Core Values,Value Conflict,and Citizens’ Ambivalence about Gay Rights

Abstract

Recent research has recognized that many people simultaneously hold positive and negative attitudes about important political issues. In this article, we review the concept of attitudinal ambivalence and propose a survey-based measure of ambivalence adapted from the experimental literature. Extending our earlier work on abortion, analysis of a statewide telephone survey of Florida residents reveals that (1) many people have ambivalent attitudes about issues related to gay and lesbian rights; (2) the amount of ambivalence varies according to the specific rights in question (military service, gay marriage and adoption, membership in youth organizations such as Boy Scouts, and others); (3) ambivalence on gay rights is to some extent a function of conflict among citizens’ underlying core values; and (4) under certain circumstances, ambivalence appears to mediate the relationship between a person’s issue preferences with regard to gay rights and his or her evaluation of political leaders and institutions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abelson, Robert P. 1988. “Conviction.” American Psychologist 43: 267-275.

Abramson, Paul R. , and Charles W. Ostrom . 1994. “Question Wording and Partisanship: Change and Continuity in Party Loyalties During the 1992 Election Campaign.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 21-48.

Alvarez, R. Michael , and John Brehm . 1995. “American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 1055-1082.

Alvarez, R. Michael , and John Brehm . 1997. “Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies?” American Journal of Political Science 41: 345-374.

Alvarez, R. Michael , and John Brehm . 2002. Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information, and American Public Opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

American Association for Public Opinion Research . 2000. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: AAPOR.

Armitage, Christopher J. , and Mark Conner . 2000. “Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 1421-1432.

Bassili, John N. 1996. “Meta-Judgmental Versus Operative Indexes of Psychological Attributes: The Case of Measures of Attitude Strength.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 637-653.

Brewer, Paul R. 2003. “The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion about Gay Rights.” Journal of Politics 65: 1208-1220.

10.

Cacioppo, John T. , Wendi Gardner , and Gary G. Berntson . 1997. “Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 1: 3-25.

11.

Cain, Bruce E. , D. Roderick Kiewiet , and Carole J. Uhlaner . 1991. “The Acquisition of Partisanship by Latinos and Asian Americans.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 390-422.

12.

Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In David E. Apter , ed., Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206-261. New York: The Free Press.

13.

Converse, Philip E. 1970. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In Edward R. Tufte , ed., The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, pp. 168-189. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

14.

Craig, Stephen C. , James G. Kane , and Michael D. Martinez . 2002. “Sometimes You Feel Like a Nut, Sometimes You Don’t: Citizens’ Ambivalence About Abortion.” Political Psychology 23: 285-301.

15.

Craig, Stephen C. , and Michael D. Martinez , eds. 2005 Ambivalence and the Structure of Political Opinion. New York: Palgrave.

16.

Craig, Stephen C. , Michael D. Martinez , and James G. Kane . 2005. “Ambivalence and Response Instability: A Panel Study.” In Stephen C. Craig and Michael D. Martinez , eds., Ambivalence and the Structure of Political Opinion, pp. 55-71. New York: Palgrave.

17.

Crespi, Irving . 1988. Pre-Election Polling: Sources of Accuracy and Error. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

18.

Eagly, Alice H. , and Shelly Chaiken . 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

19.

Epstein, Leon D. 1964. “Electoral Decision and Policy Mandate: An Empirical Example.” Public Opinion Quarterly 28: 564-572.

20.

Feldman, Stanley . 1988. “Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 416-440.

21.

Feldman, Stanley , and John Zaller . 1992. “The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 268-307.

22.

Finkel, Steven E. , Thomas M. Guterbock , and Marian J. Borg . 1991. “Race-of-Interviewer Effects in a Preelection Poll.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55: 313-330.

23.

Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

24.

Gross, Sharon Ruth , Rolf Holtz , and Norman Miller . 1995. “Attitude Certainty.” In Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick , eds., Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, pp. 215-245. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

25.

Haddock, Geoffrey . 2003. “Making a Party Leader Less of a Party Member: The Impact of Ambivalence on Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Political Party Attitudes.” Political Psychology 24: 769-780.

26.

Haeberle, Steven H. 1999. “Gay and Lesbian Rights: Emerging Trends in Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Ellen D. B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock , eds., Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process: Public Policy, Public Opinion, and Political Representation, pp.146-169. New York: Columbia University Press.

27.

Herek, Gregory M. 2002. “Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66: 40-66.

28.

Herek, Gregory M. , and John P. Capitanio . 1996. “‘Some of My Best Friends’: Intergroup Contact, Concealable Stigma, and Heterosexuals’ Attitudes toward Gay Men and Lesbians.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 412-424.

29.

Horton, Nicholas J. , and Stuart R. Lipsitz . 2001. “Multiple Imputation in Practice: Comparison of Software Packages for Regression Models with Missing Variables.” The American Statistician 55: 244-254.

30.

Jacoby, William G. 2002. “Core Values and Political Attitudes.” In Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox , eds., Understanding Public Opinion, 2nd ed., pp.177-201. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

31.

Kaplan, Kalman J. 1972. “On the Ambivalence-Indifference Problem in Attitude Theory and Measurement: A Suggested Modification of the Semantic Differential Technique.” Psychological Bulletin 77: 361-372.

32.

Katz, Irwin , and R. Glen Hass . 1988. “Racial Ambivalence and American Value Conflict: Correlational and Priming Studies of Dual Cognitive Structures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 893-905.

33.

Krosnick, Jon A. , and Robert P. Abelson . 1992. “The Case for Measuring Attitude Strength in Surveys.” In Judith M. Tanur , ed., Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, pp.177-203. New York: Russell Sage.

34.

Lavine, Howard . 2001. “The Electoral Consequences of Ambivalence Toward Presidential Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 915-929.

35.

Lewis, Gregory B. , and Marc A. Rogers . 1999. “Does the Public Support Equal Employment Rights for Gays and Lesbians?” In Ellen D. B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock , eds., Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process: Public Policy, Public Opinion, and Political Representation, pp. 118-145. New York: Columbia University Press.

36.

McCann, James A. 1997. “Electoral Choices and Core Value Change: The 1992 Presidential Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 564-583.

37.

McGraw, Kathleen M. , Edward Hasecke , and Kimberly Conger . 2003. “Ambivalence, Uncertainty, and Processes of Candidate Evaluation.” Political Psychology 24: 421-448.

38.

Meffert, Michael F. , Michael Guge , and Milton Lodge . 2000. “Good, Bad, Indifferent and Ambivalent: The Consequences of Multidimensional Political Attitudes.” In William E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman , eds., The Issue of Belief: Essays in the Intersection of Non-Attitudes and Attitude Change, pp.69-100. Amsterdam: The Amsterdam School of Communication Research, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

39.

Newby-Clark, Ian R. , Ian McGregor , and Mark P. Zanna . 2002. “Thinking and Caring About Cognitive Inconsistency: When and For Whom Does Attitudinal Ambivalence Feel Uncomfortable?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 157-166.

40.

Osgood, Charles E. , George J. Suci , and Percy H. Tannenbaum . 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

41.

Peffley, Mark , Pia Knigge , and Jon Hurwitz . 2001. “A Multiple Values Model of Political Tolerance.” Political Research Quarterly 54: 379-406.

42.

Pelham, Brett W. 1991. “On Confidence and Consequences: The Certainty and Importance of Self-Knowledge.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 518-530.

43.

Petty, Richard E. , and John T. Cacioppo . 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Leonard Berkowitz , ed., Advances In Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 123-205. New York: Academic Press.

44.

Priester, Joseph R. , and Richard E. Petty . 1996. “The Gradual Threshold Model of Ambivalence: Relating the Positive and Negative Bases of Attitudes to Subjective Ambivalence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 431-449.

45.

Sherrill, Kenneth , and Alan Yang . 2000. “From Outlaws to In-Laws.” Public Perspective. 11: 20-23.

46.

Sniderman, Paul M. , Philip E. Tetlock , and Laurel Elms . 2001. “Public Opinion and Democratic Politics: The Problem of Nonattitudes and the Social Construction of Political Judgment.” In James H. Kuklinski , ed., Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, pp. 254-288. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

47.

Steenbergen, Marco R. , and Paul R. Brewer . 2000. “The Not-So-Ambivalent Public: Policy Attitudes in the Political Culture of Ambivalence.” In Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman , eds., The Issue of Belief: Essays in the Intersection of Non-Attitudes and Attitude Change, pp. 101-142. Amsterdam: The Amsterdam School of Communication Research, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

48.

Thompson, Megan , Mark P. Zanna , and Dale W. Griffin . 1995. “Let’s Not Be Indifferent About (Attitudinal) Ambivalence.” In Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick , eds., Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, pp. 361-386. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

49.

Tygart, C. E. 2000. “Genetic Causation Attribution and Public Support of Gay Rights.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12: 259-275.

50.

Wald, Kenneth D. 2000. “The Context of Gay Politics.” In Craig A. Rimmerman , Kenneth D. Wald , and Clyde Wilcox , eds., The Politics of Gay Rights, pp. 1-28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

51.

Whitley, Bernard E. , and Sarah E. Lee . 2000. “The Relationship of Authoritarianism and Related Constructs to Attitudes Toward Homosexuality.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30: 144-170.

52.

Wilcox. Clyde , and Barbara Norrander . 2002. “Of Moods and Morals: The Dynamics of Opinion on Abortion and Gay Rights.” In Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox , eds., Understanding Public Opinion, 2nd ed., pp. 121-147. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

53.

Wilcox, Clyde , and Robin Wolpert . 2000. “Gay Rights in the Public Sphere: Public Opinion on Gay and Lesbian Equality.” In Craig A. Rimmerman , Kenneth D. Wald , and Clyde Wilcox , eds., The Politics of Gay Rights, pp. 409-432. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

54.

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

55.

Zaller, John , and Stanley Feldman . 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 579-616.