Strength-based assessment has achieved acceptance from educational, mental health, and social service professionals as a means to measuring emotional and behavioral strengths of children. Several standardized, norm-referenced tests have been developed to assess these strengths; however, the primary mode of assessment is via informal interviews of parents and caregivers. In many cases, these interviews lack psychometric support, including basic validity and reliability. The purpose of this study was to document the multistep process used to establish the content validity of a newly developed instrument: Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Strength-Based Interview. Specifically, the results of a survey of 40 U.S. professional mental health staff and educators are described where respondents rated the importance of interview questions to the construct of strength-based assessment. The findings of the survey as well as the 18 items deemed most important are reported. Research limitations, future research, and implications for mental health and educational professionals are discussed.
BrodM.TeslerL. E.ChristensenT. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
6.
ChatzinikolaouR. (2015). How can strength-based interventions be useful for educational psychologists working with children and young people?Educational Psychology Research and Practice, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.15123/uel.8856x
7.
ClimieE.HenleyL. (2016). A renewed focus on strengths-based assessment in schools. British Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12131
8.
CoxK. F. (2006). Investigating the impact of strength-based assessment on youth with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 15, 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9021-5
9.
EpsteinM. H. (2004). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment (2nd ed.). PRO-ED.
10.
EpsteinM. H.PierceC. D.LambertM. C. (2022). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment (3rd ed.). PRO-ED.
11.
EpsteinM. H.SharmaJ. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. PRO-ED.
12.
FurlongM. J.YouS.RenshawT. L.SmithD. C.O’MalleyM. D. (2014). Preliminary development and validation of the social and emotional health survey for secondary students. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 1011–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0373-0
HartS. N.HartB. N. (2014). Children’s rights and school psychology: Historical perspective and implications for the profession. School Psychology International, 35(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313508875
15.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1(4), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/014544557714001
LeffertN.BensonP. L.ScalesP. C.SharmaA. R.DrakeD. R.BlythD. A. (1998). Developmental assets: Measurement and prediction of risk behaviors among adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2(4), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0204_4
18.
MantheyT. J.KnowlesB.AsherD.WahabS. (2011). Strengths-based practice and motivational interviewing. Advances in Social Work, 12(2), 126–151. https://doi.org/10.18060/959
19.
MertensD. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. SAGE.
20.
NickersonA. B.FishmanC. E. (2013). Promoting mental health and resilience through strength-based assessment in US schools. Educational and Child Psychology, 30(4), 7–17.
21.
PullaV. R. (2017). Strengths-based approach in social work: A distinct ethical advantage. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 3(2), 97–114.
22.
RawanaE.BrownleeK. (2009). Making the possible probable: A strength-based assessment and intervention framework for clinical work with parents, children, and adolescents. Families in Society, 90(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.3900
23.
SaleebeyD. (Ed.). (2009). The strengths perspective in social work practice (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
24.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ.WitmerS. (2016). Assessment in special and inclusive education (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
25.
TedeschiR. G.KilmerR. P. (2005). Assessing strengths, resilience, and growth to guide clinical interventions. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 36(3), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.36.3.230
26.
TsangK. L. V.WongP. Y. H.LoS. K. (2011). Assessing psychosocial well-being of adolescents: A systematic review of measuring instruments. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(5), 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01355.x
27.
UngarM.LiebenbergL. (2011). Assessing resilience across cultures using mixed methods: Construction of the child and youth resilience measure. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811400607
VandenBergJ. E.GrealishE. M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234675
30.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. http://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
