The objective of the study was to examine the link between therapeutic alliance and youth outcomes. The study was conducted at a group home with 112 youth with a disruptive-behavior diagnosis. Therapeutic alliance was collected routinely via youth and staff report. Outcome data were collected using youth and staff reports of externalizing behavior as well as behavioral incidents occurring during care. Outcome data were collected following intake into services and at 6 and 12 months of care. Data were analyzed to examine (a) whether youth behavior problems at intake were predictive of therapeutic alliance and (b) whether changes in alliance were predictive of subsequent youth outcomes. These were conducted with a 6-month service-delivery model and replicated with a 12-month model. There was some support for the first hypothesis, that initial levels of youth externalizing behavior would be related to alliance ratings; however, most of the effects were marginally significant. The second hypothesis, that changes in therapeutic alliance would be related to subsequent youth outcomes, was supported for the 6-month model, but not the 12-month model. Changes in therapeutic alliance may be predictive of youth outcomes during care. Additional research into examining therapeutic alliance trajectories is warranted to improve mental health services for youth.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
2.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont.
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
4.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
5.
BickmanL.AthayM. M.RiemerM.LambertE. W.KelleyS. D.BredaC.. . . AndradeA. R. (Eds.). (2010). Manual of the Peabody Treatment Progress Battery (2nd ed.) [Electronic version]. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
6.
BickmanL.VidesdeAndradeA. R.AthayM. M.ChenJ. I.De NadaiA. S.Jordan-ArthurB. L.KarverM. S. (2012). The relationship between change in therapeutic alliance ratings and improvement in youth symptom severity: Whose ratings matter the most?Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 39, 78–89. doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0398-0
7.
BickmanL.VidesdeAndradeA. R.LambertE. W.DoucetteA.SapytaJ.BoydA. S.. . . RauktisM. B. (2004). Youth therapeutic alliance in intensive treatment settings. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 31, 134–148.
8.
BordinE. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16, 252–260. doi:10.1037/h0085885
9.
DavisJ.DalyD. L. (2003). Long-Term Residential Program training manual (4th ed.). Boys Town, NE: Father Flanagan’s Boy’s Home.
10.
Duppong HurleyK.IngramS.CzyzJ. D.JulianoN.WilsonE. (2006). Treatment for youth in short-term care facilities: The impact of a comprehensive behavior management intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, 617–632.
11.
Duppong HurleyK.LambertM. C.StevensA. (2014). Psychometrics of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale for high-risk youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1063426614535809
12.
Duppong HurleyK.LambertM. C.Van RyzinM.SullivanJ.StevensA. (2013). Therapeutic alliance between youth and staff in residential group care: Psychometrics of the Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.10.009
13.
EltzM. J.ShirkS. R.SarlinN. (1995). Alliance formation and treatment outcome among maltreated adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19, 419–431.
14.
FlorsheimP.ShotorbaniS.Guest-WarnickG.BarrattT.HwangW. C. (2000). Role of the working alliance in the treatment of delinquent boys in community-based programs. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 94–107. doi:10.1207/S15374424jccp2901_10
15.
FrimanP. C.HandwerkM. L.SmithG. L.LarzelereR. E.LucasC. P.ShafferD. M. (2000). External validity of conduct and oppositional defiant disorders determined by the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 277–286.
16.
GarlandA. F.BickmanL.ChorpitaB. F. (2010). Change what? Identifying quality improvement targets by investigating usual mental health care [Special issue]. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37, 15–26. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0279-y
17.
GlissonC. (2002). The organizational context of children’s mental health services. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 233–253.
18.
GlissonC.GreenP. (2011). Organizational climate, services and outcomes in child welfare systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 582–591.
19.
GoodmanR. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–799. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00494
20.
GreenJ. (2006). Annotation: The therapeutic alliance—A significant but neglected variable in child mental health treatment studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 425–435. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01516.x
21.
HawleyK. M.GarlandA. F. (2008). Working alliance in adolescent outpatient therapy: Youth, parent and therapist reports and associations with therapy outcomes. Child and Youth Care Forum, 37, 59–74. doi:10.1007/s10566-008-9050-x
22.
HorvathA. O.BediR. P. (2002). The alliance. In NorcrossJ. C. (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 37–69). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
HorvathA. O.SymondsB. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analyses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149. doi:10.1037//0022-0167.38.2.139
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
26.
JewellJ.HandwerkM.AlmquistJ.LucasC. (2004). Comparing the validity of clinician-generated diagnosis of conduct disorder to the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 536–546. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3303_11
27.
KarverM. S.HandelsmanJ. B.FieldsS.BickmanL. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 50–65. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.09.001
28.
KazdinA. E.MarcianoP. L.WhitleyM. K. (2005). The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral treatment of children referred for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 726–730. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.726
29.
LarzelereR. E.SmithG. L.BatenhorstL. M.KellyD. B. (1996). Predictive validity of the Suicide Probability Scale among adolescents in group home treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 166–172.
30.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
31.
MansoA.RauktisM. E.BoydA. S. (2008). Youth expectations about therapeutic alliance in a residential setting. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 25, 55–72.
32.
MartinD.GraskeJ.DavisM. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438
33.
McLeodB. D. (2011). Relation of the alliance with outcomes in youth psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 603–616. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.001
34.
MosesT. (2000). Attachment theory and residential treatment: A study of staff-client relationships. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 474–490. doi:10.1037/h0087681
35.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
36.
RauktisM. E.VidesdeAndradeA. R.DoucetteA.McDonoughL.ReinhartS. (2005). Treatment foster care and relationships: Understanding the role of therapeutic alliance between youth and treatment parent. International Journal of Child & Family Welfare, 8, 146–163.
37.
ShafferD.FisherP.LucasC.DulcanM.Schwab-StoneM. (2000). NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): Description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 28–38. doi:10.1097/00004583-200001000-00014
38.
SharfJ.PrimaveraL. H.DienerM. J. (2010). Dropout and therapeutic alliance: A meta-analysis of adult individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 47, 637–645. doi:10.1037/a0021175
39.
ShirkS. R.KarverM. (2003). Prediction of treatment outcome from relationship variables in child and adolescent therapy: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 452–464. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.3.452
40.
ShirkS. R.KarverM. S.BrownR. (2011). The alliance in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 17–24. doi:10.1037/a0022181
41.
WolfM. M.PhillipsE.FixsenD.BaukmannC. J.KiriginK. A.WillnerA. G.SchumakerJ. (1976). Achievement place: The teaching-family model. Child Care Quarterly, 5, 92–103.
42.
ZegersM. A. M.SchuengelC.van IJzendoornM. H.JanssensJ. M. A. M. (2006). Attachment representations of institutionalized adolescents and their professional caregivers: Predicting the development of therapeutic relationships. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 325–334. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.325
