Whether and how governors influence public policies in the U.S. is open to question. This research tests a model of gubernatorial influence on public policymaking in which gubernatorial power is conceived of the governor’s power over the budgetary process relative to that of the state legislature. We argue that governors with greater control over the budget process will use those powers to deliver a higher proportion of policies that confer benefits to statewide versus more localized constituencies. As governors’ electoral security increases, their willingness to support legislatively desired localized spending increases. Empirical results derived from pooled cross-sectional models largely support the models tested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abney, Glenn, and Thomas P. Lauth. 1995. “The Line Item Veto in the States: An Instrument for Fiscal Restraint or an Instrument for Partisanship?”Public Administration Review45: 372-379.
2.
Abney, Glenn, and Thomas P. Lauth. 1997. “The Item Veto and Fiscal Responsibility.”Journal of Politics59: 882-892.
3.
Achen, Christopher. 2000. “Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables.” Working paper available at http://web.polmeth.ufl.edu/working00.alpha.html.
4.
Alt, James E., and Robert C. Lowry. 1994. “Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States.”American Political Science Review88: 811-828.
5.
Barrilleaux, Charles. 1997. “A Test of the Independent Influences of Electoral Competition and Party Strength in a Model of State Policy-Making.”American Journal of Political Science41: 1462-1466.
6.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. “What To Do (And Not To Do) With Time-Series Cross-Section Data.”American Political Science Review89: 634-647.
8.
Bernick, E. Lee, and Charles W. Wiggins. 1981. “Executive-Legislative Power Relationships.”American Politics Quarterly9: 467-477.
9.
Berry, Frances S., and William D. Berry. 1992. “Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity.”American Journal of Political Science36: 715-742.
10.
Berry, William D., E. J. Ringquist, R. C. Fording, and R. L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.”American Journal of Political Science41: 337-348.
11.
Berry, William D., and Richard Fording. 1997. “Measuring State Tax Capacity and Effort.”Social Science Quarterly78: 158-166.
12.
Beyle, Thad. 1996. “Governors: The Middleman and Women in Our Political System.” In Virginia Gray and Herbert Jacob, eds., Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 6th ed., pp. 207-252. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
13.
Brace, Paul. 1993. State Government and Economic Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections.”Journal of Politics62: 671-700.
15.
Carmines, Edward G.1974. “The Mediating Influence of State Legislatures on the Linkage Between Interparty: Competition and Welfare Policies.”American Political Science Review68(3) September: 1118-1124.
16.
Clarke, Wes. 1998. “Divided Government and Budget Conflict in the U.S. States.”Legislative Studies Quarterly23 (1): 5-22.
17.
Clynch, Edward J., and Thomas P. Lauth. 1991. Governors Legislatures, and Budgets: Diversity Across the American States. New York: Greenwood Press.
18.
Council of State Governments. Various Years. The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: CSG.
19.
Crain, W. Mark. 1999. “Districts, Diversity, and Fiscal Biases: Evidence From The American States.”Journal Of Law and Economics42 (2): 675-698
20.
Crain, W. Mark, and James C. Miller III. 1990. “Budget Process and Spending Growth.”William and Mary Law Review31: 1021-1046.
21.
Dometrius, Nelson C.1987. “Changing Gubernatorial Power: The Measure vs. Reality.”Western Political Quarterly40: 320-328.
22.
Dye, Thomas. 1984. “Party and Policy in the States.”Journal of Politics46: 1097-1116.
23.
Erikson, R., G. Wright, and J. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Fiorina, Morris. 1994. “Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism.”American Political Science Review88: 304-316.
25.
Gosling, James J.1994. “Budget Procedures and Executive Review in State Legislatures.” In Joseph Silbey, ed., The Encyclopedia of American Legislatures. New York: Scribners.
26.
Gosling, James J.1997. Budgetary Politics, 2nd ed.New York: Garland.
27.
Green, William H.1993. Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: McMillan.
28.
Gross, Donald A.1989. “Governors and Policymaking: Theoretical Concerns and Analytic Approaches.”Policy Studies Journal17: 764-787.
29.
Hedge, David M.1998. Governance and the Changing American States. Boulder, CO: Westview.
30.
Holbrook, Thomas, and Emily Van Dunk. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.”American Political Science Review87: 955-962.
31.
Jaccard, James, Robert Turrisi, and Choi K. Wan. 1990. “Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression.”Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, pp. 7-72. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Knott, Jack H., and Gary J. Miller. 1987. Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional Choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33.
Lowi, Theodore. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.
34.
Maestas, Cherie. 2000. “Courting the Future: The Effect of Ambition on the Behavior of State Legislatures.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Meetings, Washington, D.C., August 30-September 4.
35.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Morehouse, Sarah. 1998. The Governor as Party Leader. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
37.
Mueller, Keith. 1985. “Explaining Variation and Change in Gubernatorial Powers, 1960-1982.”Western Political Quarterly38: 424-431.
38.
National Association of State Budget Officers. Various Years. Budget Processes in the States. Washington, DC: NASBO.
39.
Peterson, Mark A.1990. Legislating Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Peterson, Paul E.1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
41.
Plotnick, Robert D., and Richard F. Winters. 1985. “A Politicoeconomic Theory of Income Redistribution.”American Political Science Review79: 458-473.
42.
Poterba, James M.1996. “Budget Institutions and Fiscal Policy in the US States.”American Economic Review86: 395-400.
43.
Ranney, Austin. 1971. “Parties in State Politics.” In Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines, eds., Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 2nd ed., pp.82-121. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
44.
Rosenthal, Alan. 1998. The Decline of Representative Democracy: Process, Participation and Power in State Legislatures. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
45.
Sabato, Larry. 1978. Goodbye to Good-Tme Charlie: The American Governor Transformed, 1950-1975. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
46.
Schlesinger, Joseph A.1971. “The Politics of the Executive.” In H. Jacob and K. Vines, eds., Politics in the American States, 2nd ed., pp. 210-237. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
47.
Schlesinger, Joseph A.1985. “The New American Political Party.”American Political Science Review79: 1152-1169.
48.
Schlesinger, Joseph A.1994. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
49.
Sharkansky, Ira. 1968. “Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support, and Budget Success in State Legislatures.”American Political Science Review62: 1220-1231.
50.
Sigelman, Lee, and Nelson Dometrius. 1988. “Governors as Chief Administrators.”American Politics Quarterly16: 157-170.
51.
Smith, Steven. 1995. The American Congress. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
52.
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly.”Journal of Politics54: 1026-1054.
53.
Stanfield, Rochelle L.1996. “Just Do It.”National Journal28 (13): 681-748.
54.
Thurber, James A.1997. “Centralization, Devolution, and Turf Protection in The Congressional Budget Process.” In Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 6th, eds, pp. 325-346. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
55.
Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Public Affairs Press.
56.
Weingast, Barry, Kenneth A. Shepsle, Christopher Johnsen. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.”Journal of Political Economy89 (4): 642-664.
57.
Winters, Richard F.1976. “Partisan Control and Policy Change.”American Journal of Political Science20: 597-636.
58.
Wong, Kenneth K.1989. “Policy-Making in the American States: Typology, Process, and Institutions.”Policy Studies Review8: 527-548.
