We compare the ability of female and male members of the House of Representatives to turn policy preferences into law—something we label “legislative effectiveness.” The existing literature on women in American legislatures is opaque, with some scholars suggesting women are less effective than their male colleagues and others arguing they are just as effective. Utilizing data from the 103rd-105th Congresses—specifically, data on bill and amendment sponsorship and Stein and Bickers’ data on the distribution of federal domestic spending—we argue women House members are not demonstrably less effective than their male counterparts. Legislative effectiveness is the product of seniority, preferences, and membership in important House institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2000. “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee.”Journal of Politics62: 1-33.
2.
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed.Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
3.
Alvarez, Lizette. 2000. “Feminine Mystique Grows in the Senate.”New York Times, December 7, A22-A22.
4.
Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, and Valeria Sinclair Chapman. 2000. “Navigating Rough Waters: Modeling Member Effectiveness in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Paper delivered to the American Political Science Association, Washington DC.
5.
Barrett, Edith. 1995. “The Policy Priorities of African-American Women in State Legislatures.”Legislative Studies Quarterly20: 223-247.
6.
Berkman, Michael B. and Robert E. O’Connor. 1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.”American Politics Quarterly21: 102-124.
7.
Bingham, Clara. 1997. Challenging the Culture of Congress. New York: Times Books.
8.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and J. Tobin Grant. 1999. “All in a Day’s Work: The Financial Rewards of Legislative Effectiveness.”Legislative Studies Quarterly24: 511-523.
9.
Boxer, Barbara. 1994. Strangers in the Senate. Bethesda, MD: National Press Books.
10.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.”Journal of Politics61: 658-679.
11.
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
Clark, Janet. 1998. “Women at the National Level: an Update on Roll Call Voting Behavior.” In Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox, eds., Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkley: University of California Press.
14.
Deering, Christopher J., and Steven S. Smith. 1997. Committees in Congress, 3rd ed.Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
15.
Dodson, Debra L.1998. “Representing Women’s Interests in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox, eds., Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Dodson, Debra L., and Susan Carroll. 1991. Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick: Center for American Women and Politics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
17.
Dolan, Kathleen, and Lynne E. Ford. 1995. “Women in the State Legislatures.”American Politics Quarterly23: 96-108
18.
Ellickson, Mark C., and Donald E. Whistler. 2000. “A Path Analysis of Legislative Success in Professional and Citizen Legislatures: A Gender Comparison.”Women in Politics21: 77-103.
19.
Foerstal, Karen, and Herbert Foerstal. 1996. Climbing the Hill: Gender Conflict in Congress. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
Gehlen, Freida. 1977. “Women Members of Congress: A Distinctive Role.” In Marianne Githens and Jewell Prestage, eds., A Portrait of Marginality: The Political Behavior of the American Woman. New York: McKay Co.
21.
Gertzog, Irwin. 1995. Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration, and Behavior, 2nd ed.Westport, CT: Praeger.
22.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women ’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand’s Women MPs.”Parliamentary Affairs55: 19-29.
24.
Grier, Kevin B., Michael C. Munger, and Brian E. Roberts. 1994. “The Determinants of Industry Political Activity, 1978-1986.”American Political Science Review88: 911-926.
25.
Groseclose, Tim, and Charles Stewart, III. 1998. “The Value of Committee Seats in the House, 1947-91.”American Journal of Political Science42: 453-474.
26.
Hager, Gregory L. and Jeffery C. Talbert. 2000. “Look for the Party Label: Party Influences on Voting in the U.S. House.”Legislative Studies Quarterly25: 75-99.
27.
Heckman, James. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.”Econometrica47: 153-161.
28.
Hibbing, John. 1991. Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
29.
Howell, William, Scott Adler, Charles Cameron, and Charles Riemann. 2000. “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94.”Legislative Studies Quarterly35: 285-312.
30.
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Marcia Lynn Whicker. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31.
Jeydel, Alana, and Andrew J. Taylor. 2001. “Are Women Effective Legislators? Evidence from the 103rd-105th Congresses. ” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American political Science Association, San Francisco.
32.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.”American Journal of Sociology82: 965-990.
33.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence of State Legislative Policymaking: the Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.”American Political Science Review88: 560-576.
34.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1995. “Alternative Views of crime: Legislative Policymaking in Gendered Terms.”The Journal of Politics57: 696-723.
35.
Kenney, Sally. 1996. “New Research on Gendered Political Institutions.”Political Research Quarterly49: 445-466.
36.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where’s the Party?”British Journal of Political Science23: 235-266.
37.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Leader, Shelah Gilbert. 1977. “The Policy Impact of Elected Women Officials.” In Joseph Cooper and Louis Maisel, eds., The Impact of the Electoral Process. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
39.
Levitt, Steven D., and James M. Snyder, Jr.1995. “Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays.”American Journal of Political Science39: 958-980.
40.
Margolies-Mezvinsky, Marjorie. 1994. A Woman’s Place: The Freshman Women Who Changed the Face of Congress. New York: Crown.
41.
Mayhew David R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Mayhew David R.1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Norton, Noelle H.1995. “Women, It’s Not Enough To Be Elected: Committee Position Makes A Difference.” In Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, eds., Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
45.
Norton, Noelle H.1999a. “Uncovering the Dimensionality of Gender Voting in Congress.”Legislative Studies Quarterly24: 65-86.
46.
Norton, Noelle H.1999b. “Committee Influence Over Controversial Policy: the Reproductive Policy Case.”Policy Studies Journal27: 203-216.
47.
Pearson, Kathryn. 2001. “Legislating in Women’s Interests? Congresswomen in the 106th Congress.” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
48.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators.”Legislative Studies Quarterly17: 509-537.
50.
Reingold, Beth. 1996. “Conflict and Cooperation: Legislative Strategies and Concepts of Power among Female and Male State Legislators.”Journal of Politics58: 464-485.
51.
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
52.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
Sigelman, Lee, and Langche Zeng. 2000. “Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckit Models.”Political Analysis8: 167-182.
54.
Snyder, James M., Jr., and Tim Groseclose. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll Call Voting.”American Journal of Political Science44: 193-211.
55.
Stein, Robert M., and Kenneth N. Bickers. 1995. Perpetuating the Pork Barrel: Policy Subsystems and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Swers, Michelle. 1998. “Are Congresswomen More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills Than their Male Colleagues?”Legislative Studies Quarterly23: 435-448.
57.
Swers, Michelle. 2000. “From the Year of the Woman to the Republican Ascendancy: Evaluating the Policy Impact of Women in Congress.” Dissertation Manuscript.
58.
Swers, Michelle. 2002a. “Transforming the Agenda? Analyzing Gender Differences in Women’s Issue Bill Sponsorship.” In Cindy Simon Rosenthal, ed., Women Transforming Congress, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
59.
Swers, Michelle. 2002b. The Difference Women Make: the Policy impact of Women in Congress. Chicago and Lodon: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Tamerius, Karin L.1995. “Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women.” In Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly, eds., Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
61.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
Thomas, Sue. 1997. “Why Gender Matters: The Perceptions of Women Officeholders.”Women and Politics17: 27-53.
63.
Thomas, Sue, and Susan Welch. 1991. “The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.”Western Political Quarterly44 (2): 454-455.
64.
Vega, Arturo, and Juanita M. Firestone. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.”Legislative Studies Quarterly20: 213-222.
65.
Welch Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?”Legislative Studies Quarterly10: 125-134.
66.
Witt, Linda, Karen M. Paget, and Glenna Matthews. 1994. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.
67.
Wolfensberger, Donald. 2001. “Professor Fenno’s ‘Power of the Purse’ Revisited.” Paper for Woodrow Wilson Center. http://wwics.si.edu/NEWS/wolfens/fenno.htm
