BarrJ.1989a. The Literal, the Allegorical, and Modern Biblical Scholarship. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament44.
2.
BarrJ.1989b. Literality. Faith and Philosophy6.
3.
BauerW.1971. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity.Philadelphia: Fortress.
4.
BlocherH.1987. “The Analogy of Faith” in the Study of Scripture. Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology5: 17–38.
5.
BlowersP. M.1997. The “Regula Fidei” and the Narrative Character of Early Christian Faith. Pro Ecclesia6: 199–228.
6.
ChildsB. S.1977. The Literal Sense of Scripture: An Ancient and Modern Problem. In Beiträge zur Alttestamentlichen Theologie: Festschrift für Walther Zimmerli, 90–93.
7.
CohenC.1986–1907. Elements of Peshat in Traditional Jewish Bible Exegesis. Immanuel: 1–36.
8.
CountrymanW.1982. Tertullian and the Regula Fidei. Second Century2: 208–27.
9.
CoxeA. C.1884. The Apostolic Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325.Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
10.
CoxeA. C.1885a. Fathers of the Third Century. The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
11.
CoxeA. C.1885b. Latin Christianity: Its Founder, Tertullian. The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 325. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
12.
DonneJ.1975. Devotions upon Emergent Occasions. A. Raspa, 99–103. Montreal and London: McGill-Queens University Press.
13.
Flesseman-Van LeerE.1953. Tradition and Scripture in the Early Church.Assen: Van Gorcum.
14.
FreiH. W.1974. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative: A Study in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Hermeneutics.New Haven: Yale University Press.
15.
FreiH. W.1975. The Identity of Jesus Christ: The Hermeneutical Bases of Dogmatic Theology.Philadelphia: Fortress.
16.
FreiH. W.1986. The ‘Literal Reading’ of Biblical Narrative in the Christian Tradition: Does It Stretch or Will It Break. In Theology and Narrative: Selected Essays, ed. HunsingerGeorge, and PlacherWilliamNew York: Oxford University Press, 1993 (pp. 117–152).
17.
FreiHans W.1993. Conflicts in Interpretation: Resolution, Armistice, or Co-existence? In Theology and Narrative: Selected Essays, G. a. W. C. P. Hunsinger, 153–66. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
FroehlichK.1977. “Always to Keep the Literal Sense in Holy Scripture Means to Kill One's Soul”: The State of Biblical Hermeneutics at the Beginning of the Fifteenth Century. In Literary Uses of Typology, E. Miner, 28ff. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
GellesB.1981. Peshat and Derash in the Exegesis of Rashi.Leiden: Brill.
20.
GrantR. M.1951. The Place of the Old Testament in Early Christianity. Interpretation5: 186–202.
21.
GreenG.2000. Theology, Hermeneutics, and Imagination: The Crisis of Interpretation at the End of Modernity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Greene-McCreightK.1999. Ad Litteram: How Augustine, Calvin and Barth Read the “Plain Sense” of Genesis 1–3. Issues in Systematic Theology.New York: Peter Lang.
23.
GreensladeS. L., trans. 1956. Early Latin Theology: Selections from Tertullian, Cyprian, Ambrose and Jerome.Philadelphia: Westminster.
24.
HägglundB.1958. Die Bedeutung der “regula fidei” als Grundlage theologisher Aussagen. Studia Theologica12: 1–44.
25.
HalivniD. W.1991. Peshat and Derash: Plain and Applied Meaning in Rabbinic Exegesis.New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
HarringtonD. J.1980. The Reception of Walter Bauer's Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity during the Last Decade. Harvard Theological Review73: 289–98.
27.
HayD. M. ed. 1991. Both Literal and Allegorical: Studies in Philo of Alexandria's Questions and Answers on Genesis and Exodus. Brown Judaica Studies.Atlanta: Scholars Press.
28.
HoffmanD. L.1995. The Status of Women and Gnosticism in Irenaeus and Tertullian.Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
29.
KaminS.1980. Rashi's Exegetical Categorization with Respect to the Book of Genesis and Selected Passages from His Commentaries to Other Books of the Bible. Immanuel11: 16–32.
30.
KingJ., trans. 1847. Commentaries on the First Book of Moses Called Genesis, by John Calvin.Grand Rapids: Baker.
31.
LakeK.1912. The Apostolic Fathers. Loeb Classical Library.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
LashN.1986. Performing the Scriptures. In Theology on the Way to Emmaus, 37–46. London: SCM Press.
33.
LockshinM.1989. Tradition or Context: Two Exegetes Struggle with Peshat. In From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism, ed. FrerichsE., NeusnerJ., 173–86. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
34.
LoeweR.1964. The “Plain” Meaning of Scripture in Early Jewish Exegesis. In Papers of the Institute of Jewish Studies, London, WeissJ. G.Jerusalem: Magnes Press.
35.
LouvelF.1963. Appendix 3. In Les Ecrits de Pères Apostoliques, 491–92. Paris: Editions du Cerf.
36.
LuxonT. H.1995. Literal Figures: Puritan Allegory and the Reformation Crisis in Representation.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
MaoriY.1984. The Approach of Classical Jewish Exegetes to Peshat and Derash and Its Implications for the Teaching of Bible Today. Trans. Moshe Bernstein. Tradition21: 40–53.
38.
MarshallB.1990. Absorbing the World: Christianity and the Universe of Truths. In Theology and Dialogue: Essays in Conversation with George Lindbeck, MarshallB.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
39.
McCartneyD. G.1986. Literal and Allegorical Interpretation in Origen's Contra Celsum.Westminster Theological Journal48: 281–301.
40.
MitrosJ. F.1965. The Norm of Faith in the Patristic Age. Theological Studies29: 444–71.
41.
NobleP. R.1993. The Sensus Literalis: Jowett, Childs and Barr. Journal of Theological Studies44: 1–23.
42.
OsbornE. F.1989. Reason and the Rule of Faith in the Second Century AD. In The Making of Orthodoxy: Essays in Honor of Henry Chadwick, WilliamsR., 40–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PelikanJ.1971. The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition. The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
PelikanJ.Credo: historical and theological guide to creeds and confessions of faith in the Christian tradition.New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2003.
45.
RobinsonT. A.1988. The Bauer Thesis Examined: The Geography of Heresy in the Early Christian Church. In The Bauer Thesis Examined: The Geography of Heresy in the Early Christian Church.Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
46.
RogersE. F.1996. How the Virtues of the Interpreter Presuppose and Perfect Hermeneutics: The Case of Thomas Aquinas. Pro Ecclesia76.
47.
SandersJ. A.1987. First Testament and Second. Biblical Theology Bulletin1987(17): 47–49.
48.
SeitzC.1996. Old Testament or Hebrew Bible: Some Theological Considerations. Pro Ecclesia5: 292–303.
49.
SimonU.1988. The Religious Significance of the Peshat.Tradition23: 41–63.
50.
StroupG. W.2004. Before God.Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
51.
TannerK.1987. Theology and the Plain Sense. In Scriptural Theology and Narrative Interpretation, G. Green, 60.Philadelphia: Fortress.
52.
TurnerH. E. W.1954. The Pattern of Christian Truth: A Study in the Relations between Orthodoxy and Heresy in the Early Church.London: A. R. Mowbray.
53.
WilliamsR.1991. The Literal Sense of Scripture. Modern Theology7: 121–34.
54.
WoodC.1981. The Formation of Christian Understanding: An Essay in Theological Hermeneutics.Philadelphia: Westminster.
55.
YeagoD. S.1994. The New Testament and Nicene Dogma: A Contribution to the Recovery of Theological Exegesis. Pro Ecclesia3.
56.
ZachmanR.2007. Image and Word in the Theology of John Calvin.Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.