Child strengths have been recognized as an important variable in clinical decision making. In the present study, data were gathered on 270 children to determine how psychiatric symptoms, functioning, risk behaviors, and child strengths contributed to decisions about placement and intensity of services. Symptoms, functioning, and risk were found to be significantly related to child strengths, and children in home-like settings were found to possess significantly higher levels of strengths than children in nonhomelike settings. A series of logistic regression models demonstrated that child strengths were significantly associated with child placement, even after accounting for the effects of age, race, and level of risk.The data reveal an orderly relationship between child strengths and placement at varied levels of symptoms and risk.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T.M., & Edelbrock, C.S. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2000). 2000 Kids count data book: State profiles of child well-being. Baltimore: Author.
4.
Bricker-Jenkins, M. (1992). Building a strengths model of practice in the public social services. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 122-136). New York: Longman.
5.
Bums, B. J., & Goldman, B. (Eds.). (1999). Promising practices in wraparound for children with serious emotional disturbance and their families. (Vol. IV). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes of Research .
6.
Cohen, R., Wiley, S., Oswald, D.P., Eakin, K.B., & Best, A.M. (1999). Applying utilization management principles to a comprehensive service system for children with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: A feasibility study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 463-476.
7.
Conners, C.K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J.D., & Epstein, N.J. (1998). The Revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 553-567.
8.
DeChillo, N., Koren, P.E., & Mezera, M. (1996). Families and professionals in partnership. In B. A. Stroul (Ed.), Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society (pp. 389-407). Baltimore: Brookes.
9.
Duchnowski, A.J., Hall, K.S., Kutash, D., & Friedman, R.M. (1998). The alternatives to residential treatment study. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families (pp. 55-80). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
10.
Dunst, C.J., & Trivette, C.M. (1988). Toward experimental evaluation of the Family, Infant and Preschool Program. In H. B. Weiss & F. H. Jacobs (Eds.) Evaluating family programs: Modern applications of social work (pp. 315-346). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter .
11.
Epstein, M.H. (1999). The development and validation of a scale to assess the emotional and behavioral strengths of children and adolescents. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 258-262.
12.
Epstein, M.H., Harniss, M.K., Pearson, N., & Ryser, G. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Test-retest and interrater reliability. Journal of Child and Family Studies , 8, 319-327.
13.
Epstein, M.H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14.
Friedman, K.A., Leone, P.E., & Friedman, P. (1999). Strengths-based assessment of children with SED: Consistency of reporting by teachers and parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 169-180.
15.
General Assembly of Virginia.Comprehensive Services Act for At-Risk Youth and Families. Code of Virginia, chap. 46, § 2.1-745-2.1-759(1992).
16.
Greenbaum, P.E., Dedrick, R.F., Friedman, R.M., Kutash, K., Brown, E.C., Lardieri, S.P., & Pugh, A.M. (1996). National Adolescent and Child Treatment Study (NACTS): Outcomes for children with serious emotional and behavioral disturbance . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 130-146.
17.
Gresham, F.M., & Elliott, S.N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18.
Harniss, M.K., Epstein, M.H., Ryser, G., & Pearson, N. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Convergent validity. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 4-14.
19.
Hodges, K. (1996). CAFAS Manual for Training Coordinators, Clinical Administrators, and Data Managers. Ypsilanti, MI: Eastern Michigan University, Department of Psychology .
20.
Lyons, J.S. (1998). The severity and acuity of psychiatric illness-Child and adolescent (Manual). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
21.
Lyons, J.S., Howard, K.I., O'Mahoney, M.T., & Lish, J.D. (1997). The measurement and management of clinical outcomes in mental health. New York: Wiley .
22.
Petr, C.G. (1998). Social work with children and their families. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Poertner, J., & Ronnau, J. (1992). A strengths approach to children with emotional disabilities. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman.
24.
Rapp, C.A. (1998). The strengths model: Case management with people suffering from severe and persistent mental illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Reich, W., & Welner, Z. (1988). Revised version of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA-R). St. Louis, MO: Washington UniversitySchool of Medicine , Department of Psychiatry.
26.
Ring-Kurtz, S.E., Sonnichsen, S., & Hoover-Dempsey, K.V. (1995). School-based mental health services for children. In L. Bickman & D. Rog (Eds.), Children's mental health services: Research, policy, and evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 117-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Ronnau, J., & Poertner, J. (1993). Identification and use of strengths: A family system approach. Children Today, 22, 20-23.
28.
Saleebey, D. (1992). The strengths perspective in social work practice . New York: Longman.
29.
Scwhab-Stone, M., Fisher, P., Piacentini, J., Shaffer, D., Davies, M., & Briggs, M. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised version (DISC-R): II. Test-retest reliability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 658-665.
30.
Shaffer, D., Schwab-Stone, M., Fisher, P., Piacentini, J., Davies, M., Conners, C.K., & Regier, D. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised version (DISC-R): I. Preparation field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 643-650.
31.
Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales: Interview ed. (survey Form Manual). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
32.
Stroul, B.A., & Friedman, R.M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances (Revised ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.
33.
Tavitian, M.L., Lubiner, J.L., Green, L., Grebstein, L.C., & Velicer, W.F. (1987). Dimensions of family functioning. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 191-204.
34.
Trivette, C.M., Dunst, C.J., Deal, A.G., Hamer, A.W. (1990). Assessing family strengths and family functioning style. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 10(1),16-35.
35.
U. S. Department of Education. (1994). National Agenda for Achieving Better Results for Children and Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance. Washington, DC: Author.
36.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
37.
VanDenBerg, J.E., & Grealish, E.M. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 7-22.
