“Hybridity” has become a popular concept among scholars of critical race theory and identity, particularly those studying Chicano identity. Some scholars claim that hybridity—premised on multiplicity and fluidity—represents a new approach to subjectivity, challenging the idea of a stable and unified subject. In “Patrolling Borders,” I argue that scholars are mistaken in their belief that “hybrid” or “bordered” identities are inherently transgressive or antiessentialist. By constructing a genealogy of Chicano hybridity (i.e., mestizaje) I show how Chicano nationalists produced a politicized subjectivity during the Chicano Movement that emerged as the basis for recent notions of hybridity put forward by writers like Gloria Anzaldúa. By tracing the historical construction of mestizaje, I show how hybridity continues to be a discursive practice capable of comfortably coexisting with dreams of privileged knowledge, order, and wholeness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alarcón, Norma. 1990. “Chicana Feminism: In the Tracks of ‘The’ Native Woman.”Cultural Studies4: 248-256.
2.
Alurista. 1969 [1989]. El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán. Reprinted in Aztlan: Essays on the Chicano Homeland. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
3.
Anaya, Rudolfo, and Francisco Lomeli. 1989. “Introduction.” In Rudolfo Anaya and Francisco Lomeli, eds., Aztlán: Essays on the Chicano Homeland. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
4.
Andouard-Labarthe, Elyette. 1990. “The Vicissitudes of Aztlán.”Confluencia (5): 79-84.
5.
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
6.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 1991. “Is the Post-in Post-modernism the Post-in Post-colonial?”Critical Inquiry17 (Winter): 336-357.
Bar On, Bat-Ami. 1993. “Marginality and Epistemic Privilege.” In Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, eds., Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
9.
Bruce-Novoa, Juan. 1982. Chicano Poetry: A Response toChaos. Austin: University of Texas Press.
10.
Crosby, Christine. 1992. “Dealing with Differences.” In Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, eds., Feminists Theorize The Political. New York: Routledge.
11.
El Plan Espiritual de Aztlán. 1989 [1969]. Reprinted in Rudolfo Anaya and Francisco Lomeli, eds., Aztlán: Essays on the Chicano Homeland. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
12.
El Plan de Santa Barbara. 1989 [1969]. Reprinted in Carlos Muñoz, Jr.’s, Youth, Identity, Power: The Chicano Movement. New York: Verso.
13.
Flax, Jane. 1992. “The End of Innocence.” In Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, eds., Feminists Theorize The Political. New York: Routledge.
14.
Fregoso, Rosa Linda, and Angie Chabram. 1990. “Chicana/o Cultural Representations: Reframing Alternative Critical Discourses.”Cultural Studies4: 267-281.
15.
García, Alma. 1997. Chicana Feminist Thought: The Basic Historical Writings. New York: Routledge.
16.
Gonzales, Rodolfo. 1972 [1967]. I Am Joaquín/Yo Soy Joaquín. New York: Bantam.
17.
Nancy Hartsock, 1985. Money, Sex and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
18.
Hill-Collins, Patricia. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
19.
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Klor de Alva, J. Jorge. 1986. “California Chicano Literature and Pre-Columbian Motifs: Foil and Fetish.”Confluencia (2): 18-26.
21.
Klor de Alva, J. Jorge. 1989. “Aztlán, Borinquen and Hispanic Nationalism.” In Rudolfo Anaya and Francisco Lomeli, eds., Aztlán: Essays on the Chicano Homeland. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
22.
Leal, Luis. 1989. “In Search of Aztlán.” In Rudolfo Anaya and Francisco Lomeli, eds., Aztlán: Essays on the Chicano Homeland. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
23.
Michaelsen, Scott, and David E. Johnson. 1997. “Border Secrets: An Introduction.” In Scott Michaelsen and David E. Johnson, eds., Border Theory: The Limits of Cultural Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
Moraga, Cherríe.1983. Loving in the War Years: Lo que nunca pasó por sus labios. Boston, MA: South End Press.
25.
Muñoz, Carlos. 1989. Youth, Identity, Power: The Chicano Movement. New York: Verso.
26.
Pérez-Torres, Rafael. 1995. Movements in Chicano Poetry: Against Myths, Against Margins. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Phelan, Shane. 1994. Getting Specific: Postmodern Lesbian Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
Sandoval, Chela. 1995. “Feminist Forms of Agency and Oppositional Consciousness: U.S. Third World Feminist Criticism.” In Judith Kegan Gardiner, ed., Provoking Agents: Gender and Agency in Theory and Practice. Urbana: Universitiy of Illinois Press.
29.
Scott, Joan. 1992. “Experience.” In Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, eds., Feminists Theorize The Political. New York: Routledge.
30.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1989. “Who Claims Alterity?” In Barbara Kruger and Phil Mariani, eds., Remaking History. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
31.
Stavans, Ilan. 1995. The Hispanic Condition: Reflections on Culture & Identity in America. New York: HarperCollins.
32.
Vasconcelos, José. 1926. La Raza Cósmica. Mexico City: Aguilar S.A. de Ediciones.
33.
Wright, Melissa. 1998. “Maquiladora Mestizas and a Feminist Border Politics: Revisiting Anzaldúa.”Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy13 (3): 114-131.
