Using an agenda-setting approach, we show the interaction between the growth of groups and the growth of government. A pooled time-series analysis of more than 45,000 lobby registration reports from 1996 to 2000 and measures of government activity from the Policy Agendas Project indicates that groups become active in Washington, D.C., in large part because of pre-existing levels of government activity in the issue-areas that concern them. The growth in the range and number of activities of government has created incentives for organizations of all kinds to mobilize, whether they are supporters or opponents of new government programs. We find that levels of government attention in an issue-area explain the level of interest-group lobbying more consistently than does government spending or the number of business firms in that area. We conclude with a discussion of the need for theories of group mobilization to include attention to the demand-creating actions of government itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauer, Raymond A., Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis A. Dexter. 1963. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. New York: Atherton Press.
2.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones, eds. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Baumgartner, Frank R, Bryan D. Jones, and Michael C. MacLeod. 2000. “The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions.”Journal of Politics62: 321-349.
5.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1996. “The Multiple Ambiguities of ‘Counteractive Lobbying.’”American Journal of Political Science40: 521-542.
6.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 2001. “Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics.”Journal of Politics64: 1191-1213.
8.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Beth L. Leech, and Christine Mahoney. 2003. “The Co-Evolution of Groups and Government.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
9.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review89 (3): 634-647.
10.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models.”Political Analysis5: 1-36
11.
Buchanan, James, and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
12.
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies Create Citizens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Cigler, Allan J., and Anthony J. Nownes. 1995. “Public Interest Entrepreneurs and Group Patrons.” In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds., Interest Group Politics, 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
14.
Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Gray, Virginia, David Lowery, Matthew Fellowes, and Jennifer Anderson. Forthcoming. “Legislative Agendas and Mobilizers of Interest Advocacy: Understanding the Demand-Side of Lobbying in the American States.”American Politics Research.
16.
Grier, Kevin B., Michael C. Munger, and Brian E. Roberts. 1994. “The Determinants of Industry Political Activity, 1978-1986.”American Political Science Review88 (4): 911-926.
17.
Heinz, John P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H. Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. “Interest Groups’ Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone.”American Journal of Political Science41: 61-87.
19.
Hojnacki, Marie, and David Kimball. 1998. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.”American Political Science Review92: 775-790.
20.
Huckfeldt, R. Robert, and John Sprague. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.”American Political Science Review81: 1197-1216.
21.
Jones, Bryan D.1995. Reconceiving Decision making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Leech, Beth L. 1998. “Lobbying Strategies of American Interest Groups.” Ph.D. dissertation., Texas A&M University.
24.
Leech, Beth L., Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, and David C. Kimball. 2002. “Organized Interests and Issue Definition in Policy Debates.” In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds., Interest Group Politics, 6th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
25.
Lowery, David, Virginia Gray, Matthew Fellowes, and Jennifer Anderson. 2004. “Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Links Between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy.”Social Science Quarterly85 (2): 463-477.
26.
Martin, Cathie Jo.1995. “Nature or Nurture? Sources of Firm Preferences for National Health Reform.”American Political Science Review89: 898-913.
27.
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Olson, Mancur, Jr.1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Michael Lipsky. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Stimson, James A.1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.”American Journal of Political Science29 (4): 914-947.
31.
Tichenor, Daniel J, and Richard A. Harris. 2002/2003. “Organized Interests and American Political Development.”Political Research Quarterly117 (4): 587-612.
32.
Walker, Jack L., Jr.1983. “The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America.”American Political Science Review77: 390-406.
33.
Walker, Jack L., Jr.1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
