The purpose of this study was to determine the benefits of a multiple family group (MFG) service delivery model compared with services as usual (SAU) in improving the functioning of youth with oppositional defiant/conduct disorder in families residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Participants included 320 youth aged 7 to 11 and their families who were referred to participating outpatient clinics. Participants were assigned to the MFG or the SAU condition, with parent report of child oppositional behavior, social competence, and level of youth impairment as primary outcomes at post-treatment. Family engagement to MFG was measured by attendance to each group session. Caregivers of youth in the MFG service delivery model condition reported significant improvement in youth oppositional behavior and social competence compared with youth in the SAU condition. Impairment improved over time for both groups with no difference between treatment conditions. The MFG led to greater percentage of youth with clinically significant improvements in oppositional behavior. Attendance to the MFG was high, given the high-risk nature of the study population. The MFG service delivery model offers an efficient and engaging format to implement evidence-based approaches to improving functioning of youth with oppositional defiant and/or conduct disorder in families from socioeconomically disadvantaged communities.
AlexanderJ.PughC.ParsonsB.SextonT. (2000). Functional family Therapy. In ElliottD. S. (Ed.), Blueprints for violence prevention Vol. 8, Functional family therapy (pp. 185–205). Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AngoldE.CostelloE. J.ErkanliA. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 57–87.
4.
AxbergU.BrobergA. G. (2012). Evaluation of ‘‘The Incredible Years’’ in Sweden: The transferability of an American parent training program to Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 224–232.
5.
BehanJ.FitzpatrickC.SharryJ.CarrA.WaldronB. (2004). Evaluation of the parenting plus program. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 22, 238–256.
6.
CaninoG.AlegriaM. (2008). Psychiatric diagnosis-is it universal or relative to culture?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 237–250. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01854.x
7.
ChackoA.WymbsB. T.ArnoldF. W.PelhamW. E.Swanger-GagneM.GirioE. L.. . .O’ConnorB. (2009). Enhancing traditional behavioral parent training for single mothers of children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38, 206–218.
8.
ChorpitaB. F.DaleidenE. L. (2009). Mapping evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Application of the distillation and matching model to 615 treatments from 322 randomized trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 566–579.
9.
CostinJ.ChambersS. M. (2007). Parent management training as a treatment for children with oppositional defiant disorder referred to a mental health clinic. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 511–524. doi:10.1177/1359104507080979
10.
EybergS.NelsonM.BoggsS. (2008). Evidence-based psychological treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 215–237.
11.
FabianoG. A.PelhamW. E.WaschbuschD.Gnangy.E.LaheyB.ChronisA.. . .Burrows-MacLeanL. (2006). A practical measure of impairment: Psychometric properties of the impairment rating scale in samples of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and two school-based samples. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35, 369–385. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3503_3
12.
GallartS.MattheyS. (2005). The effectiveness of Group Triple P, and the impact of the four telephone contacts. Behaviour Change, 22, 71–80.
13.
GardnerF.BurtonJ.KlimesI. (2006). Randomized controlled trial of a parenting intervention in the voluntary sector for reducing child conduct problems: Outcomes and mechanisms of change. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 1123–1132.
14.
GarlandA. F.HawleyK. M.Brookman-FrazeeL. I.HurlburtM. (2008). Identifying common elements of evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children’s disruptive behavior problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 505–514.
15.
GoodwinP. J.LeszczM.EnnisM.KoopmansJ.VincentL.GutherH.HunterJ. (2001). The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1719–1726.
16.
GopalanG.GoldsteinL.KlingensteinK.SicherC.McKayM. (2010). Engaging vulnerable youth and their families. Journal of Canadian Child Psychiatry, 19, 182–196.
17.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
HoagwoodK.BurnsB.WeiszJ. (2002). A profitable conjunction: From science to service in children’s mental health. In BurnsB.HoagwoodK. (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidenced-based interventions for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 327–338). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
20.
HoagwoodK. E.CavaleriM. A.OlinS.BurnsB.SlatonE.GruttadaroD.HughesR. (2010). Family support in children’s mental health: A review and synthesis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 1–45.
21.
HutchingsJ.BywaterT.DaleyD.GardnerF.WhitakerC.JonesK.. . .EdwardsR. T. (2007). Parenting intervention in Sure Start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 334, 678. doi:10.1136/bmj.39126.620799.55
22.
IngoldsbyE. M. (2010). Review of interventions to improve family engagement and retention in parent and child mental health programs. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 629–645. doi:10.1007/s10826-009-9350-2
23.
KeileyM. K. (2002). Attachment and affect regulation: A framework for family treatment of conduct disorder. Family Process, 41, 477–492.
24.
KleveL.CrimliskS.ShoebridgeP.GreenwoodR.BakerB.MeadB. (2011). Is the Incredible Years programme effective for children with neuro-developmental disorders and for families with social services involvement in the “real-world” of community CAMHS?Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 253–264. doi:10.1177/1359104510366280
25.
KlingA.ForsterM.SundellK.MelinL. (2010). A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behavior Therapy, 41, 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004
26.
LauA. S.FungJ.HoL.LiuL.GudinoO. (2011). PMT with high-risk immigrant Chinese families: A pilot group randomized trial yielding practice-based evidence. Behavior Therapy, 42, 413–426.
27.
LeeC. M.HorvathC.HunsleyJ. (2013). Does it work in the real world? The effectiveness of treatments for psychological problems in children and adolescents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44, 81–88. doi:10.1037/a0031133
28.
McKayM.BannonW. (2004). Engaging families in child mental health services. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 905–921.
29.
McKayM.GonzalesJ.QuintanaE.KimL.Abdul-AdilJ. (1999). Multiple family groups: An alternative for reducing disruptive behavioral difficulties of urban children. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 593–607.
30.
McKayM.GonzalesJ.StoneS.RylandD.KohnerK. (1996). Multiple family therapy groups. Social Work With Groups, 18, 41–56. doi:10.1300/J009v18n04_04
31.
McKayM.HarrisonM.GonzalezL.QuintanaE. (2002). Multiple-family groups for urban children with conduct difficulties and their families. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1467–1468.
32.
MichelsonD.DavenportC.DretzkeJ.BarlowJ.DayC. (2013). Do evidence-based interventions work when tested in the “real world”? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parent management training for the treatment of child disruptive behavior. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16, 18–34. doi:10.1007/s10567-013-0128-0
33.
OgdenT.HagenK. A. (2008). Treatment effectiveness of parent management training in Norway: A randomized controlled trial of children with conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 607–621. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.76.4.607
34.
PelhamW. E.GnagyE. M.GreensladeK. E.MilichR. (1992). Teacher ratings of DSM-III-R symptoms for the disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 210–218.
35.
PhillipsJ.MorganS.CawthroneK.BarnettB. (2008). Pilot evaluation of parent–child interaction therapy delivered in an Australian community early childhood clinic setting. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42, 712–719. doi:10.1080/00048670802206320
36.
StoneS.McKayM.StoopsC. (1996). Evaluating multiple family groups to address the behavioral difficulties of urban children. Small Group Research, 27, 398–415.
37.
U.S. Public Health Service. (2000). Report of the Surgeon General’s Conference on Children’s Mental Health: A national action agenda. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
38.
WaschbuschD. A.WilloughbyM. T. (2008). Parent and teacher ratings on the IOWA Conners Rating Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30, 180–192.
39.
WeiszJ. R.ChorpitaB. F.PalinkasL. A.SchoenwaldS. K.MirandaJ.BearmanS. K., … Research Network on Youth Mental Health. (2012). Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: A randomized effectiveness trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 274–282. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147
40.
WeiszJ. R.Jensen-DossA.HawleyK. M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. American Psychologist, 61, 671–689. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.671
41.
WeiszJ. R.UguetoA. M.CheronD. M.HerrenJ. (2013). Evidence-based youth psychotherapy in the mental health ecosystem. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42, 274–286. doi:10.1080/15374416.2013.764824
