In this article we examine the psychometric properties of the Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS) for use in diverse, urban elementary schools. Results of two studies suggest strong internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Both studies also suggest strong convergent validity with other psychometrically sound, systematic screeners including the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Study 1) and the Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (Study 2). In addition, both studies suggest initial SRSS scores predict (a) suspension rates for students in kindergarten through fourth grades and (b) performance on state achievement tests for third grade students. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
AchenbachT. M. (1991). Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3.
BullisM.WalkerH. M. (1994). Comprehensive school-based systems for troubled youth. Eugene: University of Oregon, Center on Human Development.
4.
BuneviciusA.PeceliunieneJ.MickuvieneN.ValiusL.BuneviciusR. (2007). Screening for depression and anxiety disorders in primary care patients. Depression and Anxiety, 24, 455–460.
5.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, National Academies Press.
6.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
7.
DrummondT.EddyJ. M.ReidJ. B. (1998a). Follow-up study #3; Risk Screening Scale: Prediction of negative outcomes by 10th grade from 2nd grade screening (Unpublished tech. rep.). Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.
8.
DrummondT.EddyJ. M.ReidJ. B. (1998b). Follow-up study #4; Risk Screening Scale: Prediction of negative outcomes in two longitudinal samples (Unpublished tech. rep.). Eugene: Oregon Social Learning Center.
9.
DrummondT.EddyJ. M.ReidJ. B.BankL. (1994, November). The Student Risk Screening Scale: A brief teacher screening instrument for conduct disorder. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Prevention Conference, Washington, DC.
10.
ElliottS. N.GreshamF. M. (2007). Social Skills Improvement System: Classwide intervention program guide. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
11.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
12.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586.
13.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345.
14.
GoodmanR.ScottS. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17–24.
15.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467−519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (1990). The Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17.
GreshamF. M.LaneK. L.LambrosK. M. (2000). Comorbidity of conduct problems and ADHD: Identification of “fledgling psychopaths.”Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 83–93.
18.
GreshamF. M.LopezM. F. (1996). Social validation: A unifying construct for school-based consultation research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 204–227.
19.
HanleyJ. A.McNeilB. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36.
20.
HatcherL.StepanskiE. J. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
HosmerD. W.LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2007). BASC-2 Behavior and Emotional Screening System (BASC-2 BESS). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
24.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2009). Politics, civil rights, and disproportional identification of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 17, 177–188.
25.
KraemerH. C. (1992). Evaluating medical tests: Objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
LaneK. L. (2007). Identifying and supporting students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders within multi-level models: Data driven approaches to conducting secondary interventions with an academic emphasis. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 135–164.
27.
LaneK. L.BruhnA. L.EisnerS. L.KalbergJ. R. (2010). Score reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: A psychometrically sound, feasible tool for use in urban middle schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 211–224.
28.
LaneK. L.EisnerS. L.KretzerJ. M.BruhnA. L.CrnoboriM. E.FunkeL. M.. . . CaseyA. M. (2009). Outcomes of functional assessment-based interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders in a job-share setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 573–604.
29.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.BruhnA. L.MahoneyM. E.DriscollS. A. (2008). Primary prevention programs at the elementary level: Issues of treatment integrity, systematic screening, and reinforcement. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 465–494.
30.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.LambertE. W.CrnoboriM.BruhnA. L. (2010). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 100–112.
31.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.ParksR. J.CarterE. W. (2008). Student Risk Screening Scale: Initial evidence for score reliability and validity at the high school level. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 178–190.
32.
LaneK. L.KalbergJ. R.MenziesH. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A - step-by-step approach. New York; Guilford Press.
33.
LaneK. L.LittleM. A.CaseyA. M.LambertW.WehbyJ. H.WeisenbachJ. L.PhillipsA. (2009). A comparison of systematic screening tools for emotional and behavioral disorders: How do they compare?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 93–105.
34.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M. (2003). A school-wide intervention with primary and secondary levels of support for elementary students: Outcomes and considerations. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 431–451.
35.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. (2005). Teacher-identified students with and without academic and behavioral concerns: Characteristics and responsiveness to a school-wide intervention. Behavior Disorders, 31, 65–83.
36.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. MOakesW. P.KalbergJ. R. (in press). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. New York: Guilford.
37.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2010). Systematic screenings to prevent the development of learning and behavior problems: Considerations for practitioners, researchers, and policy makers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21, 160–172.
38.
LaneK. L.ParksR. J.KalbergJ. R.CarterE. W. (2007). Systematic screening at the middle school level: Score reliability and validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15, 209–222.
39.
LaneK. L.WehbyJ. (2002). Addressing antisocial behavior in the schools: A call for action. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6, 4–9.
40.
LanyonR. (2006). Mental health screening: Utility of the psychological screening inventory. Psychological Services, 3, 170–180.
41.
LewisT. J.SugaiG. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–24.
42.
LoeberR. (1991). Antisocial behavior: More enduring than changeable?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 30, 393–397.
43.
LoeberR.LeBlancM. (1990). Towards a developmental criminology. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 12, pp. 375–473). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
MenziesH. M.LaneK. L. (2010). Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: Evidence of predictive validity in a diverse, suburban elementary setting. Manuscript submitted for publication.
45.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill.
46.
OakesW. P.WilderK.LaneK. L.PowersL.YokoyamaL.O’HareM. E.JenkinsA. B. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Student Risk Screening Scale: An effective tool for use in diverse urban elementary schools. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 231–239.
47.
Pearson Education. (2008). AIMSweb. San Antonio, TX: Author.
48.
PetrasH.ChilcoatH.LeafP. J.IalongoN. S.KellamS. G. (2004). Utility of TOCA-R scores during the elementary school years in identifying later violence among adolescent males. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 88–96.
49.
Positive Action. (2008). Positive Action: Positive development for schools, families and communities. Twin Falls, ID: Author.
50.
RutterM. (1967). A children’s behavior questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 1–11.
51.
SeversonH.WalkerH. (2002). Proactive approaches for identifying children at risk for sociobehavioral outcomes. In LaneK. L.GreshamF. M.O’ShaughnessyT. E. (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 33–53). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior supports in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 130–135.
53.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–260.
54.
SugaiG.HornerR.GreshamS. (2002). Behaviorally effective school environments. In ShinnM. R.WalkerH. M.StonerG. (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 315−350). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
55.
Tennessee Department of Education. (2007). State of Tennessee annual statistical report of the Department of Education. Nashville: Author.
56.
Tennessee Department of Education. (2008). State of Tennessee annual statistical report of the Department of Education. Nashville: Author.
57.
Tennessee Department of Education. (2009). State of Tennessee annual statistical report of the Department of Education. Nashville: Author.
58.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
59.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. (1992). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders: User’s guide and technical manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
60.
WalkerH.SeversonH. (2002). Developmental prevention of at-risk outcomes for vulnerable antisocial children and youth. In LaneK. L.GreshamF. M.O’ShaughnessyT. E. (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 177–194). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
61.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH. H.FeilE. G. (1995). Early Screening Project: A proven child find process: Technical manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
