In this article the authors illustrate how individual expert ratings can be employed to prioritize specifications for use in forced rankings. Those rankings are then used to select a design with the best overall usability. The authors provide an example of this approach in the selection of a medical transport vehicle seat to produce a more ergonomic product that could improve patient outcomes and driver safety.
CookeR. M. (1991). Experts in uncertainty: Opinion and subjective probability in science. Environmental ethics and science policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
GroteR. (2005). Forced ranking: Making performance management work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
JiaoJ.TsengM. (1998). Fuzzy ranking for concept evaluation in configuration design for mass customization. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application, 6, 189–206.
6.
LiM.SmidtsC. S. (2003). A ranking of software engineering measures based on expert opinion. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29, 811–824.
7.
LundA. M. (1997). Expert ratings of usability maxims. Ergonomics in Design, 5(3), 15–20.
8.
MartinJ.MurphyE.CroweJ.NorrisB. (2006). Capturing user requirements in medical device development: The role of ergonomics. Physiological Measurement, 27(8), R49–R62.
9.
MeisterD. (1985). Behavioral analysis and measurement methods. New York: Wiley.
10.
TilleyA. (1993). Themeasure of man and woman: Human factors in design. New York: Henry Dreyfuss Associates, Whitney Library of Design.
11.
van LamsweerdeA. (2001). Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. Presented at the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, RE’01, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
