While a long tradition of research documents the demographic and psychological determinants of political participation, there is also evidence to suggest that changes in communication technology may play an important role in influencing electoral behavior. We suggest traditional models of voter turnout may be under-specified with respect to changes in the media, especially use of new information technologies. The Internet may enhance voter information about candidates and elections, and in turn stimulate increased participation. Using NES survey data and multivariate analysis we find respondents with access to the Internet and online election news were significantly more likely to report voting in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. This was true even after controlling for socioeconomic status, partisanship, attitudes, traditional media use, and state environmental factors. Simulations suggest access to Internet and online election news significantly increased the probability of voting by an average of 12 percent and 7.5 percent, respectively, in the 2000 election. The mobilizing potential of the Internet in 2000 was also associated with increased participation beyond voting. The findings help us understand how technology can impact voting and American political participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, P. R.1983. Political Attitudes in America. San Francisco: Freeman.
2.
Benner, J.2002, Feb. 7. “Bush Plan ‘Digital Distortion’”Wired News. Available [Online]: http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,50279,00.html.
3.
Bimber, B.1999. “The Internet and Citizen Communication with Government: Does the Medium Matter?”Political Communication16 (4): 409-428.
4.
Bimber, B.2001. “Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level.”Political Research Quarterly54(1): 53-67.
5.
Bower, S., and T. Donovan. 2002. “Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government.”British Journal of Political Science32: 371-390.
6.
Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Cappella, J. N., and H. K. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Chaffee, S. and Kanihan, S. F.1997. “Learning About Politics from the Media.”Political Communication14 (4): 421-430.
9.
Cigler, A., J. Marion, and S. B. Green. 2000. “Connecting with the Internet in Political Campaigns: Experiments on Race and User Satisfaction.” Presented at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August 31-September 3, 2000.
10.
Conway, M.1991. Political Participation in the United States, 2d ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
11.
Crotty, W. J., and G. C. Jacobson. 1980. American Parties in Decline. Boston: Little, Brown.
12.
Davis, R., ed. 1994. Politics and the Media. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
DeFleur, M. L., and S. Ball-Rokeach. 1989. Theories of Mass Communication5th ed.New York: Longman.
14.
Entman, R .M.1989. Democracy Without Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Fallows, J.1996. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Patheon.
16.
Gibson, R.2002. “Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary.”Political Science Quarterly116 (4): 561-583.
17.
Graber, D. A.1989. Mass Media and American Politics, 3rd ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
18.
Hall, J.2000. “A Nation, not a Niche.”Columbia Journalism Review39 (2): 12-12.
19.
Hero, Rodney. 1998. Faces of Inequality: Social Diversity in American Politics. New York: Oxford Press.
20.
Hero, R., and C. Tolbert. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.”American Journal of Political Science40: 851-871.
21.
Hill, K., and J. Leighley. 1999. “Racial Diversity, Voter Turnout, and Mobilizing Institutions in the United States.”American Politics Quarterly27: 275-295.
22.
Huckfeldt, R.1979. “Political Participation and the Neighborhood Social Context.“American Journal of Political Science23: 579-592.
23.
Huckfeldt R., and J. Sprague. 1988. “Choice, Social Structure, and Political Information: The Information Coercion of Minorities.“American Journal of Political Science32: 467-482.
24.
Iyengar, S., D. R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Agenda-Setting and Priming in a Television Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Kerbel, M. R.1995. Remote and Controlled: Media Politics in a Cynical Age. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
Kerbel, M. R.1998. Edited for Television: CNN, ABC, and American Presidential Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
27.
King, G., M. Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analysis: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.”American Journal of Political Science44: 347-361.
28.
Lewis-Beck, M. S., and T. W. Rice. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
29.
Marlin, A. S.1999. “Politics on the Web, Why and Where?”Campaigns and Elections20 (3): 11-12.
30.
McChesney, R. W.1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy; Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
31.
McComb, M. E., and D. L.1972. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the Mass Media.”Public Opinion Quarterly36 (2): 176-187.
32.
McLeod, J., and D. McDonald. 1985. “Beyond Simple Exposure: Media Orientations and Their Impact on the Political Process.”Communication Research12: 3-34.
33.
Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury. Forthcoming 2003. Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
34.
Nie, Norman H., and Lutz Erbring. 2000. Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
35.
Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36.
O’Keefe, G. J., and K. Reid-Nash. 1987. “Socialization Functions.” In C. R. Berger and S. H. Chaffee, eds., Handbook of Communication Science, (pp. 419-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 2000. Campaign and Internet Survey. October 10-November 25, N = 1,435.
38.
Piven, F. F., and R. A. Cloward. 1983. Why Americans Don’t Vote. New York: Pantheon.
39.
Putnam, R.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
40.
Rosenstone, S. J., and M. Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
41.
Shah, D., N. Kwak, and R. Holbert. 2001. “‘Connecting’ and ‘Disconnecting’ with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital.”Political Communication18: 141-162.
42.
Smith, E.1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Smith, M.2001. “The Contingent Effects of Ballot Initiatives and Candidate Races on Turnout.”American Journal of Political Science45: 700-706.
44.
Solop, F. I. 2000. “Digital Democracy Comes of Age in Arizona: Participation and Politics in the First Binding Internet Election.” Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. August 31-September 3, 2000.
45.
Sunstein, C.2001. “Freedom of Expression in the United States: The Future,” In T. Hensley, ed., The Boundaries of Freedom of Expression and Order in American Democracy. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
46.
Tolbert, C. J., J. Grummel, and D. A. Smith. 2001. “The Effects of Ballot Initiatives on Voter Turnout in the United States.”American Politics Research29 (6): 625-648.
47.
U.S. Department of Commerce. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 2002. A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. Available [Online]: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/anationonline2.pdf/.
48.
Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.
50.
Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Wayne, L. (2000, May 21). “On Web, Voters Reinvent Grass-Roots Activism.”New York Times, p. 30-30, sec.1.
52.
Weaver, D. H.1996. “What Voters Learn from Media.”Annual of the AAPSSJuly: 34-47.
53.
Weaver, D. H., and D. Drew. 1993. “Voter Learning in the 1990 Off-Year Election: Did the Media Matter?”Journalism Quarterly70: 356-368.
54.
Weaver, D. H., D. A. Graber, M. E. McCombs, and C. H. Eyal. 1981. Media Agenda-Setting in a Presidential Election: Issues, Images and Interest. New York: Praeger.
55.
Weber, L. M., and J. Bergman. 2001. “Who Participates and How? A Comparison of Citizens ‘Online’ and the Mass Public.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, March 15-17, 2001, Las Vegas, NV.
56.
Wolfinger, R., and S. J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
