This study examined the patient perspective of surgical success through the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), in order to identify the patient characteristics and process issues associated with postoperative changes in health status. Patients completed the RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) prior to surgery and at 6 months following surgery. Baseline patient demographic and clinical information were collected from the medical record and were used to develop models of change in HRQOL for 68 patients. While many patients improved, a number experienced no change or even a decline in HRQOL in the postoperative period. Factors associated with change in HRQOL are presented. The findings suggest that factors associated with change in health status can be systematically assessed, which may lead to the development of interventions aimed at those patient characteristics or process issues that impact on HRQOL.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Friedman B, Elixhauser A. Increased use of an expensive, elective procedure: total hip replacements in the 1980's. Med Care1993;7:581-599.
William JI, Naylor CD. Hip and Knee Replacements in Ontario. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario; 1993. Patterns of Health Care in Ontario, No. 5.
4.
Gogia PP, Christensen CM, Schmidt C. Total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: improvement in pain and functional status. Orthopedics1994;17:145-150.
5.
Braeken AM, Lochhaas-Gerlach JA, Gollish JD, et al.Determinants of functional status and pain after elective total hip replacement. Int J Qual Health Care1997;9:413-418.
6.
Kirwan JR, Currey HLF, Freeman MAR, et al.Overall long-term impact of total hip and knee replacement surgery on patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol1994;33:357-360.
7.
Towheed TE, Hochberg MC. Health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Semin Arthritis Rheum1996;26:483-491.
8.
Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al.Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. J Am Med Assoc1989;267:907-913.
9.
MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ, et al.Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res1996;31:623-638.
10.
Donabedian A. The quality of medical care: methods for assessing and monitoring the quality of care for research and for quality assurance programs. Science1978;200:856-864.
11.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-form Health Survey (SF-36). 1) Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care1992;30:473-483.
12.
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): 2) Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care1993;31:247-263.
13.
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JFR, et al.The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): 3) Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care1994;32:40-66.
14.
Greenfield S, Nelson EC. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care1992;30(suppl 5):MS23-MS41.
15.
Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr.Measuring Functioning and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992.
16.
Baker DW, Hays RD, Brook RH. Understanding changes in health status: is the floor phenomenon merely the last step of the staircase?Med Care1997;35:1-15.
17.
Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, et al.Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and functional status after knee replacement. Med Care1995;33(suppl 1):AS131-AS144.
18.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al.A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Disabil1987;40:373-383.
19.
American Society of Anesthesiologists. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification Systems. Lutherville, MD: Maryland Hospital Education Institute, 1990.
20.
Liang MH, Larson MG, Cullen KE, et al.Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status measures for arthritis research. Arthritis Rheum1985;28:542-547.
