Global warming has not been a major focus of human factors/ergonomics (HF/E), but interest in the problem and in the question of what HF/E professionals might have to contribute to its solution or to the mitigation of undesirable effects appears to be growing. Here I note three ways in which HF/E science is well positioned to contribute: promotion of a systems-approach perspective, development of effective tools for dealing with the problem, and performance of focused behavioral research.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.
2.
BielloD. (2009). Can videoconferencing replace travel?Scientific American. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1oDIag5
3.
BryneM. D.PewR. W. (2009). A history and primer of human performance modeling. In DursoFrancis T. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 5, pp. 225–263). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
4.
ClémenconR. (1995). Global climate change and the trade system: Bridging the culture gap. Journal of Environment and Development, 4, 29–51.
5.
FayM. J.KlineS. L. (2011). Intensity telecommuting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39, 144–163.
6.
GajendranR. S.HarrisonD. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541.
7.
GoldenT. D.VeigaJ. F.DinoR. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter?Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412–1421.
8.
GrenvilleD.KleinerB. M.DensonM.AndersonS. (2000). Human factors issues in video teleconference meeting performance: A case study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting (pp. 223–226). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9.
InmanM. (2013). The true cost of fossil fuels. Scientific American, 308(4), 58–61.
10.
KazdinA. E. (2009). Psychological science’s contributions to a sustainable environment. American Psychologist, 64, 339–356.
11.
KobusC. B. A.MuggeR.SchoormansJ. P. L. (2013). Washing when the sun is shining! How users interact with a household energy management system. Ergonomics, 56, 451–462.
12.
LowryR.PetersonM. (2012). Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 11, 258–279.
13.
MartinK.LeggS.BrownC. (2013). Designing for sustainability: Ergonomics—carpe diem. Ergonomics, 56, 365–388.
14.
MolinaM. J.RowlandF. S. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine atom catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature, 249, 810–812.
15.
MooreD.BarnardT. (2012). With eloquence and humanity? Human factors/ergonomics in sustainable human development. Human Factors, 54, 940–951.
16.
MorayN. (1993). Technosophy and humane factors. Ergonomics in Design, 1(4), 33–39.
17.
MosierK.FischerU. M. (2010) Judgment and decision making by individuals and teams: Issues, models, and applications. In HarrisD. H. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 6, pp. 198–255). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18.
NickersonR. S. (2003). Psychology and environmental change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
NickersonR. S. (2007). Protection of the environment. In DursoF.(Sr. Ed.)NickersonR. S.DumaisS. T.LewandowskyS.PerfectT. (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 713–738). New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
PaulL.JohnsonA. O.CranstonM. (2000). A successful videoconference satellite program: Providing nutritional information on dementia to rural caregivers. Educational Gerontology, 26, 415–426.
21.
PefferT.PerryD.PritoniM.AragonC.MeierA. K. (2013). Facilitating energy savings with programmable thermostats: Evaluation and guidelines for thermostat user interface. Ergonomics, 56, 463–479.
22.
PioreA. (2012). The ultimate sustainability index. Scientific American, 307(6), 40–41.
23.
ReckienD.EisenackK. (2013). Climate change gaming on board and screen: A review. Simulation and Gaming, 44, 253–271.
24.
RosentraterL. D.SaelensmindeI.EckströmF.BöhmG.BostromA.HanssD.O’ConnerR. E. (2012). Efficacy trade-offs in individuals’ support for climate change policies. Environment and Behavior, 45, 935–970.
25.
SalasE.CookeN. J.RosenM. A. (2008). On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50, 540–547.
26.
StedmonA. W.WinslowR.LangleyA. (2013). Micro-generation schemes: User behaviours and attitudes towards energy consumption. Ergonomics, 56, 440–450.
27.
SternP. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269–302.
28.
StrengersY. (2011). Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 319–338.
29.
Taylor-BrownP.HannonD. (2012). An exploration into framing effects and user preferences: Implications for the design of energy feedback interfaces. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting (pp. 661–665). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
30.
TennerE. (1997). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York, NY: Vintage.
31.
VicenteK. J. (1998). Human factors and global problems: A systems approach. Systems Engineering, 1, 57–69.
32.
Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. (2012). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in September 2012. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1oRIDxl.
