Comparing a Framework for Conceptualizing Parental Involvement in Education Between Students at Risk of Emotional and Behavioral Issues and Students Without Disabilities

Abstract

Youth at risk of emotional and behavioral challenges demonstrate academic difficulties in secondary settings. Parental involvement in their child’s education is one method which contributes to improved academic outcomes. However, limited research exists on the use of measurement models to operationalize parental involvement with secondary students at risk for emotional and behavioral issues. The goal of this study was to examine the measurement properties of an existing three-domain conceptualization of parental involvement including school-based involvement, home-based involvement, and academic socialization, and a six-domain conceptualization to (a) determine whether these models are replicable with a population of secondary students at risk for emotional and behavioral issues, (b) examine the measurement invariance of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models between samples of ninth graders in public and private schools without disabilities and ninth graders at risk of emotional and behavioral issues, and (c) determine whether parental involvement differs due to at-risk status. The six-factor model fit the data closest for both groups and was invariant between groups, suggesting this framework is appropriate for a variety of student groups. There were significantly lower levels of parental involvement in four of the six domains for the ninth-grade students at risk in comparison with students in the general population without disabilities.

Keywords

at-risk adolscents parental involvement pyschometrics emotional and behavioral disorders

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

Duchnowski

A. J.

Kutash

(2011). School reform and mental health services for students with emotional disturbances educated in urban schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 323–346.

Duppong Hurley

Lambert

January

S. A.

Huscroft D’Angelo

. (2017). Confirmatory factor analyses comparing parental involvement frameworks with secondary students. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 947-964. doi:10.1002/pits.22039

Epstein

J. L.

(1987). Toward a theory of family-school connections: Teacher practices and parent involvement. In Hurrelmann

Kaufmann

F.-X.

Lösel

Hurrelmann

Kaufmann

F.-X.

Lösel

(Eds.), Social intervention: Potential and constraints (pp. 121-136). Oxford, UK: Walter De Gruyter.

Fan

Chen

(2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. doi:10.1023/A:1009048817385

Froiland

J. M.

Peterson

Davison

M. L.

(2013). The long-term effects of early parent involvement and parent expectation in the USA. School Psychology International, 34, 33–50.

Grolnick

W. S.

Slowiaczek

M. L.

(1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00747.x

Hill

N. E.

Tyson

D. F.

(2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740–763. doi:10.1037/a0015362

10.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

11.

Jeynes

(2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40, 237–269.

12.

Jeynes

(2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42, 82–110.

13.

Shen

Krenn

Yuan

(2016). A meta-analysis of the relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during early childhood education and early elementary education. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 771-801. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9351-1

14.

Millsap

R. E.

(2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.

15.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2014). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

16.

Newman

(2004). Family involvement in the educational development of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

17.

Newman

(2005). NLTS2 data brief: Family expectations and involvement for youth with disabilities. National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. Available from www.ncset.org

18.

Powell

D. R.

Son

S. H.

File

Froiland

J. M.

(2012). Changes in parent involvement across the transition from public school prekindergarten to first grade and children’s academic outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 276–300.

19.

Punter

R. A.

Glas

C. A. N.

Meelissen

M. R. M.

(2016). Psychometric framework for modeling parental involvement and reading literacy. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28064-6

20.

Wagner

Friend

Bursuck

W. D.

Kutash

Duchnowski

A. J.

Sumi

W. C.

Epstein

M. H.

(2006). Educating students with emotional disturbances: A national perspective on school programs and services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 12–30.

21.

(2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.