This article explores the linkages between television news and the decline of partisanship in Latin America, using survey data for eight countries. After discussing the erosion of traditional Latin American parties during the 1990s, I show that the literature has assumed different types of causal links between television and party dealignment (treatment vs. strategic effects, and cohort vs. short-term effects). Based on comparative research on industrial and new democracies, I present two contrasting hypotheses (television news inhibits partisanship; exposure to television creates political awareness) and test the impact of short-term treatment effects using a multinomial logit model. The results suggest that television news encourages party identification in the short run (through treatment effects), although the development of television may weaken Latin American parties in the long run (through strategic effects).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agresti, Alan. 1996. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley
2.
Barker, David C.1998. “The Talk Radio Community: Nontraditional Social Networks and Political Participation”.. Social Science Quarterly79 (2): 261-272.
3.
Barker, David C.1999. “Rushed Decisions: Political Talk Radio and Vote Choice, 19941996”.. Journal of Politics61 (2): 527-539.
4.
Barnhurst, Kevin G., and Catherine A. Steele. 1997. “Image-Bite News: The Visual Coverage of Elections on U.S. Television, 1968-1992”.. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics2 (1): 40-58.
5.
Belejack, Barbara. 1997.“Sound Bites and Soap Operas: How Mexican Television Reported the 1994 Presidential Elections.” In William A. Orme Jr., ed., A Culture of Collusion: An Inside Look at the Mexican Press. Miami: North-South Center Press.
6.
Blinder, Scott. 1997.“Television and the decline of political partisanship”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago: April 11.
7.
Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh. 1999.“The Third Age of Political Communication. Influences and Features”. Political Communication16: 209-230.
8.
Brosius, Hans-Bernd, and Hans Mathias Kepplinger. 1992.“Beyond Agenda-Setting: The Influence of Partisanship and Television Reporting on the Electorate's Voting Intentions”. Journalism Quarterly69: 893-901.
9.
Chaffee, Steven, and Stacey Frank. 1996.“How Americans Get Political Information: Print Versus Broadcast News”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546: 48-58.
10.
Cole, Richard, Miguel Casas, and Patricia Richardson. 1996.“Preface.” In Richard Cole, ed., Communication in Latin America. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
11.
Delli Carpini, Michael. 1996. “Voters, candidates and campaigns in the new information age: an overview and assessment”.. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics1 (4): 36-56.
12.
Epstein, Leon. 1986. Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
Grossman, Lawrence K.1995. The Electronic Republic. Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. New York: Viking.
14.
Jenkins, Richard W1999.“How Much is Too Much? Media Attention and Popular Support for an Insurgent Party”Political Communication16: 429-445.
15.
Kavanagh, Dennis. 1996.“New Campaign Communications: Consequences for British Political Parties”. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics1 (3): 60-76.
16.
Kenney, Charles. 1998.“Outsider and Anti-Party Politicians in Power. New Conceptual Strategies and Empirical Evidence from Peru”. Party Politics4: 57-75.
17.
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, and Jan A. De Ridder. 1998.“Issue News and Electoral Volatility A Comparative Analysis of Media Effects during the 1994 Election Campaigns in Germany and the Netherlands”. European Journal of Political Research33: 413-437.
18.
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Modelsfor Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
Mainwaring, Scott. 1998. “Party Systems in the Third Wave”.. Journal of Democracy9 (3): 78-81.
20.
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization. The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully1995.“Conclusion: Parties and Democracy in Latin America-Different Patterns, Common Challenges.” In Scott Mainwaring and Timothy Scully, eds., Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
22.
Martz, John D.1990.“Electoral Campaigning and Latin American Democratization: The Grancolombian Experience”. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs32: 17-44
23.
Mayorga, Fernando. 1991. Max Fernandez. La Politica del Silencio. La Paz: ILDISUMSS.
24.
Mayorga, Fernando. 1993. Discurso y Politica en Bolivia. La Paz: CERES-ILDIS.
25.
Menendez Alarcon, Antonio V1992. Power and Television in Latin America. The Dominican Case. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Mickiewicz, Ellen. 1997. Changing Channels. Television and the Struggle for Power in Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Miller, M. Mark, and Stephen Reese. 1982.“Media Dependency as Interaction: Effects of Exposure and Reliance on Political Activity and Efficacy”Communication Research9: 227-248.
28.
Moy, Patricia, Michael Pfau, and LeeAnn Kahlor. 1999.“Media Use and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions”. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43: 137-158.
29.
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, NDI1995.“Partidos Politicos en las Americas: Desafios y Estrategias.”Washington, DC: NDI.
30.
Oates, S., and L. Roselle. 2000.“Russian Elections and TV News. Comparison of Campaign News on State-Controlled and Commercial Television Channels”. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5 (2): 30-51.
31.
Ollier, Maria Matilde. 2001. Las Coaliciones Politicas en la Argentina: El Caso de La Alianza. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Economica.
32.
Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos. 2000.“Election Campaigning in the Television Age: The Case of Contemporary Greece”. Political Communication17: 47-60.
33.
Patterson, Thomas E.1993. Out of Order. New York:Knopf.
34.
Robert D.1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Patterson, Thomas E.1995.“Tuning in, Tuning out: the Strange Ddisappearance of Social Capital in America”. PS Political Science and Politics28: 664-683.
36.
Patterson, Thomas E.2000. Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
37.
Rahn, Wendy M., and Katherine J. Cramer. 1996.“Activation and Application of Political Party Stereotypes: The Role of Television”. Political Communication13: 195-212.
38.
Romer, Graciela. 1995.“Actitudes hacia los Partidos Politicos en America Latina.”Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.
39.
Saravia, Joaquin, and Godofredo Sandoval. 1991.“Jach'a Uru: -La Esperanza de un Pueblo?” La Paz: ILDIS-CEP
40.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1989.“Video-Power”. Government and Opposition24: 39-53
41.
Semetko, Holi. 1996.“The media.” In Lawrence LeDuc, Richard Niemi and Pippa Norris, eds., Comparing Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
Seligson, Mitchell A.2002. “Trouble in Paradise: The Impact of the Erosion of System Support in Costa Rica, 1978-1999”.. Latin American Research Review37 (1): 160-185.
43.
Smith, Peter. 1995.“The Changing Agenda for Social Science Research on Latin America.” In Peter Smith, ed., Latin America in Comparative Perspective. New Approaches to Methods and Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
Soong, Roland, Paul Donato, and Pablo Verdin. 1996. Latin American Media: A Pan-Regional Perspective. New York: Audits and Surveys Worldwide.
45.
Trejo Delarbre, Raul. 1997.“Medios y politica en Mexico. Un panorama frente a las elecciones federales de 1997”. Paper presented at the XX International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. Guadalajara, Mexico, April 1719.
46.
Unesco. 1995. Statistical Yearbook/Annuaire Statistique. Paris: Unesco.
47.
Van Praag, Philip, and Cees Van der Eijk. 1998.“News Content and Effects in a Historic Campaign”. Political Communication15: 165-183.
48.
Waisbord, Silvio. 1995.“When Watchdogs Bark: Press and Political Accountability in South American Democracies”. Paper presented at the annual APSA meeting, Chicago, ILAugust 31-September 3.
49.
Waisbord, Silvio. 2000. Watchdog Journalism in South America. New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Ward, Ian. 1993.“Media Intrusion and the Changing Nature of the Established Parties in Australia antd Canada”. Canadian Journal of Political Science26: 477-506.
51.
Weaver, David H.1996.“What Voters Learn from Media”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546: 34-47.
52.
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “The Politics of Corruption in Latin America”.. Journal of Democracy9 (2): 108-121.
53.
Zuleta Puceiro, Enrique. 1993.“The Argentine Case: Television in the 1989 election.” In Thomas Skidmore, ed., Television, Politics, and the Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
