In this article, we examined predictive validity of Student Risk Screening Scale—Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE) scores for use with elementary-age students (N = 4,465) from 14 elementary schools. Results indicated elementary school students with high levels of risk according to fall SRSS-IE scores—especially those with externalizing behaviors—were more likely to have lower oral reading fluency scores, lower Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) reading scores, more nurse visits, and more days spent in in-school suspension compared with students at low risk for externalizing or internalizing behaviors. Educational implications, limitations, and future directions are presented.
AAP Council on School Health. (2016). Role of the school nurse in providing school health services. Pediatrics, 137(6), e20160852. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-0852
BradshawC. P.BuckleyJ. A.IalongoN. S. (2008). School-based service utilization among urban children with early onset educational and mental health problems: The squeaky wheel phenomenon. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 169–186. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.169
4.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.CrnoboriM. E.BruhnA. L.OakesW. P. (2011). Self-determination interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Mapping the knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 100–116.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CookB. G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 233–246. doi:10.1177/0741932514528995
7.
CookB. G.TankersleyM. (Eds.). (2013). Effective practices in special education. Boston, MA: Pearson.
8.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
9.
ElliottS. N.GreshamF. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System (SSiS)—Performance screening guide. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp Pearson Education.
10.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F. N.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 4–18. doi:10.1177/1063426611401624
12.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345. doi:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
13.
GreenJ. G.ComerJ. S.DonaldsonA. R.ElkinsR. M.NadeauM. S.ReidG.PincusD. B. (2017). School functioning and use of school-based accommodations by treatment-seeking anxious children. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 25, 220-232. doi:10.1177/1063426616664328
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et esq. (2004).
15.
JohnsonV.HutchersonV. (2006). A study of the utilization patterns of an elementary school-based health clinic over a 5-year period. Journal of School Health, 76, 373–378. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00128.x
16.
KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2015). Behavior Assessment System for Children-Third edition (BASC-3): Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
LaneK. L.CarterE.JenkinsA.MagillL.GermerK. (2015). Supporting comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered models of prevention in schools: Administrators perspectives. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 209–222. doi:10.1177/1098300715578916
19.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.LambertW.CrnoboriM.BruhnA. (2010). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: A replication. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 100–112. doi:10.1177/1063426609341069
20.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.MenziesH. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
LaneK. L.LittleM. A.CaseyA. M.LambertW.WehbyJ. H.WeisenbachJ. L.PhillipsA. (2009). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: How do they compare?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 93–105. doi:10.1177/1063426608326203
22.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M. (2009). Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE). Retrieved from http://www.ci3t.org/screening
23.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.KalbergJ. R. (2012). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.LambertW.CoxM. L.HankinsK. (2012). A validation of the Student Risk Screening Scale for internalizing and externalizing behaviors: Patterns in rural and urban elementary schools. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 244–270.
25.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.CantwellE. D.RoyerD. J. (2016). Building and installing comprehensive, integrated, three-tiered (Ci3T) models of prevention: A practical guide to supporting school success. Phoenix, AZ: KOI Education.
26.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.CantwellE. D.RoyerD. J.LekoM.SchatschneiderC.MenziesH. M. (2018). Predictive validity of Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE) scores in secondary schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1063426617744746
27.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.CommonE. A.ZorigianK.BrunstingN. C.SchatschneiderC. (2015). A comparison between SRSS-IE and SSiS-PSG scores: Examining convergent validity. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40, 114–126. doi:10.1177/1534508414560346
28.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.EnnisR. P.CoxM. L.SchatschneiderC.LambertW. (2013). Additional evidence for the reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale at the high school level: A replication and extension. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21, 97–115. doi:10.1177/1063426611407339
29.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J. (2015). Additional evidence of convergent validity between SRSS-IE and SSiS-PSG scores. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 213–229. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-40.4.213
30.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.HarrisP. J.MenziesH. M.CoxM. L.LambertW. (2012). Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale for internalizing and externalizing behaviors at the elementary level. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 99–122.
31.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.SwoggerE. D.SchatschneiderC.MenziesH. M.SanchezJ. (2015). Student Risk Screening Scale for internalizing and externalizing behaviors: Preliminary cut scores to support data-informed decision making. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 159–170. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-40.3.159
32.
LaneK. L.Richards-TutorC.OakesW. P.ConnorK. (2014). Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale with elementary age English learners. Assessment and Effective Intervention, 39, 219–232. doi:10.1177/1534508413496836
33.
LaneK. L.WalkerH. M. (2015). The connection between assessment and intervention: How can screening lead to better interventions? In BatemanB.TankersleyM.LloydJ. (Eds.), Enduring issues in special education: Personal perspectives (pp. 283–301). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
MagginD. M.WehbyJ. H.FarmerT. W.BrooksD. S. (2016). Intensive interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Issues, theory, and future directions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 24, 127–137. doi:10.1177/1063426616661498
35.
McIntoshK.CampbellA. L.CarterD. R.ZumboB. D. (2009). Concurrent validity of office discipline referrals and cut points used in schoolwide positive behavior supports. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 100–113.
36.
McIntoshK.GoodmanS. (2016). Integrating multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
MenziesH. M.LaneK. L. (2012). Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: Evidence of predictive validity in a diverse, suburban elementary setting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 82–91. doi:10.1177/1063426610389613
38.
MenziesH. M.LaneK. L.OakesW. P.EnnisR. P. (2017). Increasing students’ opportunities to respond: A strategy for supporting engagement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 204–209. doi:10.1177/1053451216659467
OakesW. P.LaneK. L.CoxM.MessengerM. (2014). Logistics of behavior screenings: How and why do we conduct behavior screenings at our school?Preventing School Failure, 58, 159–170. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.895572
42.
OakesW. P.WilderK.LaneK. L.PowersL.YokoyamaL.O’HareM. E.JenkinsA. B. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Student Risk Screening Scale: An effective tool for use in diverse urban elementary schools. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 231–239. doi:10.1177/1534508410379796
43.
RapportM. D.DenneyC. B.ChungK. M.HustaceK. (2001). Internalizing behavior problems and scholastic achievement in children: Cognitive and behavioral pathways as mediators of outcome. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 30, 536–551. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3004_10
44.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK.EnnisR. P. (2018). A systematic review of teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise on K-12 student performance. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi: 0741932517751054
45.
SmithS. W.TaylorG. G.BarnesT.DaunicA. P. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral interventions to prevent aggression of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. In CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT. J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 25. Classroom behavior, contexts, and interventions (pp. 47–70). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
46.
TraversJ. C.CookB. G.TherrienW. J.CoyneM. D. (2016). Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 195–204. doi:10.1177/0741932516648462
47.
US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2017). Request for applications: Research networks focused on critical problems of policy and practice in special education: Multi-tiered systems of support (CFDA No. 84.324N).
48.
VernbergE. M.NelsonT. D.FonagyP.TwemlowS. W. (2011). Victimization, aggression, and visits to the school nurse for somatic complaints, illnesses, and physical injuries. Pediatrics, 127, 842–848. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3415
49.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H.FeilE. G. (2014). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD) technical manual: Universal screening for preK–9 (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Pacific Northwest Publishing.
50.
YudinM. (2014). PBIS: Providing opportunity. A keynote address presented at the National PBIS Leadership Forum. Rosemont, IL: Reform.
