Research studies that fail to recognize the importance of participant age classifications might lead to erroneous conclusions about user behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
CraikF. I. M.SalthouseT. A.(2000).The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJErlbaum
3.
FozardJ. L.(1990).Vision and hearing in aging In BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 150–170). New York: Academic
4.
HertzogC.(1996).Research design in studies of aging and cognition In BirrenJ. E.SchaieK. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 24–37). San Diego: Academic
5.
RabbittP. M. A.(1992).Cognitive changes with age must influence human factors design In BoumaH.GraafmansJ. A. M. (Eds.), Gerontechnology (pp. 113–140). Amsterdam: IOS Press
6.
SalthouseT. A.(2000).Methodological assumptions in cognitive aging research In CraikF. I. M.SalthouseT. A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 467–498). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
7.
SchaieK. W.(1993).Ageist language in psychological researchAmerican Psychologist, 48(1), 49–51
8.
SchneiderB. A.Pichora-FullerM. K.(2000).Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research In CraikF. I. M.Salt-houseT. A. (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155–219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
