Mobilizing African-American Voters Using Direct Mail and Commercial Phone Banks: A Field Experiment

Abstract

This essay summarizes the results of a large-scale randomized experiment conducted during the 2000 election campaign by the NAACP National Voter Fund, which sought to mobilize African-American voters. Focusing solely on the direct mail and phone banking components of the NAACP-NVF campaign, this study examines the voting behavior of 980,208 participants residing in single-voter households, 1.7 percent of whom were randomly assigned to a control group. The experiment permits us to estimate (1) the extent to which the National Voter Fund’s phone calls and direct mail increased voter turnout and (2) the approximate cost per vote. Within this sample, the NVF’s two pieces of GOTV mail, three live phone calls, and two recorded phone calls had modest effects, generating approximately 7,100 additional votes at $158 per vote. The upper bound of a 90 percent confidence interval puts these figures at 16,214 additional votes at $69 per vote.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, William C. , and Dennis J. Smith . 1980. “Effects of Telephone Canvassing on Turnout and Preferences: A Field Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (Autumn): 389-395.

Angrist, Joshua D. , Guido W. Imbens , and Donald B. Rubin . 1996. “Identification of Casual Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (June): 444-455.

Blumberg, Melanie J. , William C. Binning , and John C. Green . 1999. “Do the Grassroots Matter? The Coordinate Campaign in a Batttleground State.” In John C. Green and Daniel M. Shea , eds., The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Blumberg, Melanie J. , William C. Binning , and John C. Green . Forthcoming. “No Mo[mentum] in Ohio: Local Parties and the 2000 Presidential Campaign. In John C. Green and Rick D. Farmer , eds., The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties, 4th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Carton, Paul . 1984. Mobilizing the Black Community: The Effects of Personal Contact Campaigning on Black Voters. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political Studies.

Gerber, Alan S. , and Donald P. Green . 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Direct Mail, and Telephone Contact on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94: 653-663.

Gerber, Alan S. , and Donald P. Green . 2001. “Do Phone Calls Increase Turnout?” Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (Spring): 75-85.

Gerber, Alan S. , Donald P. Green , and Matthew N. Green . 2003. “The Effects of Partisan Direct Mail on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies 22: 563-579.

Green, Donald P. , and Alan S. Gerber . 2004. Get Out the Vote!: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

10.

Green, Donald P. , Alan S. Gerber , and David W. Nickerson . 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” Journal of Politics (in press).

11.

Krassa, Michael A. 1988. “Context and the Canvass: The Mechanisms of Interaction.” Political Behavior 10 (3): 233-246.

12.

Leighley, Jan E. 2001. Strength in Numbers? The Political Mobilization of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

13.

McNulty, John E. 2003. “Partisan Get-Out-The-Vote Drives and Turnout.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 3-6, Chicago.

14.

Michelson, Melissa R. 2003. “Getting Out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-Door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, March 22-24, Long Beach.

15.

Weilhouwer, Peter W. 2000. “Releasing the Fetters: Parties and the Mobilization of the African-American Electorate.” Journal of Politics 62 (1): 206-222.

16.

Wong, Janelle . 2003. “Getting out the Vote among Asian Americans in Los Angeles County: A Field Experiment.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28-31, Philadelphia.