This paper examines and evaluates success factors to develop strategies for implementing concurrent engineering (CE) in Hong Kong electronics and plastic products industries. The success factors, benefits, and costs of CE implementation are considered, and a model based on the AHP methodology is formulated to assess their relative priorities. The results from the electronics and plastic products industries are compared. The data from both industries are pooled and the relative importance of success factors for the combined indus tries is determined. The same model is also used to determine the benefit/cost ratios and to decide whether or not to implement CE in these selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries.
R.R. Gehani , Concurrent Product Development for Fast-Track Corporations, Long Range Planning, Vol. 25, pp. 40-47, 1992.
2.
B. Uttal, Speeding ideas to market, Fortune, pp. 62-66, March 2, 1987.
3.
R.T. Winner, J.P. Pennell, H.E. Bertrand and M.M.G. Slusarczuk , The Role of Concurrent Engineering in Weapons System Acquisition, IDA Report R-338, Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis, 1988.
4.
C O'Neal, Concurrent Engineering with Early Supplier Involvement : A Cross-Functional Challenge, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, pp. 3-9, 1993.
5.
V.M. Rao Tummala , K.S. Chin and S.H. Ho , Evaluation of Success Factors for CE Implementation Using AHP: A Case Study in Hong Kong Electronics Industry, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 49, pp. 265-283, 1997.
6.
V.M. Rao Tummala , K.S. Chin and S.H. Ho , Assessing the Success Factors for Implementing CE Using AHP: A Case Study in Hong Kong Plastic Products Industry, Advances in Concurrent Engineering, A Proceedings of the Third Conference on Concurrent Engineering, Research and Applications , Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp. 395-402, August 1996.
7.
S.W. Lui, Exploiting Competitive Advantage for Hong Kong Plastics Industry, Speech at 1994 Hong Kong Advanced Plastics Manufacturing Technologies Conference, Hong Kong Plastics Technologies Centre, Hong Kong, 1994.
8.
Hong Kong Government Industry Department, Report on Techno-Economic and Market Research Study on Hong Kong's Electronics Industry 1993-1994, January 1995.
9.
S. Evans, F. Lettice and P. Smart, Concurrent Engineering—Key Implementation Issues, Advances in Agile Manufacturing, edited by Kidd P. T. & Karwowski W., Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 89-92, 1994.
10.
R.G. Boznak and A.K. Decker, Competitive Product Development : A Quality Approach to Succeeding in the 90s and Beyond, Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin, 1993.
11.
K.B. Clark and T. Fujimoto, Product Development Performance—Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry, Boston, MA: Publishing Division, Harvard Business School, 1991.
12.
D.E. Carter, Concurrent Engineering The Product Development Environment for the 1990s, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992 .
13.
D.I. Cleland , Product Design Teams: The Simultaneous Engineering Perspective, Project Management Journal, pp. 5-10, December 1991.
14.
L. Trygg, Concurrent Engineering Practices in Selected Swedish Companies, Journal of Product Innovation and Management, Vol. 10, pp. 403-415, 1993.
A.K. Gupta and D.L. Wilemon, Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products, California Management Review, pp. 24-44, Winter 1990.
17.
T.L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytical Hierarchy Process, Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications , 1994.
18.
V.M. Rao Tummala and Y.W. Wan, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Practice: A Survey of Applications and Recent Developments, Mathematical Modelling and Scientific Computing, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-38, 1994.
19.
Expert Choice, McLean, VA: Decision Support Software, Inc., 1986.
