An Approach to Measuring Coupled Tasks Strength and Sequencing of Coupled Tasks in New Product Development

Abstract

To manage a new product development process is difficult because of the coupled tasks. Design structure matrix (DSM) is an effective tool to resolve this problem. The early research on DSM describes the task's relationships by Boolean sign, and the focus of further research is how to measure the coupled strength and how to sequence the coupled tasks module. Based on the existent research, we construct a new method to measure the coupled strength and to calculate the first iteration's gross workload of a different sequence of coupled tasks, thereby ascertaining the best sequence of coupled tasks. The method is illuminated by an example of a mechanical product design process, whose result suggests that the method can be manipulated in the real development process of a new product easily, and it overcomes the disadvantage of the existent research on measuring coupled strength subjectively.

Keywords

new product development coupled tasks strength coupled tasks sequence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yassine, Ali and Braha, Dan (2003). Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method , Concurrent Engineering, 11: 165–176 .

Eppinger, Steven D. (1991). Model-based Approaches to Managing Concurrent Engineering , Journal of Engineering Design, 2(3): 283–290 .

Andrew, Kusiak and Wang, J. (1993). Efficient Organizing of Design Activities , International Journal of Production Research, 31(4): 753–769 .

Ford, David N. and Sterman, John D. (2003). Overcoming the 90% Syndrome: Iteration Management in Concurrent Development Projects , Concurrent Engineering, 11: 177–186 .

Steward, D.V. (1981). The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex System, IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management, August, 71–74.

Andrew, Kusiak and Kwangho, Park (1990). Concurrent Engineering: Decomposition and Scheduling of Design Activities , International Journal of Production Research, 28(10): 1883–1900 .

Tang, D. , Zheng, L. , Li, Z. , Li, D. and Zhang, S. (2000). Re-engineering of the Design Process for Concurrent Engineering , Comput. Ind. Eng., 38: 479–491 .

Eppinger, Steven D. (1997). A Planning Method for Integration of Large-Scale Engineering Systems , In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design ICED —97, Tampere, August 19–21.

Smith, Robert P. and Eppinger, Steven D. (1997b). A Predictive Model of Sequential Iteration in Engineering Design , Management Science, 43: 1104–1120 .

10.

Smith, Robert P. and Eppinger, Steven D. (1998). Deciding Between Sequential and Parallel Tasks in Engineering Design , Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 6: 15–25 .

11.

Browning, Tyson R. (1998). Use of Dependency Structure Matrices for Product Development Cycle Time Reduction , In: Proceedings of the Fifth ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Tokyo, Japan, July 15–17, pp. 89–96 .

12.

Browning, T.R. (2001). Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions , IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3): 292–306 .

13.

Khoo, Li Pheng , Chen, Chun-Hsien and Jiao, Limin (2003). A Dynamic Fuzzy Decision Support Scheme for Concurrent Design Planning , Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11: 279–289 .

14.

Chen, Chun-Hsien , Ling, Shih Fu and Chen, Wei (2003). Project Scheduling for Collaborative Product Development using DSM , International Journal of Project Management, 21: 291–299 .

15.

Lee, S.G. , Ong, K.L. and Khoo, L.P. (2004). Control and Monitoring of Concurrent Design Tasks in a Dynamic Environment , Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 12: 59–66 .

16.

Yassine, A.A. , Whitney, D.E. and Zambito, T. (2001). Assessment of Rework Probabilities for Simulating Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix , In: Proceedings of the DETC 01: ASME 2001 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, PA.

17.

Shi-Jie, Chen , Li Linb (2003). Decomposition of Interdependent Task Group for Concurrent Engineering , Computers & Industrial Engineering, 44: 435–459 .