The power of the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional remains as troubling today as when first introduced in Marbury v. Madison. While the normative arguments will perhaps always remain unsettled, the empirical question of when and how often justices actually use this power also continues unanswered. Using data derived from briefs filed by litigants over ten terms, we develop systematic tests of how requests for judicial review of state and federal laws influence U.S. Supreme Court justices. We find that while many appear to base their decisions to strike or uphold state or federal laws on ideological considerations, the Court itself can be called restraintist in that it never appears to strike laws sua sponte, and most requests for the review are voted down. Finally, we find little evidence of strategic considerations in the justices’ decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allan, James. 1996. “Bills of Rights and Judicial Power—A Liberal’s Quandary.”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies16: 337-337
2.
Ashwander v. TVA, 297 U.S. 288 (1936).
3.
Balkin, Jack M.2001. “Bush v. Gore and the Boundary Between Law and Politics.”Yale Law Journal110: 1450-1458.
4.
Baum, Lawrence. 1997The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bergara, Mario, Barak Richman, and Pablo T. Spiller. 2003. Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint. Legislative Studies Quarterly28: 247-280.
7.
Bork, Robert. 1971. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.”Indiana Law Journal47: 1-1
8.
Boucher, Robert, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1995. “Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Offensive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court.”Journal of Politics57: 824-837.
9.
Brenner, Saul, and John F. Krol. 1989. Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court. Journal of Politics51: 82841-82841.
10.
Bush v. Gore, 121 S. Ct. 525 (2000).
11.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Donald J. McCrone1982. “Of Time and Judicial Activism: A Study of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1800-1973.” In Stephen C. Halpern and Charles M. Lamb, Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
12.
Commager, Henry Steele. 1943. Majority Rule and Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Comisky, Michael. 1995. “Can Presidents Pack the Supreme Court?”Congress and the Presidency22: 19-33.
14.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. Choices Justices Make. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
15.
Epstein, Lee, and Joseph F. Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
16.
Ferejohn, John, and Charles Shipan. 1990. “Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy.”Journal of Law Economics and Organization6: 1-20.
17.
Franck, Matthew J.1996. Against the Imperial Judiciary: The Supreme Court vs. the Sovereignty of the People. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18.
Eskridge, William N., Jr.1991. “ Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.”California Law Review79: 613-684.
19.
George, Tracey E., and Lee Epstein. 1992. “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making.”American Political Science Review86: 323-337.
20.
Gibson, James L.1978. “Judges’ Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model.”American Political Science Review72: 911-924.
21.
Gibson, James L.1983. “From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior.”Political Behavior5: 749-749.
22.
Grossman, Joel B.1962. “Role Playing and the Analysis of Judicial Behavior: The Case of Mr. Justice Frankfurter.”Journal of Public Law11: 285-309.
23.
Halpern, Stephen C., and Charles M. Lamb, eds. 1982. Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
24.
Hand, Learned. 1959. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Kairys, David. 2001. “Bush v. Gore Blues.”Jurist: The Legal Education Network. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumnew23.htm
26.
Kort, Fred. 1963. “Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions and Rules of Law.” In Glendon Schubert, ed., Judicial Decision Making. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
27.
Lee v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, 505 U.S. 830 (1992).
28.
Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
29.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
30.
Marks, Brian A. 1988. A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell. Working papers in Political Science, P-88-7, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
31.
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, (1932).
32.
Noonan, John T.2002. Narrowing The Nation’s Power: The Supreme Court Sides With The States. Berkeley: University of California Press
33.
O’Connor, Karen. 1983. The Amicus Curiae Role of the U.S. Solicitor General in Supreme Court Litigation. Judicature66: 25664-25664.
34.
Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970).
35.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
36.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
37.
Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.
38.
Segal, Jeffrey A.1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts.”Western Political Quarterly41: 13544-13544.
39.
Segal, Jeffrey A.1999. “Supreme Court Deference to Congress: An Examination of the Marksist Model,” pp. 237-253. In Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds., Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Albert D. Cover. 1989. “Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.”American Political Science Review83: 55765-55765.
41.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge.
42.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1995.” Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited.”Journal of Politics57: 812-823.
44.
Songer, Donald R., and Susan Haire. 1992. “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals.”American Journal of Political Science36: 963-982.
45.
Spaeth, Harold J.1964. “The Judicial Restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter—Myth or Reality.”Midwest Journal of Political Science8: 22-38.
46.
Spaeth Harold J., and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. “The U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Data Base: Providing New Insights into the Court.”Judicature83: 228-235.
47.
Spaeth, Harold, and Stuart Teger. 1982. “Activism and Restraint: A Cloak for the Justices’ Policy Preferences.” In Stephen C. Halpern and Charles M. Lamb, eds., Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
48.
Spiller, Pablo, and Rafael Gely. 1992. “Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor Decisions: 1949/1987.”Rand Journal of Economics (23): 463-463.
49.
Stern, Robert L., Eugene Gressman, and Stephen M. Shapiro. 1986. Supreme Court Practice, 6th ed.Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
50.
Thayer, James Bradley. 1893. “Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law.”Harvard Law Review7: 133-133.
51.
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Ulmer, S. Sidney. 1972. “The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator to Decision ‘On the Merits’”. Polity4: 429-429.
53.
U.S. v. Morrison, et al., 529 U.S.598 (2000).
54.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies13: 18-18.
55.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1998. “Judicial Review and the Conditions for Democracy.”Journal of Political Philosophy6: 335-335.
56.
Wechsler, Herbert. 1961. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” In Herbert Wechsler, ed., Principles, Politics, and Fundamental Law: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
Zorn, Christopher. 2001. “Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications.”American Journal of Political Science45: 470-490.
