Four traditional models linking public opinion with government policies are found to form one combined, historical chain with opinion and policies intertwined over time. The traditional simple majority rule model takes a short-term approach to representation. A reverse linkage, with policies shaping opinion, extends the causal model backwards in time, as does an incrementalism and institutional lag model. The importance of this historical chain model is demonstrated in explaining crossstate differences in death penalty sentencing rates in the 1990s. Current public opinion does influence death penalty sentencing rates, but so does political culture. Past public opinion has an indirect influence on current punishment rates through the influence of past opinion on past policies. The presence of a prior capital punishment law provides a legitimization effect, resulting in greater support for the death penalty among a state's population. Without an extended causal chain approach, the interrelationships between public opinion and government policies cannot be fully appreciated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asher, Herbert B.1976. Causal Modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Baum, Lawrence. 1998. American Courts, 4th edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
Berger, Ronald J., W Lawrence Neuman, and Patricia Searles. 1991. “The Social and Political Context of Rape Law Reform: An Aggregate Analysis. Social Science Quarterly72: 221-238.
4.
Berkman, Michael B., and Robert E. O'Connor. 1993. “Do Women Legislatgors Matter?”American Politics Quarterly21: 102-124.
5.
Berman, David R., and Lawrence L. Martin. 1992. “The New Approach to Economic Development: An Analysis of Innovativeness in the States”. Policy Studies Journal20: 10-21.
6.
Bohm, Robert M.1987. “American Death Penalty Attitudes: A Critical Examination of Recent Evidence”. Criminal Justice and Behavior14: 380-396.
7.
Bohm, Robert M., Louise J. Clark, and Adrian F Aveni. 1991. “Knowledge and Death Penalty Opinion: A Test of the Marshall Hypotheses”. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency28: 360-387.
8.
Call, Jack E., David Nice, and Susette M. Talarico. 1991. “An Analysis of State Rape Shield Laws”. Social Science Quarterly72: 774-788.
9.
Cantril, Hadley1951. Public Opinion: 1935-1946. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Churches and Church Membership in the United States, 1980. 1982. Atlanta, GA: Glenmary Research Center.
11.
Clarke, James W1998. “Without Fear or Shame: Lynching, Capital Punishment and the Subculture of Violence in the American South”. British Journal of Political Science27: 269-289.
12.
Elazar, Daniel J.1966. American Federalism: A Viewfrom the States. New York: Crowell.
13.
Erikson, Robert S.1976. “The Relationship between Public Opinion and State Policy: A New Look Based on Some Forgotten Data”. American Journal of Political Science20: 25-36.
14.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Franklin, Charles H., and Liane C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion”. American Political Science Review83: 751-771.
16.
Furman v. Georgia. 1972. 408 US 238.
17.
Hanson, Russell L.1983. “The Intergovernmental Settings of State Politics”. In Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines, eds., Politics in the American States, 4th edition, pp. 27-56. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
18.
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Jan E. Leighley1992. “The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates”. American Journal of Political Science36: 351-365.
19.
Hofferbert, Richard I.1974. The Study of Public Policy. Indianapolis, IN: BobbsMerrill.
20.
Hofferbert, Richard I., and John K. Urice. 1985. “Small-Scale Policy: The Federal Stimulus versus Competing Explanations for State Funding of the Arts”. American Journal of Political Science29: 308-329.
21.
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Stephen L. Percy1992. “Exploring Variations in State Laws Providing Protection for Persons with Disabilities”. Western Political Quarterly45: 201-220.
22.
Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard G. Niemi. 1974. The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Johnson, Cathy Marie, and Kenneth J. Meier. 1990. “The Wages of Sin: Taxing America's Legal Vices”. Western Political Quarterly43: 577-596.
24.
Jones, Bradford S., and Barbara Norrander. 1996. “The Reliability of Aggregated Public Opinion Measures”. AmericanJournal of Political Science40: 259-309.
25.
Jones, E. Terrence. 1974. “Political Change and Spending Shifts in the American States”. American Politics Quarterly2: 159-178.
26.
Lewin, Tamar. 1995. “Who Decides Who Will Die? Even Within States, It Varies”. New York Times, February 23.
27.
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1977. “The Relative Importance of Socioeconomic and Political Variables for Public Policy”. American Political Science Review71: 559-566.
28.
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of 'Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review19: 79-88.
29.
Lowery, David, and Lee Sigelman. 1982. “Political Culture and State Public Policy: The Missing Link”. Western Political Quarterly35: 376-384.
30.
Marshall, Thomas. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Westchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
31.
Marshall, Thomas. 1997. “Public Opinion and the Supreme Court: The Insulated Court?” In Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox, eds., Understanding Public Opinion. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
32.
Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Paul A. Sabatier. 1980. “A Multivariate Model of Public Policy-Making”. American Journal of Political Science24: 439-468.
33.
Meier, Kenneth J.1992. “The Politics of Drug Abuse: Laws, Implementation, and Consequences”. Western Political Quarterly45: 41-70.
34.
Meier, Kenneth J., and Cathy M. Johnson. 1990. “The Politics of Demon Rum: Regulating Alcohol and Its Deleterious Consequences”. American Politics Quarterly18: 404-429.
35.
Meier, Kenneth J., and Kevin B. Smith. 1994. “Representative Democracy and Representative Bureaucracy: Examining the Top-Down and Bottom-Up Linkages”. Social Science Quarterly75: 790-803.
36.
Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress”. American Political Science Review57: 45-57.
37.
Miller, Warren E., Donald R. Kinder, Steven J. Rosenstone, and the National Election Studies. 1993a. American National Election Study: Pooled Senate Election Study, 1988, 1990, 1992 [Computer file]. 3rd release. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer]. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
38.
Miller, Warren E., Donald R. Kinder, Steven J. Rosenstone, and the National Election Studies. 1993b. American National Election Study, 1992: Preand Post-Election Survey [Computer file]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer]. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
39.
Mooney, Christopher A., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1997. “Morality Policy in Distinctive Political Contexts: The Determinants of Death Penalty Reform in the U.S. States, 1956-1983”. Presented at the XVII World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Seoul, South Korea.
40.
Nice, David C.1991. “The Impact of State Policies to Limit Debt Financing”. Publius21: 69-82.
41.
Nice, David C.1992. “The States and the Death Penalty” Western Political Quarterly45: 1037-1048.
42.
O'Brien, Robert M.1990. “Estimating the Reliability of Aggregate-Level Variables Based on Individual-Level Characteristics”. Sociological Methods and Research18: 473-504.
43.
Plotnick, Robert D., and Richard E Winters. 1985. “A Politico-Economic Theory of Income Redistribution”. American Political Science Review79: 458-473.
44.
Plotnick, Robert D.1990. “Party, Political Liberalism, and Redistribution: An Application to the American States”. American Politics Quarterly18: 430-458.
45.
Rankin, Joseph H.1979. “Changing Attitudes toward Capital Punishment”. Social Forces58: 194-211.
46.
Ringquist, Evan J.1993. “Testing Theories of State Policy-Making: The Case of Air Quality Regulation”. American Politics Quarterly21: 320-342.
47.
Rosenbaum, Walter A.1976. “The Paradoxes of Public Participation”. Administration and Society8: 355-383.
48.
Rosenberg, Tina. 1995. “Deadliest D.A”. New York Times Magazine, July 16.
49.
Rouke, Francis E.1976. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
50.
Sabatier, Paul. 1975. “Social Movements and Regulatory Agencies: Toward a More Adequate-and Less Pessimistic-Theory of Clientele Capture”. Policy Sciences6: 301-342.
51.
Seidman, David. 1975. “Simulation of Public Opinion: A Caveat”. Public Opinion Quarterly39: 331-342.
52.
Sharkansky, Ira. 1967. “Economic and Political Correlates of State Government Expenditures: General Tendencies and Deviant Cases”. Midwest Journal of Political Science11: 173-192.
53.
Sharkansky, Ira. 1969. “The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture”. Polity2: 66-83.
54.
Skalaban, Andrew. 1992. “Interstate Competition and State Strategies to Deregulate Interstate Banking 1982-1988. ”Journal of Politics54: 793-809.
55.
Sullivan, John L.1972. “A Note on Redistributive Politics”. American Political Science Review66: 1301-1305.
56.
Sutton, Richard L.1973. “The States and the People: Measuring and Accounting for 'State Representativeness”. Polity5: 451-476.
57.
Taylor, D. Garth, Kim Lan Scheppele, and Arthur L. Stinchcombe. 1979. “Salience of Crime and Support for Harsher Criminal Sanctions”. Social Problems26: 413-424.
58.
Tompkins, Gary L.1975. “A Causal Model of State Welfare Expenditures”. Journal of Politics37: 392-416.
59.
Tyler, Tom R., and Renee Weber. 1982. “Support for the Death Penalty: Instrumental Response to Crime, or Symbolic Attitude?” Law and Society Review17: 21-45.
60.
U.S. Bureau of Prisons. 1971. Capital Punishment 1930-1970. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1955-1995. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Department of Justice. 1972-95. Capital Punishment. Washington, DC: Govemment Printing Office.
63.
Uslaner, Eric M., and Ronald E. Weber. 1975. “The 'Politics of Redistribution: Toward a Model of the Policy-Making Process in the American States”. American Politics Quarterly3: 130-169.
64.
Vidmar, Neil, and Phoebe Ellsworth. 1974. “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty”. Stanford Law Review26: 1245-1270.
65.
Weber, Ronald E., and William R. Shaffer. 1972. “Public Opinion and American State Policy-Making”. Midwest Journal of Political Science16: 683-699.
66.
Weber, Ronald E., Anne H. Hopkins, Michael L. Mezey, and Frank J. Munger. 1972-73. “Computer Simulation of State Electorates”. Public Opinion Quarterly36: 549-565.
67.
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown.
68.
Winters, Richard. 1976. “Party Control and Policy Change”. AmericanJournal of Political Science20: 597-636.
69.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Fred I. Greenstein. 1969. “Comparing Political Regions: The Case of California”. American Political Science Review63: 74-85.
70.
Wright, Gerald C., Jr., Robert S. Erikson, and John P McIver. 1985. “Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data”. Journal of Politics47: 469-489.
71.
Wright, Gerald C., Jr., Robert S. Erikson, and John P McIver. 1987. “Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States”. AmenicanJournal of Political Science31: 980-1001.
72.
Yang, Bijou, and David Lester. 1989a. “Which States Have a Death Penalty?” Psychological Reports64:1180-1180.
73.
Yang, Bijou, and David Lester. 1989b. “Which States Have the Death Penalty: Data from 1980”. Psychological Reports65: 185-186.
74.
Yang, Bijou, and David Lester. 1990. “Predicting Execution Rates in the United States”. Psychological Reports67: 1146-1146.
