In this article, the authors describe the development, psychometric characteristics, and potential utility of the Wraparound Fidelity Index (WFI), a multi-informant measure designed to assess providers' adherence during service delivery to the essential elements of wraparound. Results from 408 families across 16 sites in nine states indicated adequate psychometrics for use of the WFI as an overall fidelity measure. The psychometrics for individual element scores were less reliable, however. The authors discuss the implications for research and practice, identifying specific items to be revised and potential uses for the WFI. They also cover policy implications, including how to overcome challenges observed in implementing the wraparound approach nationally.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bond, G.R., Evans, L., Salyers, M., Williams, J., & Hea-Won, K. (2000). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research , 2, 75—87.
2.
Bruns, E.J., Burchard, J.D., Suter, J.C., & Force, M. (in press).Measuring fidelity within community treatments for children and families: Challenges and strategies. In M. Epstein, A. Duchnowski , & K. Kutash (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families. Austin, TX: PRO-ED .
3.
Bruns, E.J., Ermold, J., & Burchard, J.D. (2001). The Wraparound Fidelity Index: Results from an initial pilot test. In C. Newman, C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), The 13th annual research conference proceedings: A system of care for children's mental health. Tampa: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health.
4.
Bruns, E.J., Suter, J.C., Burchard, J.D., & Leverentz-Brady, K. (2003, March). A national portrait of wraparound: Results from the Wraparound Fidelity Index. Paper presented at the 16th annual System of Care Conference: Building the Research Base, Tampa, FL.
5.
Bruns, E.J., Suter, J., Force, M., Burchard, J.D., & Dakan, E. (2003). Fidelity to the wraparound process and its association with outcomes. In C. Newman, C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. M. Friedman (Eds.), The 15th annual research conference proceedings: A system of care for children's mental health. Tampa: University of South Florida, Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health.
6.
Burchard, J.D., Bruns, E.J., & Burchard, S.N. (2002). The wraparound approach . In B. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based treatment for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 69—90). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
Burchard, J.D., Burchard, S.N., Sewell, R., & VanDenBerg, J. (1993). One kid at a time: Evaluative case studies and descriptions of the Alaska Youth Initiative Demonstration Project. Washington, DC: SAMHSA Center for Mental Health Services.
8.
Burns, B.J. (2002). Reasons for hope for children and families: A perspective and overview. In B. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based treatment for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 3—15). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
9.
Burns, B. J., & Goldman, S. K. (Eds.). (1999). Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families . In Systems ofcare: Promising practices in children's mental health (1998 series, Vol. 4). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice.
10.
Burns, B.J., Hoagwood, K., & Maultsby, L.T. (1998). Improving outcomes for children and adolescents with serious emotional and behavioral disorders: Current and future directions. In M. Epstein , K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families (pp. 685—708). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
11.
Chamberlain, P. (2002). Treatment foster care. In B. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based treatment for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 117—138). Oxford , England: Oxford University Press.
12.
Cronbach, I.J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
13.
DeVellis, R.F. (1987). Scale development: Theory and applications. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Duchnowski, A.J., Kutash, K., & Friedman, R.M. (2002). Community-based interventions in a system of care and outcomes framework. In B. Burns & K. Hoagwood (Eds.), Community treatment for youth: Evidence-based treatment for severe emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 16— 38). Oxford , England: Oxford University Press.
15.
Eber, L. (2003). The art and science of wraparound. Bloomington: Indiana University, Forum on Education .
16.
Epstein, M., Jayanthi, M., McKelvey, J., Frankenberry, E., Hary, R., Potter, K., et al. (1998). Reliability of the Wraparound Observation Form: An instrument to measure the wraparound process. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7, 161—170.
17.
Epstein, M.H., Nordness, P.D., Duchnowski, A., Kutash, K., Schrepf, S., & Benner, G. (2003). Assessing the wraparound process during family planning meetings. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 30, 352—362.
18.
Faw , L. (1999). The state wraparound survey. In B. J. Burns & S. K. Goldman (Eds.), Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families: Systems of care— Promising practices in children's mental health (1998 series, Vol. 4, pp. 61—66). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice .
19.
Grealish, M. (2000). The wraparound process curriculum. McMurray, PA: Community Partners.
20.
Hagan, M., Noble, K., Schick, C., & Nolan, M. (2003, March). The relationship between fidelity to wraparound and positive behavioral outcomes. Paper presented at the 16th annual System of Care Conference: Building the Research Base, Tampa, FL.
21.
Henggeler, S.W., Schoenwald, S.K., Borduin, C.M., Rowland, M.D., & Cunningham, P.B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.
22.
Hoagwood, K., Schoenwald, S., Kiser, L., Ringeisen, H., & Burns, B. (2001). Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1179—1189.
23.
Kendziora, K., Bruns, E., Osher, D., Pacchiano, D., & Mejia, B. (Eds.). (2001). Wraparound: Stories from the field. In Systems of care: Promising practices in children's mental health (2001 series, Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice.
24.
Rast, J., & VanDenBerg, J. (2003, March). Certification of facilitators as a method for increasing wraparound fidelity. Paper presented at the 16th annual System of Care Conference: Building the Research Base, Tampa, FL.
25.
Stroul, B. (2002). Systems of care—A framework for system reform in children's mental health (Issue brief). Washington, DC: National Technical Assistance Center for Children's Mental Health.
26.
Suter, J., Burchard, J.D., Force, M., Bruns, E.J., & Mehrtens, K. (2002). User's manual to the Wraparound Fidelity Index 3.0. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychology.
27.
VanDenBerg, J.E., & Grealish, M.E. (1998). The wraparound process training manual. Pittsburgh, PA: The Community Partnerships Group.
28.
Walker, J.S., Koroloff, N., & Schutte, K. (2003). Implementing high-quality collaborative individualized service/support planning: Necessary conditions. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children's Mental Health.
