Satellite ground stations are crucial to space operations, yet the standardization of their systems and human-centered interfaces remains insufficient. This article highlights the importance of improving the design of operator interfaces and the challenges faced by operators in high-stakes environments. While AstroUX offers a structured approach to enhancing usability, its limitations prevent it from being fully effective in real-world scenarios. Further research is needed to understand the cognitive demands, workload, and performance factors of operators, which will ultimately help optimize their efficiency and reduce human error in satellite operations.
BentleyM. J.LinA. C.HodsonD. D. (2017). Overcoming challenges to Air Force satellite ground control automation. In 2017 IEEE conference on cognitive and computational aspects of situation management (CogSIMA) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
4.
CowanN. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277
EndsleyM. R. (2018). From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human–automation research. Human Factors, 60(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816681350
7.
FullerD. (2002). Crew resource management in satellite operations: Methods to reduce human performance error. In 20th AIAA International communication satellite systems conference and exhibit.
8.
GauglitzS.HöllererT.TurkM. (2014). Evaluation of the effects of head-worn augmented reality on task performance in naturalistic conditions. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST).
9.
HeinrichG. I.McAndrewI.PrettyJ. (2021). Human factors considerations in satellite operations human-computer interaction technologies: A review of current applications and theory. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 13(03), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2021.13303
10.
JonesP. M.MitchellC. M. (1991). Human-computer cooperative problem solving in satellite ground control. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 35(5), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129103500536
11.
KujalaS. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290301782
NormanD. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Addison-Wesley.
14.
RensinkR. A.O’ReganJ. k.ClarkJ. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x
15.
SonnenwaldD. H. (2016). Exploring theory development: Learning from diverse masters. In Theory Development in the Information Sciences (pp. 1–20). University of Texas Press.
