In this study, the authors examined the facility-to-community transition experiences—focusing specifically on employment—of 531 incarcerated youth following their release from Oregon's juvenile correctional system. They gathered data on the sample while these youth were still in custody and then every 6 months through phone interviews to describe the participants' community work, educational, and living and social experiences of the study participants.The authors documented the participants' return to the juvenile correctional system and entry into the adult correctional system from extant state databases. In this study, being employed at 6 months postexit was related in a marginally statistically significant manner ( p = .07) to remaining in the community and out of the correctional system at that same point in time. Generally,young men, participants without special education disabilities, those youth committed to the juvenile correctional system for person-related crimes, and individuals who were not gang members exhibited better employment outcomes. Services provided by mental health agencies and other social service agencies were inversely related to employment rate, but substance abuse treatment and completion of career/vocational classes while in custody were positively related to selected employment outcomes. The results suggest that individualized job placement and support services should be offered to members of this population upon their parole to the community—with special attention paid to distinct subgroups, such as young women, juvenile offenders with special education disabilities, gang members, and those with a history of property crimes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bukstein, O., & Van Hasslet, V. (1995). Substance abuse disorders . In V. Van Hasslet & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychopathology (pp. 384—406). New York: Lexington Books.
4.
Bullis, M., & Cheney, D. (1999). Vocational and transition interventions for adolescents and young adults with emotional or behavioral disorders. Focus onExceptional Children, 31(7), 1—24.
5.
Bullis, M., & Fredericks, H. D. (Eds.). (2002). Providing effective vocational/transition services to adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. Champaign-Urbana, IL: Research Press.
6.
Bullis, M., Moran, T., Todis, B., Benz, M., & Johnson, M. (2002). Description and evaluation of the ARIES project: Achieving rehabilitation, individualized education, and employment success for adolescents with emotional disturbance. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 41—58.
7.
Bullis, M., Nishioka-Evans, V., Fredericks, H.D., & Davis, C. (1993). Identifying and assessing the job-related social skills of adolescents and young adults with emotional and behavioral disorders . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 236—250.
8.
Bullis, M., & Yovanoff, P. (1997). Return to close custody: Analysis of the Oregon Youth Authority's data set. Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior.
9.
Bullis, M., Yovanoff, P., & Havel, E. (2004). The importance of getting started right: Further examination of the community engagement of formerly incarcerated youth. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 80—94.
10.
Bullis, M., Yovanoff, P., Havel, M.E., & Mueller, G. (2001). Transition research on adjudicated adolescents in community settings: Final report on the TRACS project. Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute on Violence and Destructive Behavior.
11.
Bullis, M., Yovanoff, P., Mueller, G., & Havel, E. (2002). Life on the “outs”—Examination of the facility-to-community transition of incarcerated adolescents. Exceptional Children, 69, 7—22.
12.
Cheney, D. (Ed.). (2004). Transition of secondary students with emotional or behavioral disabilities. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional children, Division on Behavioral Disorders and Division for Career Development and Transition.
13.
Cheney, D., & Bullis, M. (2004). Research issues in the transition of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. In R. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn, & S. Mathur (Eds.), Handbook of research in behavioral disorders (pp. 369—384). New York : Guilford Press.
14.
Clark, H. B., & Davis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Transition of youth and young adults with emotional/behavioral disturbances into adulthood: Handbook for practitioners, parents, and policy makers. Baltimore : Brookes.
15.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Crites, J. (1989). Career development in adolescence: Theory, measurement, and longitudinal findings. In D. Stern & D. Eichorn (Eds.), Adolescence and work: Influences of social structure, labor markets, and culture (pp. 141—158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
DeStefano, L., & Wagner, M. (1992). Outcome assessment in special education: What lessons have we learned? In F. Rusch, L. DeStefano, J. Chadsey-Rusch , L. Phelps, & E. Szymanski (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life (pp. 173—207). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
19.
Dryfoos, J. (1990). Adolescents at risk. New York : Oxford University Press.
20.
Dryfoos, J. (1991). Adolescents at risk: A summation of works in the field-programs and policies. The Journal of AdolescentHealth , 12, 630—637.
21.
Ensminger, M., & Juon, H. (1998). Transition to adulthood among high-risk youth . In R. Jessor (Ed.), New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior (pp. 365—391). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Foley, R. (2001). Academic characteristics of incarcerated youth and correctional education programs: A literature review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 248—259.
23.
Fulton, S., & Sabornie, E. (1994). Evidence of employment inequality among females with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 149—165.
24.
Gallagher, C.A. (1999, March). Juvenile offenders in residential placement, 1997 (OJJDP Fact Sheet). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Delinquency Prevention.
25.
Halpern, A. (1993). Quality of life as a conceptual framework for evaluating transition outcomes. Exceptional Children, 59, 486—498.
26.
Hollingshead, A. (1975). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University, Department of Sociology .
27.
Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
28.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. 34 CFR Parts 300, 301 and 303. Proposed Rules, 62 Fed. Reg. 55026.
29.
Kazdin, A. (1987). Treatment of antisocial behavior in children: Current status and future directions. Psychological Bulletin,102, 187— 203.
30.
Kazdin, A. (1993). Adolescent mental health: Prevention and treatment programs. The American Psychologist, 48, 127—141.
31.
Levine, P., & Edgar, E. (1994). An analysis of respondent agreement in follow-up studies of graduates of special and regular education programs. Exceptional Children, 60, 334—343.
32.
Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders (pp. 313—345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Loeber, R., & Schmaling, K. (1985). The utility of differentiating between mixed and pure forms of antisocial child behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 315—335.
34.
Menhard, S. (1990). Longitudinal research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. O'Gorman, T., & Woolson, R. (1991). Variable selection to discriminate between two groups: Stepwise logistic regression or stepwise discriminant analysis. The American Statistician, 45, 265—268.
35.
Rudas, T. (1998). Odds ratios in the analysis of contingency tables (Sage University papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Thompson, B. (1999). Improving research clarity and usefulness with effect size indices as supplements to statistical significance tests. Exceptional Children, 65, 329—338.
37.
Unruh, D., Bullis, M., Booth, C., & Pendergrass, J. (2004). Project SUPPORT: A description and evaluation of the implementation of a transition project for formerly incarcerated adolescents with special education and mental health disorders . In D. Cheney (Ed.), Transition of secondary students with emotional or behavioral disabilities (pp. 226—246). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional children, Division on Behavioral Disorders and Division for Career Development and Transition.
38.
Wagner, M. (1991). The benefits associated with secondary vocational education for young people with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
39.
Weber, J. (1987). Strengthening vocational education's role in decreasing the dropout rate. Columbus: Ohio State University, Center for Research in Vocational Education.
40.
Werner, E., & Smith, R. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High-risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
41.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. The American Psychologist, 54, 594—604.
42.
Will, M. (1984). OSERS program for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation .
43.
Wolford, B. (2000). Youth education in the juvenile justice system . Corrections Today, 62, 128—130.
