Abstract
Current computer aided engineering tools support only a single specialized area of the design cycle and do not allow for com parisons of multiple designs. The DICE project at MIT (1987-1995) sought to address these limitations by developing tools that support a cooperative design cycle involving negotiation by various experts as the design evolves. CONGEN, a system developed under DICE, pro vides a blackboard-like context mechanism for negotiation and a knowledge base of design strategies. We propose a means of extending the knowledge base with a set of design evaluation knowledge sources to assist in comparing alternate designs and identifying the tradeoffs among them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
