This article discusses trends in forensic ergonomics from the author’s historical perspective. His premise is that two dominant forces converged in the United States over the past four decades to allow the specialty to emerge, namely, new government legislation and entrepreneurial opportunities for ergonomists in the private sector. He concludes that public policy initiatives, evolving legislation, laws, and the inevitable resulting lawsuits in the coming decades will shape the direction of forensic ergonomics.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as Amended, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. (2008).
2.
BakkenG. M.CohenH. H.AbeleJ. R.HydeA. S.LaRueC. A. (2007). Slips, trips, missteps and their consequences. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges.
3.
CohenH. H.ArndtS.RhoadesT.VigilanteW. (2009). Forensic human factors/ergonomics practice from the perspective of the forensic consulting firms. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53rd Annual Meeting (pp. 546–548). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
4.
CohenH. H.WoodsonW. E. (2005). Principles of forensic human factors/ergonomics. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges.
5.
DewarR.OlsonP. (2007). Human factors in traffic safety (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges.
6.
NaderR. (1965). Unsafe at any speed. New York: Grossman.
7.
NemireK. (2004). The forensic human factors consultant. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 1145–1149). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
8.
OlsonP. L.FarberE. (2003). Forensic aspects of driver perception and response (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges.
9.
RudovM. H.CohenH. H. (2009). The practice of forensic human factors/ergonomics and related safety professions. Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges.
10.
WogalterM. S. (2006). The handbook of warnings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
