This article provides a short overview of driver workload, including some background on guidelines from the Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers. In addition, a brief review of General Motors’ processes to assess driver workload and verify secondary systems and features for communication, navigation, and/or interactive information and data on some current features are included.
DingusT. A.KlauerS. G.NealeV. L.PetersenA.LeeS. E.SudweeksJ.PerezM. A.HankeyJ.RamseyD.GuptaS.BucherC.DoerzaphZ. R.JermelandJ.KniplingR. R. (2006). The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study: Phase II. Results of the 100-car field experiment (Interim Project Report for DTNH22-00-C-07007, Task Order 6, Report No. DOT HS 810 593). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
4.
Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. (2006). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems including 2006 updated sections. Washington, DC: Alliance of Automotive Manufactur-ers. Retrieved from http://www.autoalliance.org/files/DriverFocus.pdf
5.
PerezM.ViitaD.TenglerS.Voran-NowakS. (2011, February). Nomadic and embedded navigation system evaluation based on user performance in destination entry and navigation tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
