A growing literature suggests that interminority conflict is an increaingly important component of interethnic/interracial dynamics. Intermnority conflict theory predicts: (1) the spatial proximity of ethnic/racial groups is directly related to animosity between the groups and (2) inteminority animosity will be greatest among the poorest segments of the population. Using data from the 1994 Los Angeles Times California Exit Poll and the U.S. Census, I evaluate these hypotheses in the context of African American voting on California's Proposition 187. The data provide no support for the interminority conflict perspective. Proximity to significant Asian populations tended to reduce African American support for 187, while proximity to significant Hispanic populations had no impact on vote choice. Similarly, improvement in personal financial oulook was positively related to support for Proposition 187. These findings insinuate that interminority conflict-at the individual level-may by rarer than the interminority conflict literature suggests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amir, Y.1969. “Contact Hypothesis in Ethnic Relations”. Psychological Bulletin71: 319-342.
2.
Amir, Y.1976. “The Role of Intergroup Contact in Change of Prejudice and Ethnic Relations,” in Phyllis A. Katz, ed., Towards the Elimination of Racism. New York: Pergamon Press.
3.
Berman, David R.1998. Arizona Politics & Government. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
4.
Binder, Norman E., J.L. Polinard, and Robert D. Wrinkle. 1997. “Mexican American and Anglo Attitudes Toward Immigration Reform: A View from the Border”. Social Science Quarterly78: 324-337.
5.
Blumer, H.1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position”. Pacifc Socioloical Review1: 3-7.
6.
Cain, Bruce E., and Gerald C. Lubenow, eds. 1997. Governing California: Politics, Government, & Public Policy in the Golden State. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Government.
7.
California Secretary of State. 1994 California Voter Information: Proposition 187, Illegal Aliens. 1994. http://ca94.election.digital.com/e/prop/187/home.html.
8.
Chang, Edward Tachan. 1990. “Korean-Black Conflict in Los Angeles: Perceptions and Realities”. In Kwang Chung Kim and E.H. Lee, eds., Dreams and Realities. Seoul: Institute of Korea.
9.
Cho, Sumi K.1993. “Korean Americans vs. African Americans: Conflict and Construction,” in Robert Gooding-Williams, ed., Reading Rodney King/Reading Urban Uprising. New York: Routledge.
10.
Citrin, Jack, Beth Reingold, and Donald P Green. 1990. “American Identity and the Politics of Ethnic Change”. Journal of Politics52: 1124-1154.
11.
Citrin, Jack, Donald P Green, Christopher Muste, and Cara Wong. 1997. “Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations”. Journal of Politics59: 858-881.
12.
Cummings, Scott, and Thomas Lambert. 1997. “Anti-Hispanic and Anti-Asian Sentiments among African Americans”. Social Science Quarterly78:338-353.
13.
Davidson, Chandler. 1992. Race & Class in Texas Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
de la Garza, Rodolfo O., Jerry L. Polinard, Robert D. Wrinkle, and Tomas Longoria, Jr. 1991. “Understanding Intra-Ethnic Attitude Variations: Mexican Origin Population Views of Immigration”. Social Science Quarterly72: 379-387.
15.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science, Vol.1, Political Science: Scope and Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
16.
Edmonston, Barry and Jeffrey S. Passel, eds. 1994. Immigration and Ethnicity: The Integration of America's Newest Arrivals. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
17.
Espenshade, Thomas J. and Charles A. Calhoun. 1993. “An Analysis of Public Opinion toward Undocumented Immigration”. Population Research and Policy Review13: 189-224.
18.
Falcón, Ángelo. 1988. “Black and Latino Politics in New York City,” in F Chris Garciá, ed., Latinos in the Political System. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Unversity Press.
19.
Forbes, H.D. 1997. Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Freer, Regina. 1994. “Black-Korean Conflict,” in Mark Baldassare, ed., The Los Angeles Riots. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
21.
Frendreis, John, and Raymond Tatalovich. 1997. “Who Supports English-Only Language Laws? Evidence from the 1992 National Election Study” Social Science Quarterly78: 354-368.
22.
Giles, Michael W1977. “Percent Black and Racial Hostility: An Old Assumption Revisited”. Social Science Quarterly70: 820-835.
23.
Giles, Michael W, and Arthur S. Evans. 1985. “External Threat, Perceived Threat, and Group Identity” Social Science Quarterly66: 50-66.
24.
Giles, Michael W, and Arthur S. Evans. 1986. “The Power Approach to Intergroup Hostility” Journal of Conflict Resolution30: 469-485.
25.
Giles, Michael W and Keanan Hertz. 1994. “Racial Threat and Partisan Identification”. American Political Science Review88: 317-326.
26.
Gimpel, James G., and James R. Edwards, Jr. 1999. The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
Glasser, James M.1994. “Back to the Black Belt: Racial Environment and White Racial Attitudes in the South”. Journal of Politics56: 21-41.
28.
Hernandez, Edward W and J. Gregory Robinson. 1995. Technical Working Paper No.8: “Illustrative Ranges of the Distribution of Undocumented Migrants by State.” U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. Mimeo.
29.
Hood, M.V III, and Irwin L. Morris. 1997. “[UNKNOWN]Amigo o Enemigo?: Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration”. Social Science Quaterly78 (2): 309-323.
30.
Hood, M.V III, and Irwin L. Morris. 1998. “Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor,... But Make Sure They Have a Green Card: The Effects of Documented and Undocumented Migrant Cotext on Anglo Opinion Toward Immigration”. Political BehaviorMarch: 1-15.
31.
Hood, M.V III, and Irwin L. Morris. 2000. Analyzing Anglo Voting on Proposition 187: Does Racial/Ethnic Context Really Matter?-A Research Note. Social Science Quarterly. Spring.
32.
Hood, M.V III, Irwin L. Morris, and Kurt Shirkey. 1997. “¡Quedate o Vente!: Uncovering the Determinants of Hispanic Public Opinion toward Immigration”. Political Research Quarterly. 50 (3): 627-648.
33.
Hoskin, Marilyn and William Mishler. 1983. “Public Opinion toward New Migrants: A Comparative”. International Migration21: 440-462.
34.
Houston Chronicle. 1996. Houston Chronicle Immigration Survey, August 5-21.
35.
Huckshorn, Robert J.1998. Government & Politics in Florida. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
36.
Huddy, Leonie and David O. Sears. 1990. “Qualified Public Support for: Some Policy Implications”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science508: 119-134.
37.
Huddy, Leonie and David O. Sears. 1995. “Opposition to Bilingual Education: Prejudice of the Defense of Realistic Interests?” Social Psychology Quarterly58: 133-143.
38.
Jackman, M.R., and M. Crane. 1986. “Some of My Best Friends are Black...: Interracial Friendship and Whites' Racial Attitudes.” PublicOpinion Quarterly50: 459-486.
39.
Johnson, James H. Jr., and Melvin L. Oliver. 1994. “Interethnic Minority Conflict in Urban America: The Effects of Economic and Social Dislocations,” in Fred L. Pincus and Howard J. Ehrlich, ed., Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40.
Kennedy, Peter. 1992. A Guide to Econometrics. 3rd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Key, VO. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.
42.
Kinder, Donald R., and Tali Mendelberg. 1995. “Cracks in American Apartheid: The Political Impact of Prejudice among Desegregated Whites”. Journal of Politics57: 402-424.
43.
King, Gary, Robert 0. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Lawrence, David. 1995. California: The Politics of Diversity. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
45.
MacManus, Susan and Carol Cassel. 1982. “Mexican Americans in City Politics: Participation, Representation, and Policy Preferences”. Urban Interest4: 57-69.
46.
McClain, Paula. 1993. “The Chaning Dynamics of Urban Politics: Black and Hispanic Municipal Employment-Is There Competition?” Journal of Politics55: 399-414.
47.
McClain, Paula, and Albert Karnig. 1990. “Black and Hispanic Government and Political Competition”. American Political Science Review84: 535-555.
48.
McClain, Paula, and Joseph Stewart Jr. 1995. “Can We All Get Along?” Racial and Ethnic Minorities in American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
49.
McClain, Paula, and Steven C. Tauber. 1998. “Black and Latino Socieconomic and Political Competition: Has a Decade Made a Difference”. American Poltics Quarterly26(2): 101-116.
50.
Meier, Kenneth, and Joseph Stewart. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
51.
Miller, Lawrence W, Jerry L. Polinard, and Robert D. Wrinkle. 1984. “Attitudes toward Undocumented Workers: The Mexican American Perspective”. Social Science Quarterly65: 482-494.
52.
Moore, S.1986. “Social Scientists' Views on Immigrants and U.S. Immigration Policy: A Postscript,” inThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 487. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
Newton, Lin Yvette. 1997. “Economic Self-Interest vs. Ethnic Identity: Analyzing Latino Voting on Proposition 187 in California.”Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestem Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
54.
Oliver, Melvin L., and James H. Johnson, Jr. 1984. “Inter-ethnic Conflict in an Urban Ghetto: The Case of Blacks and Latinos in Los Angeles”. Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change6: 57-94.
55.
Olzak, Susan. 1992. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
Polinard, Jerry L., Robert D. Wrinkle, and Rodolfo de la Garza. 1984. “Attitudes of Mexican Americans toward Irregular Mexican Immigration”. International Migration Review18: 782-799.
57.
Quinton, Wendy J., Gloria Cowan, and Brett D. Watson. 1996. Personality and Attitudinal Predictors of Support of Proposition 187-California's AntiIllegal Immigrant Initiative. Journal of Applied Social Psychology24: 2204-2223.
58.
Rothbart, Myron, and Oliver P John. 1993. “Intergroup Relations and Stereotype Change: A Social-Cognitive Analysis and Some Longitudinal Findings”. Chapter 2 in Paul M. Sniderman, Philip E. Tetlock, and Edward G. Carmines, eds, Prejudice, Politics, and the American Dilemma. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59.
Sherif, M., and C. Sherif. 1953. Groups in Harmony and Tension. New York: Harper.
60.
Sidanius, James. 1993. “The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression”. Chapter 7 in Shanto Iyengar and William J. McGuire, eds., Explorations in Political Psychology, Ch. 7. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
61.
Sigelman, Lee, Timothy Bledsoe, Susan Welch, and Michael Combs. 1996. “Making Contact? Black-White Social Interactionsin an Urban Setting”. AmericanJournal of Sociology. 101:1306-1328.
62.
Sigelman, Lee and Susan Welch. 1993. “The Contact Hypothesis Revisited: Blac-White Interaction and Positive Racial Attitudes”. Social Forces. 71: 781-796.
63.
Sleeper, Jim. 1991. Closest of Strangers: Liberalism & the Politics of Race in New York. New York: Norton.
64.
Sonenshein, Raphael J.1990. “Biracial Coalition Politics in Los Angeles,” in Rufus B. Browning, Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb, eds., Racial Politics in American Cities. New York: Longman.
65.
Sonenshein, Raphael J.1993. Politics in Black and White: Race and Power in Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
Starr, Paul D., and Alden E. Roberts. 1982. “Attitudes toward New Americans: Perceptions of Indo-Chinese in Nine Cities”. Research in Race and Ethnic Relations3: 165-186.
67.
Stein, Robert M., Stephanie Shirley Post, and Allison L. Rinden. 1997a. “Attitude Accessibility and Anglo-American Opinions on Immigration Policy”Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Assocation, Chicago, IL.
68.
Stein, Robert M., Stephanie Shirley Post, and Allison L. Rinden. 1997b. “The Effect of Contact and Context on White Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration Policy”Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
69.
Stephan, WG. 1985. “Intergroup Relations,” in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, eds., Handbook of Social Psychology. 3rd ed., vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
70.
Tolbert, Caroline J., and Rodney E. Hero. 1996. “Race/Ethnicity and Direct Democracy: An Analysis of California's Illegal Immigration Initiative”. Journal of Politics58: 806-818.
71.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1994. Summary of Population and Housing Characteristics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
72.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1996a “Reported Voting and Registration, by Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin, for States: November 1994.” http://wwwcensus.gov/population/socdemo/voting/work/tabO4.txt.
73.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1996b. “Reported Voting and Registration, by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Age for States: November 1994.” http://wwwcensus.gov/population/socdemo/voting/work/tabO4a.txt.
74.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of the Census. 1996c. “Reported Voting and Registration, by Race, Hispanic Origin, and Income: November 1994.” http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/voting/work/tab13.txt.
75.
Van den Berghe, P1967. Race and Racism. A Comparative Perspective. New York: Wiley
76.
Welch, Susan, Albert K. Karnig, and Richard A. Eribes. 1983. “Changes in Hispanic Local Employment in the Southwest”. Western Political Quarterly36: 660-673.
77.
Wright, Gerald C.1977. “Contextual Models of Electoral Behavior: The Southern Wallace Vote”. American Political Science Review71: 497-508.
