Arezzo-flexible manufacturing system: A generic flexible manufacturing system shop floor emulator approach for high-level control virtual commissioning

Abstract

The benchmark of several high-level control strategies is required during the design of flexible manufacturing systems. Virtual commissioning is a popular approach to test and validate the behavior of the target control system based on a virtual model. It can actually simulate and help study the behavior of electro-mechanical shop floor components, characterized by a physical layer and low-level control functions but it fails to simulate the behavior of high-level control functions, such as dynamic resource allocation and product routing. Thus, virtual commissioning of the flexible manufacturing system can be a complex task because it requires to model the low- and high-level control functions in different software environments and to connect them through a specific interface. Switching from “virtual” to “real” remains a challenging issue since it requires to connect the high-level control functions to the real system through the real interface. This article introduces and details the Arezzo-flexible manufacturing system approach for supporting the virtual commissioning of the flexible manufacturing system, including the distinct but consistent modeling of their low- and high-level control functions. The Arezzo-flexible manufacturing system approach consists in gradually defining an emulator of the shop floor to which several candidate high-level control strategies can connect through a standard interface layer. The interface layer to the virtual shop floor emulates the real interface layer to the real shop floor, so that switching from the virtual to the real environment is straightforward. In this article, both the emulator design method and the involved generic components needed are described in turn. A real flexible cell is used as a case study to demonstrate the Arezzo-flexible manufacturing system approach and some illustrations are provided to emphasize the similarity between the shop floor emulator obtained (Arezzo-APV) and the real shop floor (Aip-Primeca flexible manufacturing system cell).

Keywords

virtual commissioning high-level virtual commissioning flexible manufacturing systems manufacturing control component-based modeling emulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arezzo (2014) http://sourceforge.net/projects/arezzo/?source=navbar (accessed 13 October 2014).

Auinger

Vorderwinkler

Buchtela

(1999) Interface driven domain-independent modeling architecture for “soft-commissioning” and “reality in the loop.” In: Proceedings of the 31st conference on winter simulation: simulation—a bridge to the future, vol. 1, Phoenix, AZ, 5–8 December, pp. 798–805. New York: IEEE.

Azab

AlGeddawy

Seleim

(2012) Simulation methods for changeable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 3: 179–184.

Bench4star (B4S) (2014) Available at: http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/bench4star/ (accessed 7 October 2014).

Berger

Deneux

Bonte

. (2014) Arezzo: an emulator for the bench4star initiative. In: Proceedings of joint conference on mechanical, design engineering & advanced manufacturing, Toulouse, 18–20 June.

Brennan

(2002) Evaluating alternative manufacturing control strategies using a benchmark system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 216(6): 927–932.

Christensen

(2003) HMS/FB architecture and its implementation. In: Deen

(ed.) Agent-Based Manufacturing. Berlin: Springer, pp. 53–87.

Danielsson

Moore

Eriksson

(2003) Validation, off-line programming and optimisation of industrial control logic. Mechatronics 13(6): 571–585.

Emulica (2014) Available at: http://emulica.sourceforge.net/ (accessed 7 October 2014).

10.

Feliot

Cassar

Starowiecki

(1996) Towards a formal language of physical systems. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 4: 2768–2773.

11.

Hibino

Fukuda

(2008) Emulation in manufacturing engineering processes. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, 2008 (WSC’08), Austin, TX, 7–10 December, pp. 1785–1793. New York: IEEE.

12.

Hoffmann

Schumann

Maksoud

. (2010) Virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems a review and new approaches for simplification. In: ECMS, pp. 175–181. Available at: http://www.scs-europe.net/conf/ecms2010/2010%20accepted%20papers/ibs_ECMS2010_0041.pdf

13.

Jamod (2014) Java Modbus library (Online). Available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/jamod/ (accessed 7 October 2014).

14.

Lau

K-K

Wang

(2007) Software component models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 33(10): 709–724.

15.

Liu

Diedrich

Suchold

(2012) Virtual Commissioning of Automated Systems. INTECH Open Access Publisher. Available at: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/37992/InTech-Virtual_commissioning_of_automated_systems.pdf

16.

Mařík

Lažanský

(2007) Industrial applications of agent technologies. Control Engineering Practice 15(11): 1364–1380.

17.

NetLogo (2014) Available: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ (accessed 7 October 2014).

18.

Reinhart

Wünsch

(2007) Economic application of virtual commissioning to mechatronic production systems. Production Engineering 1(4): 371–379.

19.

Rockwell Automation (2014) Siman (Online). Available at: https://www.arenasimulation.com/ (accessed 7 October 2014).

20.

Sallez

Berger

Deneux

. (2010) The lifecycle of active and intelligent products: the augmentation concept. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 23(10): 905–924.

21.

Seidel

Donath

Haufe

(2012) Towards an integrated simulation and virtual commissioning environment for controls of material handling systems. In: Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, Berlin, 9–12 December, p. 252. New York: IEEE.

22.

Tisue

Wilensky

(2004) NetLogo: design and implementation of a multi-agent modeling environment. In: Proceedings of agent, pp. 7–9. Available at: https://ccl.northwestern.edu/papers/agent2004.pdf

23.

Trentesaux

(2009) Distributed control of production systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22(7): 971–978.

24.

Trentesaux

Prabhu

(2013) Introduction to shopfloor control. In: Cochran

(ed.) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, pp. 1–9.

25.

Trentesaux

Pach

Bekrar

. (2013) Benchmarking flexible job-shop scheduling and control systems. Control Engineering Practice 21(9): 1204–1225.

26.

Valckenaers

Cavalieri

Saint Germain

. (2006) A benchmarking service for the manufacturing control research community. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(6): 667–679.

27.

Visual Component (2014) Available at: http://www.visualcomponents.com/ (accessed 7 October 2014).

28.

Wagner

Luder

Hausner

. (2010) Engineering processes for decentralized factory automation systems. INTECH Open Access Publisher. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/source/pdfs/10818/InTech-Engineering_processes_for_decentralized_factory_automation_systems.pdf

29.

Wiendahl

H-P

ElMaraghy

Nyhuis

. (2007) Changeable manufacturing-classification, design and operation. CIRP Annals: Manufacturing Technology 56(2): 783–809.