Despite the fact that domestic and foreign corporations, along with trade associations, are some of the most politically active groups in the United States, earlier research has identified a substantial number of firms that are politically inactive. Using fresh data collected from the 2000 election cycle for the Fortune 1000 and the Forbes top foreign investors, we examine business soft money, lobbying expenditures, as well as PAC contributions, in exploring economic, institutional, and political factors that might explain the choice of political activity or inactivity. This article goes beyond earlier research in several ways. Previous research has focused on PAC contributions rather than a fuller range of activities, and it has not included association political activity in the analysis of firm-level behavior. Also, the influence of other actors in the political system, notably environmental and citizen groups, has not been systematically examined. Theoretically, these data allow us to examine the countervailing power thesis, the institutionalists’ arguments about the nature of foreign business behavior, and the unexplored collective action questions that business associational activity poses—are firm and associational activities complements or substitutes?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ainsworth, Scott H.2002. Analyzing Interest Groups: Group Influence on People and Policies. New York: Norton.
2.
Alt, James, Fredrik Carlsen, Per Heum, and Kare Johansen. 1999. “Asset Specificity and the Political Behavior of Firms.”International Organization53 (Winter): 99-116
3.
Andres, Gary. 1985. “Business Involvement in Campaign Finance: Factors Influencing the Decision to Form a Corporate PAC.”PS: Political Science & Politics18 (Spring): 215-219.
4.
Austen-Smith, David, and John R. Wright. 1994. “Counteractive Lobbying.”American Journal of Political Science38 (February): 25-44.
5.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
Boies, John L.1989. “Money, Business, and the State: Material Interests, Fortune 500 Corporations, and the Size of Political Action Committees.”American Sociological Review54 (October): 821-833.
7.
Choate, Pat. 1990. Agents of Influence: How Japan’s Lobbyists in the United States Manipulate America’s Political and Economic System. New York: Knopf.
8.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Fred L. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
9.
Forbes. 2000. “The 100 Largest Foreign Investments In The U.S.”New York: Forbes.
10.
Forbes. 2000. “The Fortune 1000 The Largest U.S. Corporations.”New York: Time.
11.
Galbraith, John K.1954. “Countervailing Power.”The American Economic Review44: 1-6.
12.
Grier, Kevin B., Michael C. Munger, and Brian E. Roberts. 1994. “The Determinates of Industry Political Activity, 1978-1986.”American Political Science Review88 (December): 911-926.
13.
Hansen, Wendy L., and Neil J. Mitchell. 2000. “Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics.”American Political Science Review94 (December): 891-903.
14.
Hart, David M.2001. “Why Do Some Firms Give? Why Do Some Give a Lot?”Journal of PoliticsNovember63: 1230-1249.
15.
Humphries, Craig. 1991. “Corporations, PACs and the Strategic Link between Contributions and Lobbying Activities.”Western Political Quarterly44 (June): 353-372.
16.
Jordan, Grant. 1990. “The Pluralism of Pluralism: An Anti-Theory?”Political Studies38: 286-301.
17.
Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1996. The Cooperator’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
Masters, Marick F., and Gerald D. Keim. 1985. “Determinants of PAC Participation Among Large Corporations.”Journal of Politics47 (November): 1158-1173.
19.
Mitchell, Neil J.1997. The Conspicuous Corporation: Business, Public Policy, and Representative Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20.
Mitchell, Neil J., Wendy Hansen, and Eric Jepsen. 1997. “The Determinants of Domestic and Foreign Corporate Political Activity.”Journal of Politics59 (November): 1096-1113.
21.
North, Douglass. 1997. “Prologue.” In John N. Drobak and John V. C. Nye, eds.. The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics pp. 3-12. San Diego: Academic Press.
22.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Quinn, Dennis P., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1991. “Business and Political Power: The Case of Taxation.”American Political Science Review85: 11-29.
24.
Rehbein, Kathleen. 1995. “Foreign-owned Firms’ Campaign Contributions in the United States: An Exploratory Study.”Policy Studies Journal23: 41-61.
25.
Sabato, Larry. 1984. PAC Power. New York: Norton.
26.
Schlozman, Kay L., and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
27.
Schuler, Douglas A., Kathleen Rehbein, and Roxy D. Cramer. 2002. “Pursuing Strategic Advantage Through Political Means: A Multivariate Approach.”Academy of Management Journal.
28.
Smith, M. J.1990. “Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neopluralism: The Role of Pressure Groups in Policy-Making.”Political Studies38: 286-301.
29.
Smith, Mark. 2000. American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Stigler, George J.1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2 (Spring): 3-26.
31.
Su, Tie-ting, Alan Neustadtl, and Dan Clawson. 1995. “Business and the Conservative Shift: Corporate PAC Contributions, 1976-86.”Social Science Quarterly76 (March): 20-40.
32.
Tolchin, Martin, and Susan Tolchin. 1988. Buying into America: How Foreign Money Is Changing the Face of Our Nation. New York: Times Books.
33.
Truman, David. 1951. The Government Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.
34.
Vogel, David. 1989. Fluctuating Fortunes. New York: Basic Books WESTLAW. Electronic data base service. St. Paul, MN: West Group. http://www.westlaw.com.
35.
Wilson, Graham, K.1990. “Corporate Political Strategies.”British Journal of Political Science20 (April): 281-288.
36.
Wilson, Graham, K.2003. Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Chatham House.
37.
Wilson, James Q.1981. “Democracy and the Corporation.” In Robert Hessen, ed., Does Big Business Rule America? Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
38.
Wright, John R.1990. “Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.”American Political Science Review84 (June): 417-438.
