Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A theory of why users and display designers prefer highly realistic, supposedly intuitive displays despite their poor performance.

Keywords

displays design principles perception folk beliefs 3-D displays change detection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andre

A. D.

Wickens

C. D.

(1995, Fall). When users want what's NOT best for them Ergonomics in Design, 3, 10–14.

Ballard

Hayhoe

Pook

Rao

(1998). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723–767.

Benford

S. D.

Greenhalgh

C. M.

Rodden

Pycock

(2001). Collaborative virtual environments Communications of the ACM, 44, 79–85.

Cavanagh

(1995). Guest editorial: Vision is getting easier every day Perception, 24, 1227–1232.

Cutting

J. E.

(2003). Reconceiving perceptual space. In Hecht

Schwartz

Atherton

, Looking into pictures: An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space (pp. 215–238). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Dennehy

M. T.

Nesbitt

D. W.

Sumey

R. A.

(1994). Real-time three-dimensional graphics display for antiair warfare command and control Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 15, 110–119.

DiVita

Obermayer

Nugent

Linville

J. M.

(2004). Verification of the change blindness phenomenon while managing critical events on a combat information display Human Factors, 46, 205–218.

Ellis

S. R.

(1993). Pictorial communication: Pictures and the synthetic universe. In Ellis

S. R.

Kaiser

Grunwald

A. J.

, Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 22–40). London: Taylor & Francis.

Frisby

J. P.

(1980). Seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10.

Gray

W. D.

(2002). Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2, 205–227.

11.

Hegarty

Kriz

Cate

(2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325–360.

12.

Hollan

J. D.

Stornetta

(1992). Beyond being there. In Proceedings of ACM CHI1992 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Perspectives on the Design of Collaborative Systems (pp. 119–125). New York: ACM Press.

13.

Hutchins

E. L.

Hollan

J. D.

Norman

D. A.

(1985). Direct manipulation interfaces Human Computer Interaction, 1(4), 311–338.

14.

Jordan

P. W.

(2000). Designing pleasurable products. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.

15.

Levin

D. T.

(2003). Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge: MIT Press.

16.

MacLeod

D. I. A.

Willen

J. D.

(1995). Is there a visual space? In Luce

R. D.

D'Zmura

M. D.

Hoffman

D. D.

Iverson

G. J.

Romney

A. K.

, Geometric representations of perceptual phenomena: Papers in honor of Tarow Indow on his 70th (pp. 47–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Marr

(1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

18.

Norman

D. A.

(2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

19.

O'Regan

J. K.

(1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461–488.

20.

Payne

S. J.

(1995). Naive judgments of stimulus-response compatibility Human Factors, 37, 495–506.

21.

Pylyshyn

(2003). Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

22.

Ramachandran

V. S.

(1988). Perception of shape from shading Nature, 331, 163–166.

23.

Roscoe

S. N.

(1968). Airborne displays for flight and navigation. Human Factors, 10, 321–332.

24.

Roscoe

S. N.

(2004). Moving horizons, control reversals, and graveyard spirals Ergonomics in Design, 12(4), 15–19.

25.

Schachter

D. L.

(1966). Searching for memory. New York: Basic Books.

26.

Sedgwick

H. A.

(1986). In Boff

K. R.

Kaufman

Thomas

J. P.

, Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 1 (pp. 2101–2157). New York: Wiley.

27.

Simons

D. J.

Levin

D. T.

(1998). Failure to detect changes in people in real-world interactions Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644–649.

28.

Smallman

H. S.

Manes

D. I.

Cowen

M. B.

(2003). Measuring and modeling the misinterpretation of 3-D perspective views. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1615–1619). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.

29.

Smallman

H. S.

Oonk

H. M.

St. John

Cowen

M. B.

(2001). Searching for tracks imaged as symbols or realistic icons: A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays (Technical Report 1854). San Diego: SPAWAR Systems Center.

30.

Smallman

H. S.

St. John

(2003). CHEX (Change History EXplicit): New HCl concepts for change awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 528–532). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.

31.

Smallman

H. S.

St. John

Cowen

M. B.

(2002). Use and misuse of linear perspective in the perceptual reconstruction of 3-D perspective view displays. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 1560–1564). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.

32.

Smallman

H. S.

St. John

Oonk

H. M.

Cowen

M. B.

(2000). When beauty is only skin deep: 3-D realistic icons are harder to identify than conventional 2-D military symbols. In Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association XIVth Triennial Congress/Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting (pp. 3.480–3.483). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.

33.

Smallman

H. S.

St. John

Oonk

H. M.

Cowen

M. B.

(2001a). Information availability in 2D and 3D displays IEEE: Computer Graphics and Application, 21, 51–57.

34.

Smallman

H. S.

St. John

Oonk

H. M.

Cowen

M. B.

(2001b). “SYMBICONS”: A hybrid symbology that combines the best elements of SYMBols and ICONS. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 110–114). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.

35.

St. John

Cowen

M. B.

Smallman

H. S.

Oonk

H. M.

(2001). The use of 2-D and 3-D displays for shape understanding vs. relative position tasks Human Factors, 43, 79–98.

36.

St. John

Smallman

H. S.

Manes

D. I.

(in press). Recovery from interruptions to a dynamic monitoring task: The beguiling utility of instant replay. Paper accepted for presentation at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, September 26–30.

37.

Sutherland

I. F.

(1965). The ultimate display. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Congress 2 (pp. 506–508). Laxenburg, Austria: IFIP Press.

38.

Tufte

E. R.

(1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

39.

Tversky

Morrison

J. B.

Betrancourt

(2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.

40.

Varakin

D. A.

Levin

D. T.

Fidler

(2004). Unseen and unaware: Implications of recent research on failures of visual awareness for human-computer interface design Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 389–422.

41.

Wells

G. L.

Loftus

E. F.

(2002). Eyewitness memory for people and events. In Goldstein

, Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 11, Forensic psychology (pp. 149–160). New York: Wiley.

Naive Realism: Misplaced Faith in Realistic Displays

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References