BurnsC. M.VicenteK. J. (1995). A framework for understanding interdisciplinary interactions in design. In Proceedings of DIS ′95: Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 97–103). New York: ACM Press.
2.
ChapanisA. (1967). The relevance of laboratory studies to practical situations. Ergonomics, 10, 557–577.
3.
LindblomC. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19, 78–88.
4.
MeisterD.FarrD. E. (1967). The utilization of human factors information by designers. Human Factors, 9, 71–87.
5.
RittelH. W.JWebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
6.
RouseW. B. (1985). On better mousetraps and basic research: Getting the applied world to the laboratory door. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15, 2–8.
7.
SimonC. W. (1987). Will egg-sucking ever become a science? Human Factors Society Bulletin, 30(6), 1–4.
8.
VicenteK. J.BurnsC. MPawlakW. S. (1993). Egg-sucking, mousetraps, and the Tower of Babel: Making human factors guidance more accessible to designers (CEL 93–01). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto, Cognitive Engineering Laboratory.
