An alternating treatments design was used to investigate the effects of three types of opportunities to respond (i.e., individual, choral, and mixed responding) on sight words and syllable practice in six elementary students with behavioral problems. During the mixed responding condition, five out of six students demonstrated a lower rate of disruptive behavior, and four out of six students had fewer intervals of off-task behavior. Results of the three types of opportunities to respond on participants’ active student responding were less clear. A discussion of limitations, implications, and future research directions is included.
Anderson, L.M., Evertson, C.M., & Brophy, J.E. ( 1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first grade reading groups. The Elementary School Journal, 79, 193-223.
2.
Armendariz, F., & Umbreit, J. ( 1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152-158.
3.
Barbetta, P.M., & Heward, W.L. ( 1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of geography facts by elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education , 3, 217-233.
4.
Barlow, D.H., & Hayes, S.C. ( 1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
5.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. ( 1989). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
6.
Carnine, D.W. ( 1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199-206.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Academy for effective instruction: Working with mildly handicapped students . Reston, VA: Author.
9.
Davis, C.A., & Fox, J. ( 1999). Evaluating environmental arrangement as setting events: Review and implications for measurement. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 77-96.
10.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. ( 1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466-476.
11.
Godfrey, S.A., Grisham-Brown, J., Schuster, J.W., & Hemmeter, M.L. (2003). The effects of three techniques on student participation with preschool children with attending problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 255-272.
12.
Good, T.L. ( 1970). Which pupils do teachers call on? The Elementary School Journal, 70, 190-198.
13.
Greenwood, C.R. ( 2001). Science and students with learning and behavioral problems . Behavioral Disorders, 27, 37-52.
14.
Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R.V. ( 1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic achievement . In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH : Merrill.
15.
Gunter, P.L., Reffel, J.M., Barnett, C.A., Lee, J.M., & Patrick, J. ( 2004). Academic response rates in elementary-school classrooms . Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 105-113.
16.
Gunter, P.L., Shores, R.E., Jack, S.L., Denny, R.K., & DePaepe, P.A. ( 1994). A case study of the effects of altering instructional interactions on the disruptive behavior of a child identified with severe behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 435-444.
17.
Gunter, P.L., Venn, M.L., Patrick, J., Miller, K.A., & Kelly. L. ( 2003). Efficacy of using momentary time samples to determine on-task behavior of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 400-412.
18.
Hastings, R.P., & Oakford, S. ( 2003). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special needs. Educational Psychology, 23, 87-94.
19.
Haydon, T., Mancil, G.R., & VanLoan, C. (in press). The effects of opportunities to respond on the on-task behavior for a student emitting disruptive behaviors in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children.
20.
Heward, W.L. ( 1994). Three "low tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner, III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, & T. E. Heron (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21.
Heward, W.L., Courson, F.H., & Narayan, J.S. ( 1989). Using choral responding to increase active student response . Teaching Exceptional Children, 21, 72-75.
22.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery M. ( 2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-180.
23.
Kazdin, A.E. ( 1982). Single case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koegel, R.L., Dunlap, G., & Dyer, K. ( 1980). Intertrial interval duration and learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 91-99.
26.
McKenzie, G.R., & Henry, M. ( 1979). Effects of testlike events on on-task behavior, test anxiety, and achievement in a classroom rule-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 370-374.
27.
Miller, A.D., Hall, M.A., & Heward, W.L. ( 1995). Effects of sequential 1-minute time trials with and without inter-trial feedback and self-correction on general and special education students’ fluency with math facts. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 319-345.
28.
Nelson, J.R., & Roberts, M.L. ( 2002). Ongoing reciprocal teacher-student interactions involving disruptive behaviors in general education classrooms. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 8, 27-39.
29.
Noell, G.H., & Witt, J.C. ( 1998). Toward a behavior analytic approach to consultation. In T. S. Watson & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 41-57). New York: Plenum.
30.
Sainato, D.M., Strain, P.S., & Lyon, S.R. ( 1987). Increasing academic responding of handicapped preschool children during group instruction. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 23-30.
31.
Schwartz, I.S., & Baer, D.M. ( 1991). Social-validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189-204.
32.
Scott, T.M., & Kamps, D.M. ( 2007). The future of functional behavior assessment in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 146-157.
33.
Sindelar, P.T., Bursuck, W.D., & Halle, J.W. ( 1986). The effects of two variations of teacher questioning on student performance. Education and Treatment of Children , 9, 56-66.
34.
Skinner, C.H., Belfiore, P.J., Mace, H.W., William-Wilson, S., & Johns, G.A. ( 1997). Altering response topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54-64.
35.
Skinner, C.H., Fletcher, P.A., & Henington, C. ( 1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student responses rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly , 11, 313-325.
36.
Skinner, C.H., Johnson, C.W., Larkin, J., Lessley, D.J., & Glowacki, M.L. (1995). The influence of rate of presentation during taped-words interventions on reading performance. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 3, 214-224.
37.
Skinner, C.H., & Shapiro, E.S. ( 1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123-133.
38.
Skinner, C.H., Smith, E.S., & McLean, J.E. (1994). The effects of intertrial interval duration on sight-word learning rates in children with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 19, 98-107.
39.
Sterling, R.M., Barbetta, P.M., Heward, W.L., & Heron, T.E. ( 1997). A comparison of active student response and on-task instruction on the acquisition and maintenance of health facts by fourth grade special education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 151-165.
40.
Stevens, R., & Rosenshine, B. (1981). Advances in research on teaching. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 1-9.
41.
Sutherland, K.S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P.L. ( 2003). The effect of increased rates of opportunities to respond on the classroom behavior of students with emotional/behavioral disorders . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239-248.
42.
Trolinder, D.M., Choi, H., & Proctor, T.B. ( 2004). Use of delayed praise as a directive and its effectiveness on on-task behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology , 20, 61-83.
West, R.P., & Sloane, H.N. ( 1986). Teacher presentation rate and point delivery rate: Effects on classroom disruption, performance accuracy, and response rate. Behavior Modification, 10, 267-286.
45.
Witt, J.C., VanDerHyeden, A.M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions: A systematic process for finding and eliminating problems. School Psychology Review, 33, 363-383.
46.
Wolery, M., Ault, M.J., Doyle, P.M., Gast, D.L., & Griffin, A.M. ( 1992). Choral and individual responding: Identification of interactional effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 289-309.
47.
Yarbrough, J.L., Skinner, C.H., Lee, Y.J., & Lemmons, C. ( 2004). Decreasing transition times in a second grade classroom: Scientific support for the timely transitions game. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20, 85-107.
