This article highlights the importance of integrating human-centricity into India’s Defence Sector. The paper is a contribution to strategic Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE). It highlights directions that can ensure systematic and systemic embedding of Human-Centred Design (HCD), Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE), and Human Systems Integration (HSI) within the Indian defence sector. It does so by first identifying the current challenges that limit the adoption of human-centricity and then offering a set of recommendations to address them. The proposed measures span across multiple levels of engagement involving government institutions, industry, academia, and the Indian armed forces.
BeheraL. K. (2016). Indian defence industry: An agenda for making in IndiaInstitute for Defence Studies and Analyses.
4.
BeheraL. K. (2019). Indian defence industry: Will ‘Make in India’ turn it around? In Hartley, K., & Belin, J. (Eds.). The economics of the global defence industry (pp. 506–526). Routledge.
BeheraL. K. (2021b). India’s defence economy: Planning, budgeting, industry, and procurement. Routledge.
7.
BeheraL. K. (2022a). Examining India’s defence innovation performance. In CheungT.M. (Ed.), Comparing Defense Innovation Around the World (pp. 99–122). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003325055
8.
BeheraL. K. (2022b). India: Modernising the Indian army. Asia Pacific Defence Reporter, 48(7), 68.
9.
BeheraL. K. (2023). The state of India’s public sector defence industry. In The state of India’s public sector defence industry: Behera, laxman kumar: Observer Research Foundation.
HandleyH. A. H.SeeJ. E.Savage‐KnepshieldP. A. (2024). Human readiness levels and human views as tools for user‐centered design. Systems Engineering, 27(6), 1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21773
KantV. (2023). The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak?’: Systemic unknown-knowns for ergonomics in India. Ergonomics, 66(9), 1382–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2149851
LyonsJ. W.LongD.ChaitR. (2006). Critical technology events in the development of the Stinger and Javelin missile systems: Project hindsight revisited. Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University. Accessed on 22 March 22, 2026.Accessed from. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/DefenseTechnologyPapers/DTP-033.pdf
PromiselD. M.HartelC. R.KaplanJ. D.MarcusA.WhittenburgJ. A. (1985). Reverse engineering: Human factors, manpower, personnel, and training in the weapon system acquisition process. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Accessed on 22 March 22, 2026.Accessed from. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/DefenseTechnologyPapers/DTP-033.pdf
25.
RossiterA.CannonB. J. (2019). Making arms in India? Examining New Delhi’s renewed drive for defence-industrial indigenization. Defence Studies, 19(4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1685880
26.
SalazarG.SeeJ. E.HandleyH. A. H.CraftR. (2020). Understanding human readiness levels. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, 64(1), 1765–1769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641427
27.
Savage-KnepshieldP. A.HernandezC. L.SinesS. O. (2021). Exploring the synergy between human systems integration and human readiness levels: A retrospective analysis. Ergonomics in Design, 29(4), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211009718
28.
SchwartzB.DodsonJ. E. (2021). Human readiness levels promote effective system integration. Ergonomics in Design, 29(4), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211021250
SeeJ. E.CraftR.MorrisJ.NewtonV. (2017). Incorporating human readiness levels at Sandia National Laboratories. In 2017 Resilience Week (RWS) (pp. 150–153). IEEE. DOI:10.1109/RWEEK.2017.8088664
