Abstract
At the request of Sage and the Journal Editor, the following articles have been retracted:
Sreelatha K, Krishna Reddy V. Integrity and memory consumption aware electronic health record handling in cloud. Concurrent Engineering. 2021;29(3):258-265. doi:10.1177/1063293X211027869
Ilayarajaa KT, Logashanmugam E. Embedded mobile computational framework for multidimensional diabetic retinopathy extraction and detection technique using recursive neural network approach for unstructured tomography datasets. Concurrent Engineering. 2022;30(1):93-102. doi:10.1177/1063293X211071044
JC J, S L. Phased array ultrasonic test signal enhancement and classification using Empirical Wavelet Transform and Deep Convolution Neural Network. Concurrent Engineering. 2022;30(3):229-236. doi:10.1177/1063293X211073714
Dellagi S, Trabelsi W, Hajej Z, Rezg N. Integrated maintenance/spare parts management for manufacturing system according to variable production rate impacting the system degradation. Concurrent Engineering. 2020;28(1):72-84. doi:10.1177/1063293X19898734
Vijayakumar K, Kadam VJ, Sharma SK. Breast cancer diagnosis using multiple activation deep neural network. Concurrent Engineering. 2021;29(3):275-284. doi:10.1177/1063293X211025105
Jiao Y, Deng X, Li L, Liu X, Cao N. Modeling and solving the two-sided U-type assembly line balance based on a heuristic algorithm of a multi-priority rule. Concurrent Engineering. 2022;30(3):262-272. doi:10.1177/1063293X221104527
Chen Q, Chen L, Zeng X-T, Wei C-C. Compressing project to minimize the increased risk and cost. Concurrent Engineering. 2022;0(0). doi:10.1177/1063293X221133344
Jin G, Sperandio S, Girard P. Management of the design process: Human resource evaluation in factories of the future. Concurrent Engineering. 2018;26(4):313-327. doi:10.1177/1063293X18802888
Sánchez-DelaCruz E, Salazar López JP, Lara Alabazares D, Tello Leal E, Fuentes-Ramos M. Deep learning framework for leaf damage identification. Concurrent Engineering. 2021;29(1):25-34. doi:10.1177/1063293X21994953
After an internal investigation, Sage found that the peer-review process for these articles was compromised and contains indicators of third-party involvement.
As the peer-review process has not met Sage’s expectations of high quality and ethical peer-review, the publisher cannot uphold the integrity of the research. In line with COPE guidelines and Sage policies, these articles are retracted.
The authors have been informed of this decision using the email addresses provided at submission.