New technologies and devices inside the automobile can compete for drivers’ limited attention, raising concerns about driver distraction. This article provides a short overview of some of the issues surrounding in-vehicle tasks, particularly their impact on visual scanning and driving performance. Evidence from a variety of experimental approaches offers key scientific findings that form the basis for taking action to prevent and manage distraction – through the design of products, advanced technology, legislation, and education and training applications.
CairdJ. K.WillnessC. R.SteelP.ScialfaC. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1282–1293.
2.
CarstenO.BrookhuisK. (2005). The relationship between distraction and driving performance: Towards a test regime for in-vehicle information systems. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 75–77.
3.
HoskingS. G.YoungK. L.ReganM. A. (2009). The effects of text messaging on young drivers. Human Factors, 51, 582–592.
4.
ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (2009). Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5.
StrayerD. L.DrewsF. A. (2007). Cell-phone induced inattention blindness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.
6.
AngellL.AuflickJ.AustriaP. A.KochharD.TijerinaL.BieverW.. (2006). Driver workload metrics Task 2 final report and appendices (Report No. DOT HS 810 635). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
7.
BurnsP.HarblukJ.FoleyJ. P.AngellL. (2010). The importance of task duration and related measures in assessing the distraction potential of in-vehicle tasks. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2010; pp. 12–19). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
8.
ChisholmS. L.CairdJ. K.LockhartJ. (2008). The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 704–713.
9.
DingusT. A.HanowskiR. J.KlauerS. G. (2011). Estimating crash risk. Ergonomics in Design, 19(4), 8–12, this issue.
10.
HancockP. A.MoulouaM.SendersJ. W. (2009). On the philosophical foundations of the distracted driver and driving distraction. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 11–30). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
11.
HarblukJ. L.NoyY. I.TrbovichP. L.EizenmanM. (2007). An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 372–379.
12.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2004). Driving and side task performance: The effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Human Factors,46, 611–624.
13.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196–205.
14.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2007). In-vehicle glance duration: Distributions, tails and model of crash risk. Transportation Research Record, 2018, 22–28.
15.
KlauerS. G.DingusT. A.NealeV. L.SudweeksJ. D.RamseyD. J. (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study data (Report No. DOT HS 810 594). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
16.
LansdownT. C. (2002). Individual differences during driver secondary task performance: Verbal protocol and visual allocation findings. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34, 655–662.
17.
LeeJ. D. (2009, September/October). Distraction and inattention. Presentation to the 2009 Distracted Driving Summit. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
18.
LeeJ. D.YoungK. L.ReganM. A. (2009). Defining driver distraction. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 31–40). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
19.
OwensJ. M.McLaughlinS. B.SudweeksJ. (2010). On-road comparison of driving performance measures when using handheld and voice-control interfaces for mobile phones and portable music players. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 3, 734–743.
20.
RecarteM. A.NunesL. M. (2000). Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 31–43.
21.
SimonH. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.
22.
SimonsD. J.ChabrisC. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.
23.
StuttsJ. C.FeaganesJ.ReinfurtD.RodgmanE.HamlettC.MeadowsT.. (2003). Distractions in everyday driving. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
24.
TijerinaL.ParmerE.GoodmanM. J. (1998). Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving: A test track study. In Proceedings of the 5th ITS World Congress (CD-ROM). Seoul, South Korea: ITS World Congress.
25.
TsimhoniO.SmithD.GreenP. (2004). Address entry while driving: Speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors, 46, 600–610.
26.
VictorT. W.HarblukJ. L.EngströmJ. A. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 167–190.
27.
WickensC. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159−177.
