This article provides a critical review of empirical research on attitudes toward abortion among mass publics in the United States, with a view toward suggesting promising avenues for future research. We identify three such themes: Accounting for pro-life movement among mass attitudes in recent years, when the composition of the U.S. population would seem to trend in a pro-choice direction; explaining the sources of party polarization of the abortion issue; and anticipating changes in abortion attitudes which might result from public debate over human cloning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan. 1995. “It’s Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.”Journal of Politics57: 176-186.
2.
Adams, Greg D.1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.”American Journal of Political Science41: 718-737.
3.
Alvarez, R. Michael, and John Brehm. 1995. “American Ambivalence Toward Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values.”American Journal of Political Science39: 1055-1082.
4.
Bishop, G., R. Olendick, and A. Tuckfarber. 1985. “The Importance of Replicating a Failure to Replicate: Order Effects on Abortion Items.”Public Opinion Quarterly49: 105-114.
5.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.”American Political Science Review79: 78-91.
6.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1999. “A Dynamic Model of Political Change Among Party Activists.”Political Behavior21: 17-41.
7.
Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 1999. “Changing Parties or Changing Attitudes? Uncovering the Partisan Change Process.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April.
8.
Condit, Celeste Michele. 1989. Decoding Abortion Rhetoric. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
Converse, Philip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In David Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent, pp. 106-161. New York: Free Press.
10.
Converse, Philip E., and Gregory Markus. 1979. “’Plus ca Change….’ The New CPS Panel Study.”American Political Science Review73: 32-49.
11.
Coombs, Michael, and Susan Welch. 1982. “Blacks, Whites, and Attitudes Toward Abortion.”Public Opinion Quarterly46: 510-520.
12.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1993a. “State Political Cultures and Public Opinion About Abortion.”Political Research Quarterly46: 771-781.
14.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1993b. “Generational Differences in Attitudes Toward Abortion.”American Politics Quarterly21: 31-53.
15.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1993c. “Measuring Abortion Attitudes: Methodological and Substantive Lessons From the CBS/New York Times Surveys.”Family Planning Perspectives25: 118-121, 145-145.
16.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1993d. “Catholicism and Abortion Attitudes in the American States: A Contextual Analysis.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion32: 375-383.
17.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1994a. “Issue Voting in U.S. Senate Elections: The Abortion Issue in 1990.”Congress and the Presidency21: 99-112.
18.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1994b. “Issue Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: Abortion and Post-Webster Politics.”Journal of Politics56: 187-199.
19.
Davis, Nancy J., and Robert V. Robinson. 1996. “Are Rumors of War Exaggerated? Religious Orthodoxy and Moral Progressivism in America.”American Journal of Sociology102: 756-776.
20.
Dillon, Michele. 1996. “Cultural Differences in the Abortion Discourse of the Catholic Church: Evidence from Four Countries.”Sociology of Religion57: 25-39.
21.
DiMaggio, Paul, John Evans, and Bethany Bryson. 1996. “Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?”American Journal of Sociology102: 690-755.
22.
Emerson, Michael O.1996. “Through Tinted Glasses: Religion, Worldviews, and Abortion Attitudes.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion35: 41-55.
23.
Evans, John H.2002a. “Polarization in Abortion Attitudes in U.S. Religious Traditions, 1972-1998.”Sociological Forum17: 397-422.
24.
Evans, John H.2002b. “Religion and Human Cloning: An Exploratory Analysis of the First Available Opinion Data.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion41: 749-760.
25.
Evans, John H.2003. “Have Americans’ Attitudes Become More Polarized? An Update.”Social Science Quarterly (forthcoming).
26.
Evans, John H., Bethany Bryson, and Paul DiMaggio. 2001. “Opinion Polarization: Important Contributions, Necessary Limitations.”American Journal of Sociology106: 944-959.
27.
Franklin, Charles H., and Liane C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.”American Political Science Review83: 751-771.
28.
Fried, Amy. 1988. “Abortion Politics as Symbolic Politics: An Investigation Into Belief Systems.”Social Science Quarterly69: 137-154.
29.
Grindstaff, Laura. 1994. “Abortion and the Popular Press: Mapping Media Discourse from Roe to Webster.” In Ted G. Jelen and Marthe A. Chandler, eds., Abortion Politics in the United States and Canada: Studies in Public Opinion, pp.57-88. Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
Hall, E., and M. Ferree. 1986. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.”Public Opinion Quarterly50: 193-207.
31.
Hetherington, Marc J.2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.”American Political Science Review95: 619-631.
32.
Himmelstein, Jerome. 1986. “The Social Basis of Anti-Feminism.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion25: 1-25.
33.
Hoffman, John P., and Alan S. Miller. 1997. “Social and Political Attitudes Among Religious Groups: Convergence and Divergence Over Time.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion36: 52-70.
34.
Howell, Susan E., and Robert T. Sims, “Abortion Attitudes and the Louisiana Governor’s Election.” In Malcolm L. Goggin, ed., Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, pp. 154-162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Hunter, James Davison. 1991, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Hunter, James Davison. 1994. Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America’s Culture War. New York: Free Press.
37.
Jelen, Ted G.1984. “Respect for Life, Sexual Morality, and Opposition to Abortion.”Review of Religious Research25: 220-231.
38.
Jelen, Ted G.1988. “Changes in the Attitudinal Correlates of Opposition to Abortion.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion27: 211-228.
39.
Jelen, Ted G.1992a. “The Clergy and Abortion.”Review of Religious Research34: 132-151.
40.
Jelen, Ted G.1992b. “Political Christianity: A Contextual Analysis.”American Journal of Political Science36: 692-714.
41.
Jelen, Ted G.1997. “Culture Wars and the Party System: Religion and Realignment, 1972-1993.” In Rhys H. Williams, ed., Culture Wars in American Politics: Critical Reviews of a Popular Thesis, pp. 145-158. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
42.
Jelen, Ted G.1999. “On the Hegemony of Liberal Individualism: A Reply to Williams.”Sociology of Religion60: 35-40.
43.
Jelen, Ted G.2000. To Serve God and Mammon: Church-State Relations in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
Jelen, Ted G., and Marthe A. Chandler. 2000. “Culture Wars in the Trenches: Short-Term Forces in Presidential Elections, 1968-1996.”American Review of Politics21: 69-87.
45.
Jelen, Ted G., David F. Damore, and Thomas Lamatsch. 2002. “Gender, Employment Status, and Abortion: A Longitudinal Analysis,”Sex Roles47: 321-330.
46.
Jelen, Ted G., and Clyde Wilcox. 1997. “Attitudes Toward Abortion in Poland and the United States.”Social Science Quarterly78: 907-921.
47.
Koch, Jeffrey W.2001. “When Parties and Candidates Collide: Citizen Perceptions of House Candidates’ Positions on Abortion”Public Opinion Quarterly65: 1-21.
48.
Krauthammer, Charles. 2002. “Crossing Lines: A Secular Argument Against Research Cloning.”The New Republic, April 29, pp. 20-23.
49.
Layman, Geoffrey C.2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Political Parties. New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Thomas M. Carsey. 1998. “Why Do Party Activists Convert? An Analysis of Individual-Level Change on the Abortion Issue.”Political Research Quarterly31: 723-740.
51.
Leege, David C.1996. “The Catholic Vote in ‘96: Can It Be Found in Church?”Commonweal123 (September 27): 33-52.
52.
Lindaman, Kara, and Donald R. Haider-Markel. 2002. “Issue Evolution, Political Parties, and the Culture Wars.”Political Research Quarterly55: 91-110.
53.
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
Maxwell, Carol. 2002. Pro-Life Activists in America: Meaning, Motivation, and Direct Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
McDonald, Michael. 1998. “Redistricting, Dealignment, and the Political Homogenization of the House of Representatives” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September.
56.
McDonagh, Eileen. 1996. Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
McKibben, Bill. 2002. “Unlikely Allies Against Cloning”New York Times, March 27, p. A23-A23.
58.
Mouw, Ted, and Michael E. Sobel. 2001. “Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion.”American Journal of Sociology106: 913-943.
59.
O’Connor, Karen. 1996. No Neutral Ground? Abortion Politics in an Age of Absolutes. Boulder, CO: Westview.
60.
O’Connor, Robert E., and Michael B. Berkman. 1995. “Religious Determinants of State Abortion Policy.”Social Science Quarterly76: 447-459.
61.
Petersen, Larry R.2001. “Religion, Plausibility Structures, and Education’s Effects on Attitudes Toward Abortion.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 40: 187-204.
62.
Petrocik, John R.1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections: With A 1980 Case Study.”American Journal of Political Science40: 825-850.
63.
Saad, Lydia. 2002. “ ‘Cloning’ Humans is a Turn Off to Most Americans.”Gallup News Service(http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr020516.asp)
64.
Schecter, David. 2001. “What Drives the Voting on Abortion Policy? Investigating Partisanship and Religion in the State Legislative Arena.”Women & Politics3: 61-84.
65.
Schnell, Frauke. 1993. “The Foundations of Abortion Attitudes: The Role of Values and Value Conflict.” In Malcolm L. Goggin, ed., Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, pp. 23-42. Newbury Park, CA.
66.
Schroedel, Jean Reith. 2000. Is the Fetus a Person? A Comparison of Policies Across the Fifty States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67.
Schuman, H., S. Presser, and J. Ludwig. 1981. “Contextual Effects on Survey Responses to Questions About Abortion.”Public Opinion Quarterly41: 216-223.
68.
Segers, Mary C., and Timothy A. Byrnes, eds. 1994. Abortion Politics in American States. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
69.
Sharpe, Elaine B.1999. The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
70.
Smith, Kevin B.1994. “Abortion Attitudes and Vote Choice in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Elections.”American Politics Quarterly22: 354-369.
71.
Sullins, D. Paul. 1999. “Catholic/Protestant Trends on Abortion: Convergence and Polarity.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion38: 354-369.
72.
Tatalovich, Raymond, and David Schier. 1993. “The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973-1988.” In Malcolm L. Goggin, ed., Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, pp.109-122. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
73.
Tribe, Laurence. 1989. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: Norton.
74.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
Welch, Michael R., David C. Leege, and James C. Cavendish. 1995. “Attitudes Toward Abortion Among U.S. Catholics: Another Case of Symbolic Politics?”Social Science Quarterly76: 142-157.
76.
Wetstein, Matthew E.1993. “A LISREL Model of Public Opinion on Abortion.” In Malcolm L. Goggin, ed., Understanding the New Politics of Abortion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77.
Wetstein, Matthew E.1996. Abortion Rates in the United States: The Influence of Opinion and PolicyAlbany. New York: SUNY Press.
78.
Wilcox, Clyde. 1990. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes: Some Additional Evidence.”Public Opinion Quarterly54: 248-255.
79.
Wilcox, Clyde. 1995. “The Sources and Consequences of Public Attitudes Toward Abortion.” In Ted G. Jelen, ed., Perspectives on the Politics of Abortion. Westport, CT: Praeger: 55-86.
80.
Wilcox, Clyde. 2001. “Evangelicals and Abortion.” Paper presented at the Evangelical Civic Engagement Colloquium, Cape Elizabeth, Maine, June.
81.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Barbara Norrander. 2002. “Of Mood and Morals: The Dynamics of Opinion on Abortion and Gay Rights.” In Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox, eds, Understanding Public Opinion, 2nd ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
82.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Julia Riches. 2002. “Pills in the Public’s Mind: RU 486 and the Framing of the Abortion IssueWomen & Politics (forthcoming).
83.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Malcolm L. Goggin. 1993. “The Courts, Interest Groups, and Public Opinion About Abortion. Political Behavior15: 381-405.