This article assesses whether the same attitudinal dimension that dominates judicial decision-making in the United States-liberalism/conservatism-is also prominent in the Canadian context. Specifically, the study examines the voting behavior of Canadian Supreme Court Justices in non-unanimous post-Charter cases decided during the first five terms of the Lamer Court (1991-95). After employing factor analysis, which disclosed three principal dimensions underlying the voting behavior of the justices, we closely examined the cases scoring most positively and most negatively on each of the factors. The principal dimensions underlying the Charter rulings suggest three prominent attitudinal conflicts dominate this Court period: communitarianism versus libertarianism, fair trial and criminal due process disputes, and judicial activism versus judicial self-restraint. These dimensions corroborate the findings of studies that have tracked the development of the Canadian Court in postCharter years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzenstat, Janet, and Peter Smith. 1985. “Liberal-Republicanism: The Revisionist Picture of Canada's Founding.” In Janet Ajzenstat and Peter Smith, eds., Canada's Origins: Liberal, Tory, or Republican. Carleton: Carleton University Press.
2.
Arnold, Stephen J., and DouglasJ. Tigert. 1974. “Canadians and Americans: A Comparative Analysis”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology15: 68-83.
3.
Bell, David V J., and Lorne Tepperman. 1991. The Roots of Disunity: A Study of Canadian Political Culture, rev. ed.Toronto: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bender, Paul A.1983. “Canadian Charter and U.S. Bill of Rights”. McGill Law Journal28: 811-866.
5.
Blackshield, A. R.1972. “Quantitative Analysis: The High Court of Australia, 1964-1969”. Lawasia3 (April): 1-66.
6.
Crawford, Craig, and James Curtis. 1979. “English Canadian-American Differences in Value Orientations: Survey Comparison Bearing on Lipset's Thesis.” Studies in Comparative International Development 14: 23-44.
7.
Danelski, David J.1969. “The Supreme Court of Japan: An Exploratory Study” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski, eds., Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 121-156. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Dator, James A.1969. “ Measuring Attitudes Across Cultures: A Factor Analysis of the Replies of Japanese Judges to Eysenck's Inventory of Conservative-Progressive Ideology.” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski, eds., Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 71-102. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
DiFrederico, Giuseppe, and Carlo Guarnieri. 1988. “The Courts in Italy” In J. Waltman and K. Holland, eds., The Political Role of Law Courts in Modern Democracies, pp. 153-180.
10.
Ducat, Craig R., and Robert Dudley1987. “Dimensions Underlying Economic Policymaking in the Early and Later Burger Courts”. Journal of Politics49: 521-539.
11.
Dudley, Robert, and Craig R. Ducat. 1986. “The Burger Court and Economic Liberalism”. Western Political Quarterly38: 236-249.
12.
Epp, Charles. 1996. “Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. American Political Science Review90: 765-779.
13.
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
14.
Fisher, William W, Morton J. Horwitz, and Thomas A Reed, eds. 1993. American Legal Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Flango, Victor E., and Glendon Schubert. 1969. “Two Surveys of Simulated Judicial Decision-Making: Hawaii and the Philippines.” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski, eds., Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 197-220. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Flango, Victor E., and Craig R. Ducat. 1977. “Toward an Integration of Public Law and Judicial Behavior”. Journal of Politics39: 41-72.
17.
Fouts, Donald E.1969. “Policy Making in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1950- 1960.” In Glendon Schubert and David J. Danelski, eds., Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 257-292. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Frank, Jerome. 1930. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Coward-McCann.
19.
Galligan, Brian, and David R. Slater. 1995. “Judicial Intrusion into the Australian Cabinet.” In Neal Tate and Torbjorn Vallinder, eds., The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, pp. 81-100. New York: New York University Press.
20.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. “Moral Orientation and Moral Development.” In Eva E Kittay, and Diana T. Myers, eds., Women and Moral Theory, pp. 19-33. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
22.
Glendon, Mary Ann.1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: The Free Press.
23.
Greene, Ian, Carl Baar, Peter McCormick, George Szablowski, and Martin Thomas. 1998. Final Appeal: Decision Making in Canadian Courts of Appeal. Toronto: Lorimer.
24.
Heard, Andrew1991. “The Charter in the Supreme Court of Canada: The Importance of which Judges Hear an Appeal”. Canadian Journal of Political Science24: 289-307.
25.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr.1881. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown.
26.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr.1897. “The Path of the Law”Harvard Law Review10: 457-478.
27.
Horowitz, Gad. 1966. “Conservatism, Liberalism, and Socialism in Canada: An Interpretation”. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science32: 143-171.
28.
Kawashima, Takeyosji. 1969. “Individualism in Decision-Making in the Supreme Court of Canada.” In Glendon Schubert and David J. Danelski, eds., Coiparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 103-120. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Kim, Jae-On, and Charles W Mueller. 1978a. Introduction to Factor Analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-013. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
Kim, Jae-On, and Charles W Mueller. 1978b. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-014. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
31.
Knopff, Rainer, and E L. Morton. 1992. Charter Politics. Scarborough: Nelson Canada.
32.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
33.
Lyons, Nona Plessner. 1988. “Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality” In Carol Gilligan and Hanis Ward, eds., Mapping the Moral Domain, pp. 221-245. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
MacKay, A. Wayne. 1983. “Judicial Process in the Supreme Court of Canada: The Patriation Reference and Its Implications for the Charter of Rights”. Osgoode Hall Law Journal21: 55-81.
35.
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
MacNeil, Robert. 1991. “Looking for My Country”. American Review of Canadian Studies21: 409-421.
37.
Manfredi, Christopher P1993. Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
38.
McIver, John. 1976. “ Scaling Judicial Decisions: The Panel Decision Making Process of the U.S. Courts of Appeals”. American Journal of Political Science20: 749-761.
39.
McRae, Kenneth. 1964. “The Structure of Canadian History.” In Louis Hartz, ed., The Founding of New Societies. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
40.
Mishler, William. 1991. “Review of Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada, by Seymour Martin Lipset”. Journal of Politics53: 272-274.
41.
Monahan, Patrick. 1987. Politics and the Constitution: The Charter, Federalism and the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: Carswell.
42.
Morton, FE L.1987. “The Political Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”. Canadian Journal of Political Science20: 31-55.
43.
Morton, FE L.. 1992. “The Charter Revolution and the Court Party”Osgoode Hall Law Journal30: 627-652.
44.
Morton, E L., Peter H. Russell, and MichaelJ. Withey1991. “Judging the Judges: The Supreme Court's First One Hundred Charter Decisions.” In Paul W Fox and Graham White, eds., 7th ed.Politics: Canada, Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
45.
Morton, F L., Peter H. Russell, and Troy Riddell. 1994. “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Descriptive Analysis of the First Decade”. National Journal of Constitutional Law5: 1-58.
46.
Neal, Patrick, and David Paris. 1990. “Liberalism and the Communitarian Critique: A Guide for the Perplexed”. Canadian Journal of Political Science23: 419-439.
47.
Peck, Sidney R.1967a. “A Behavioural Approach to the Judicial Process: Scalogram Analysis”. Osgoode Hall Law Journal5: 1-28.
48.
Peck, Sidney R.1967b. “ The Supreme Court of Canada, 1958-1966: A Search for Policy through Scalogram Analysis”. Canadian Bar Review45: 666-725.
49.
Peck, Sidney R.1969. “A Scalogram Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada, 1958- 1967.” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski, eds., Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 193-334. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
Power, John. 1995. “The Executive, the Judiciary, and Immigration Appeals in Australia.” In Neal Tate and Torbjorn Vallinder, eds., The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, pp. 101-114. New York: New York University Press.
51.
Presthus, R.1975. Elites in the Policy Process. London: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Pritchett, C. Herman. 1941. “Divisions of Opinion Among Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court”. American Political Science Review35: 890-890.
53.
Russell, Peter H.1982. “The Effect of a Charter of Rights on the Policy Making Role of Canadian Courts”. Canadian Public Administration25: 1-33.
54.
Russell, Peter H.1992. “The Supreme Court in the 1980s: A Commentary on the S.C.R. Statistics”. Osgoode Hall LawJournal30 (4): 771-795.
55.
Russell, Peter H.1995. “Canadian Constraints on Judicialization from Without.” In Neal Tate and Torbjorn Vallinder, eds., The Global Expansion ofJudicial Power, pp. 137-150. New York: New York University Press.
56.
Samonte, Abelrado G.1969. “The Philippine Supreme Court: A Study of Judicial Background Characteristics, Attitudes, and Decision-Making.” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski, eds. Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 157-195. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Schubert, Glendon A.1965. The Judicial Mind: Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
58.
Schubert, Glendon A.1969a. “The Dimensions of Decisional Response: Opinion and Voting Behavior of the Australian High Court.” In Joel B. Grossman and Joseph Tannenhaus, eds., Frontiers ofJudicial Research, pp. 163-195. New York: Wiley
59.
Schubert, Glendon A.1969b. “Two Causal Models of Decision-Making by the High Court of Australia.” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski, eds., Comparative Judicial Behavior, pp. 335-366. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Schubert, Glendon A.1974. The Judicial Mind Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
Schubert, Glendon A.1977. “Political Culture and Judicial Ideology: Some Cross-Cultural and Subcultural Comparisons”. Comparative Political Studies9 (January): 363-408.
62.
Schubert, Glendon A.1980. “Subcultural Effects on Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis”. Journal of Politics42: 951-992.
63.
Segal, Jeffrey, and Harold Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Shklar, Judith. 1964. Legalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
Slattery, Brian. 1987. “A Theory of the Charter”. Osgoode Hall Law Journal25: 701-747.
66.
Sniderman, Paul M., Joseph F Fletcher, Peter H. Russell, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1996. The Clash of Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67.
Tate, C. Neal. 1983. “The Methodology of Judicial Behavior Research: A Review and Critique”. Political Behavior5 (1): 51-82.
68.
Schubert, Glendon A.1995. “The Philippines and Southeast Asia.” In Neal Tate and Torbjorn Vallinder, eds., The Global Expansion ofjudicial Power, pp. 463-484. New York: New York University Press.
69.
Tate, C. Neal and Panu Sittiwong. 1989. “Decision Making in the Canadian Supreme Court: Extending the Personal Attributes Model Across Nations”. Journal of Politics51: 900-916.
70.
Tiryakian, Edward A.1991. “Review of Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada, by Seymour Martin Lipset”. American Journal of Sociology96: 1040-1042.
71.
Wasserstrom, Richard A.1961. The Judicial Decision. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
West, Robin. 1991. “Jurisprudence and Gender.” In Katharine T. Bartlett and Rosanne Kennedy, eds., Feminist Legal Theory, pp. 201-234. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
73.
Wetstein, Matthew E., and C. L. Ostberg. 1999. “Search and Seizure Cases in the Supreme Court of Canada: Extending an American Model of Judicial Decision Making Across Countries”. Social Science Quarterly80 (4): 757-774.
