BauckhamRichard. 1994. “The Brothers and Sisters of Jesus: An Epiphanian Response to John P. Meier.”Catholic Biblical Quarterly56: 687–700.
2.
BauckhamRichard. 1990. Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church.Edinburgh: T and T Clark.
3.
BlackDavid Alan, ed. 2008. Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: 4 Views.Nashville: B and H Academic.
4.
BockDarrell L.2006. The Missing Gospels: Unearthing the Truth Behind Alternative Christianities.Nashville: Nelson Books.
5.
BockmuehlMarkus. 2011. “The Son of David and His Mother.”Journal of Theological Studies62: 476–93.
6.
BockmuehlMarkus. 2017. Ancient Apocryphal Gospels.Interpretation: Resources for the Use of Scripture in the Church. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
7.
BovonFrancois. 1991. “The Suspension of Time in Chapter 18 of Protevangelium Jacobi.” In PearsonB. A., ed., The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester, 393–405. Minneapolis: Fortress.
8.
BrueggemannWalter. 2003. An Introduction to the Old Testament: The Canon and Christian Imagination.First edition. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.
9.
ByrskogSamuel. 2000. Story as History—History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 123. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).
10.
CartlidgeDavid R., and ElliottJ. K.2001. Art and the Christian Apocrypha.London/New York: Routledge.
11.
ChapmanD. J.1913. “On the Decretum Gelasianum De Libris Recipiendis et non Recipiendis.”Revue Bénédictine30: 187–208, 315–33.
12.
ConstasNicholas. 2003. Proclus of Constantinople and the Cult of the Virgin in Late Antiquity: Homilies 1–5, Texts and Translations. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 66. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
13.
de StryckerÉmile. 1961. La forme la plus ancienne du Protévangile de Jacques. Subsidia Hagiographica 33. Bruxelles: Société des Bollandistes.
14.
de StryckerÉmile. 1980. “Die griechischen Handschriften des Protevangeliums Iacobi.” In D. Harlfinger, ed., Griechische Kodikologie und Textüberlieferung, 577–612. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
15.
EhrmanBart D., and PlešeZlatko, eds. 2011. The Apocryphal Gospels: Texts and Translations.New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
EhrmanBart D., and PlešeZlatko, eds. 2014. The Other Gospels: Accounts of Jesus from Outside the New Testament.New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
FreyJörg. 2011. “How Could Mark and John Do Without Infancy Stories?” In C. Clivaz et al., eds., Infancy Gospels: Stories and Identities, 189–215. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 281. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
18.
FreyJörg. 2012. “B.VI.1 Das Freer-Logion.” In C. Markschies and J. Schröter, eds., Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung, 1.1–2 (Evangelien und Verwandtes): 1059–61. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
19.
GnilkaJoachim. 2007. Die Nazarener und der Koran: Eine Spurensuche.Freiburg: Herder.
20.
GrossiVittorino. 2001. “Il ‘Decretum Gelasianum’: Nota in margine all'autorità della Chiesa di Roma alla fine del sec. V.”Augustinianum:231–55.
21.
HeckelTheo K.1999. Vom Evangelium des Markus zum viergestaltigen Evangelium. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 120. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
22.
HockRonald F.1995. The Infancy Gospels of James and Thomas: With Introduction, Notes, and Original Text Featuring the New Scholars Version Translation. The Scholars Bible 2. Santa Rosa: Polebridge.
23.
IlanTal. 1997. Mine and Yours Are Hers: Retrieving Women's History from Rabbinic Literature. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 41. Leiden/New York: Brill.
24.
JenkinsPhilip. 2001. Hidden Gospels: How the Search for Jesus Lost Its Way.Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
JensenRobin M.2015. “The Apocryphal Mary in Early Christian Art.” In GregoryA. and TuckettC., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Apocrypha, 289–305. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
KelhofferJames A.2000. Miracle and Mission: The Authentication of Missionaries and their Message in the Longer Ending of Mark. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2:112. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
27.
KirkAlan. 2007. “Tradition and Memory in the Gospel of Peter.” In KrausT. J. and NicklasT., eds., Das Evangelium nach Petrus: Text, Kontexte, Intertexte, 135–58. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur 158. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
28.
Lambers-PetryDoris. 2003. “Verwandte Jesu als Referenzpersonen für das Judenchristentum.” In P. J. Tomson and D. Lambers-Petry, eds., The Image of the Judaeo-Christians in Ancient Jewish and Christian Literature, 32–52. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 158. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
29.
LevinYigal. 2006. “Jesus, ‘Son of God’ and ‘Son of David’: The ‘Adoption'of Jesus into the Davidic Line.”Journal for the Study of the New Testament28, no. 4: 415–42.
30.
LutherMartin. 1883–2009. D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe120 vols. Weimar: H. Böhlau.
31.
LutherMartin. 1955–1986. Luther's Works, ed. PelikanJ.55 vols. American Edition. Saint Louis: Concordia.
32.
MarkschiesChristoph, SchröterJens, and HeiserAndreas. 2012. Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung. Vol. 1.1–2: Evangelien und Verwandtes. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
33.
NajmanHindy. 2003. Seconding Sinai: The Development of Mosaic Discourse in Second Temple Judaism. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 77. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
34.
NajmanHindy. 2010. Past Renewals: Interpretative Authority, Renewed Revelation, and the Quest for Perfection in Jewish Antiquity. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 53. Leiden, etc.: Brill.
35.
NajmanHindy. 2012a. “Configuring the Text in Biblical Studies.” In E. F. Mason et al., eds., A Teacher for All Generations: Essays in Honor of James C. VanderKam, 3–22. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 153. Leiden: Brill.
36.
NajmanHindy. 2012b. “The Vitality of Scripture Within and Beyond the ‘Canon.’”Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period43: 497–518.
37.
NutzmanMegan. 2013. “Mary in the Protevangelium of James: A Jewish Woman in the Temple?”Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies53: 551–78.
38.
OngWalter J.1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word.London and New York: Routledge.
39.
PellegriniSilvia. 2012. “B.V.5.1 Das Protevangelium des Jakobus.” In C. Markschies and J. Schröter, eds., Antike christliche Apokryphen in deutscher Übersetzung, 1.1–2 (Evangelien und Verwandtes): 903–29. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
40.
PeppardMichael. 2012. “Illuminating the Dura-Europos Baptistery: Comparanda for the Female Figures.”Journal of Early Christian Studies20: 543–74.
SchwartzE.1930. “Zum Decretum Gelasianum.”Zeitschrift für die neutestamentli-che Wissenschaft29: 161–68.
43.
ShoemakerStephen J.2010. “Apocrypha and Liturgy in the Fourth Century: The Case of the ‘Six Books’ Dormition Apocryphon.” In CharlesworthJ. H. and MacDonaldL. M., eds., Jewish and Christian Scriptures: The Function of “Canonical” and “Non-Canonical” Religious Texts, 153–63. New York/London: Continuum.
44.
SlyDorothy. 1990. Philo's Perception of Women. Brown Judaic Studies 209. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
45.
TerianAbraham. 2008. The Armenian Gospel of the Infancy: With Three Early Versions of the Protevangelium of James.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
VoicuSever J.2011. “Ways to Survival for the Infancy Apocrypha.” In C. Clivaz et al., eds., Infancy Gospels: Stories and Identities, 401–17. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 281. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
47.
von DobschützErnst. 1912. Das Decretum Gelasianum de libris recipiendis et non recipiendis. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur 38:4. Leipzig: Hinrichs.
48.
VuongLily C.2013. Gender and Purity in the Protevangelium of James. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2:358. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
49.
WarnerMartin Clive. 2003. “Virginity Matters: Power and Ambiguity in the Attraction of the Virgin Mary.” PhD dissertation, University of Durham.
50.
WüstenfeldFerdinand. 1861. Geschichte der Stadt Mekka: Nach den arabischen Chroniken bearbeitet.Leipzig: Brockhaus.