Allan Kornberg, and William Mishler, eds., The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
Fiorina, Morris P.1992. “An Era of Divided Government.”Political Science Quarterly107: 387-410.
17.
Fiorina, Morris P.1994. “Response to Born.”Legislative Studies Quarterly19: 117-125.
18.
Fiorina, Morris P.1996. Divided Government, 2nd ed.Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
19.
Frymer, Paul. 1994. “Ideological Consensus within Divided Party Government.”Political Science Quarterly109: 287-311.
20.
Garand, James, and Marci G. Lichtl. 1999. “Explaining Divided Government in the United States: Testing an Intentional Model of Split Ticket Voting.”British Journal of Political Science29 (3): 427-445.
21.
Ingerbman, Daniel, and John Villano. 1993. “An Institutional Theory of Divided Government and Party Polarization.”American Journal of Political Science37: 429-471.
22.
Jacobson, Gary C.1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U.S. House Elections, 1946-1988. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
Jacobson, Gary C.1991. “The Persistence of Democratic House Majorities.” In Gary Cox and Samuel Kernell, eds., The Politics of Divided Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24.
Kimball, David C.2004. “A Decline in Ticket Splitting and the Increasing Salience of Party Labels.” In Herbert F. Weisberg and Clyde Wilcox, eds., Models of Voting in Presidential Elections: The 2000 Election. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Nie, Norman, Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Quirk, Paul J., and Joseph Hinchcliffe. 1996. “Domestic Policy: The Trials of a Centrist Democrat.” In Colin Campbell and Bert A. Rockman, eds., The Clinton Presidency: First Appraisals. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
27.
Rohde, David W.1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Saunders, Kyle L., and Alan I. Abramowitz. 2004. “Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate.”American Politics Research (formerly American Politics Quarterly)32 (3): 285-309.
29.
Scheve, Kenneth, and Michael Tomz. 1999. “Electoral Surprise and the Midterm Loss in US Congressional Elections.”British Journal of Political Science29: 507-521.
30.
Stone, Walter J.1986. “The Carryover Effect in Presidential Elections.”American Political Science Review80: 271-280.
31.
Sundquist, James. 1988. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.”Political Science Quarterly103: 613-635.
32.
Wattenberg, Martin P.1991. “The Republican Presidential Advantage in the Age of Party Disunity.” In Gary Cox and Samuel Kernell, eds., The Politics of Divided Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
Wattenberg, Martin P.1994. The Decline of American Political Parties: 1952-1992. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Wilcox, Clyde. 1995. The Latest American Revolution? The 1994 Elections and Their Implications for Governance. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
