A great deal of scholarly research has demonstrated that elites have considerable influence over the preference formation process of individuals. What scholars understand less is just how far the influence of elites extends. We test the pofential limits of elite influence by examining the public opinion dynamics that surrounded referendurns raising local taxes to finance the construction of new professional sports stadiums and arenas in the United States from 1984 to August 2000. Our research concludes that the shape of elite opinion does indeed matter, with a united elite positively affecting the likelihood that referendums will be approved. An independent effect for the degree of elite unity exists even when controlling for campaign expenditures, the public's share of the cost of building sports facilities, and pre-existing public support for the proposals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baade, Robert A.1996. “Professional Sports as Catalysts for Metropolitan Development”. Journal of Urban Affairs18: 1-17.
2.
Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan. 1998. Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Brady, Henry E., and Paul M. Sniderman. 1985. “The Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning”. Amercan Political Science Review79: 1061-1078.
4.
Brown, Clyde, and David M. Paul. 1999. “Local Organized Interests and the 1996 Cincinnati Sports Stadia Referendum”. Journal of Sport and Social Issues32: 218-237.
5.
Carmines, Edward G., and James H. Kuklinski. 1990. “Incentives, Opportunities, and the Logic of Public Opinion in American Political Representation”. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski, eds., Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting”. American Political Science Review74: 78-91.
7.
Cobb, Michael D., and James H. Kuklinski. 1997. “Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion”. American Journal of Political Science41: 88-121.
8.
Converse, Philip E.1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics”. In D. E. Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.
9.
Converse, Philip E.1970. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue”. In Edward R. Tufte, ed., The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, pp. 168-189. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
10.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics & Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
12.
Gerber, Elisabeth R.1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Karp, Jeffrey A.1998. “The Influence of Elite Endorsements in Initiative Campaigns”. In Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Caroline J. Tolbert, eds., Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
14.
Key, Jr., VO.1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
15.
Key, Jr., VO.1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Lippmann, Walter. 1997 [1922]. Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.
17.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts vs. Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections”. American Political Science Review88: 63-76.
18.
Magleby, David B.1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Mondak, Jeffrey. 1993. “Source Cues and Policy Approval: The Cognitive Dynamics of Public Support for the Reagan Agenda”. American Journal of Political Science37: 186-212.
20.
Mueller, Dennis C.1989. Public Choice II. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Press.
21.
Noll, Roger G., and Andrew Zimbalist. 1997. “The Economic Impact of Sports Teams and Facilities”. In Roger G. Noll and Andrew Zimbalist, eds, Sports, Jobs, and Taxes.Washington, DC: Brookings.
22.
Rosentraub, Mark. 1997. Major League Losers. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Sandomir, Richard. 1997. “The Name of the Game is New Stadiums”. New York Times, June 4, p. C23-C23.
24.
Simon, Herbert A.1945. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
25.
Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 1999. “The Dynamics of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing”. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
26.
Swindell, David, and Mark S. Rosentraub. 1998. “Who Benefits from the Presence of Professional Sports Teams? The Implications for Public Funding of Stadiums and Arenas”. Public Administration Review58: 11-20.
27.
Zaller, John R.1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Zisk, Betty1987. Money, Media and the Grassroots. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
