Individuals who engage in problem behavior should be taught an appropriate behavior that meets the same function and replaces the problem behavior. Often, there are several appropriate replacement behaviors, and guidance is needed to choose among them. This study employs a hybrid single subject design with a baseline, alternating treatments, and final treatment phase to compare the effects of four replacement behavior conditions (none, teacher help, break, or choice between help and break) on the off-task behavior of three boys with a history of escaping from task demands. Although all replacement behaviors were associated with less off-task behavior than none, the choice condition was associated with the least off-task behavior and its implementation was staggered during the final treatment phase.
BloodE.NeelR. S. (2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 67–80.
2.
CarrE.DurandV. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
3.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2006). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
CroneD. A.HawkenL. S.BergstromM. K. (2007). A demonstration of training, implementing, and using functional behavioral assessment in 10 elementary and middle school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 15–29.
5.
CroneD. A.HornerR. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
6.
DalyE. J.GarbaczS. A.OlsonS. C.PersampieriM.NiH. (2006). Improving oral reading fluency by influencing students’ choice of instructional procedures: An experimental analysis with two students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Interventions, 21, 13–30.
7.
DunlapG.dePerczelM.ClarkeS.WilsonD.WrightS.WhiteR.GomezA. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505–518.
8.
DurandV. M.MergesE. (2001). Functional communication training: A contemporary behavior analytic intervention for problem behaviors. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 110–119.
9.
DyerK.DunlapG.WinterlingV. (1990). Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 515–524.
10.
EllingsonS. A.MiltenbergerR. G.StrickerJ.GalenskyT. L.GarlinghouseM. (2000). Functional assessment and intervention for challenging behaviors in the classroom by general classroom teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 85–97.
11.
FisherW. W.MazurJ. E. (1997). Basic and applied research on choice responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 387–410.
12.
HornerR. H.DayH. M. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719–732.
13.
HornerR. H.SpragueJ. R.O’BrienM.HeathfieldL. T. (1990). The role of response efficiency in the reduction of problem behaviors through functional equivalence training: A case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 91–97.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 USC 1400 et sec.
15.
IngramK.Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG. (2005). Function-based intervention planning: Comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 224–236.
16.
KampsD.WendlandM.CulpepperM. (2006). Active teacher participation in functional behavior assessment for students with emotional and behavioral disorder risks in general education classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 128–146.
17.
LermanD. C.IwataB. A.RainvilleB.AdelinisJ. D.CroslandK.KoganJ. (1997). Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 411–422.
18.
MarquisJ. G.HornerR. H.CarrE. G.TurnbullA.ThompsonM.BehrensG. A.Magito-McLaughlinD.McAteeM. L.SmithC. E.RyanK. A.DoolabhA. (2000). A meta-analysis of positive behavior support. In GerstenR. M.SchillerE. P.VaughnS. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 137-178.
19.
MeyerK. A. (1999). Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior exhibited by elementary school children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 229–232.
20.
O’NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.StoreyK.SpragueJ. R. (1997). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
21.
SugaiG.HornerR. H.DunlapG.HienemanM.LewisT. J.NelsonC. M.. . . RuefM. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 131–143.
22.
TaylorJ.MillerM. (1997). When timeout works some of the time: The importance of treatment integrity and functional assessment. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 4–22.
23.
VaughnB. J.HornerR. H. (1997). Identifying instructional tasks that occasion problem behaviors and assessing the effects of student versus teacher choice among these tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 299–312.
24.
Waldron-SolerK. M.MartellaR. C.Marchand-MartellaN. E.EbeyT. L. (2000). Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 93–96.
25.
WilcoxB. L.TurnbullR.TurnbullA. P. (2000). Behavioral issues and IDEA: Positive behavioral interventions and supports and the functional behavioral assessment in the disciplinary context. Exceptionality, 8, 173–187.
26.
Wright-GalloG. L.HigbeeT. S.ReagonK. A.DaveyB. J. (2006). Classroom-based functional analysis and intervention for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 29, 421–436.
