Recently, the Veterans Administration (VA) Under Secretary for Health has designated functional status as one of the domains of value for the system, given its increasing importance for clinical care. The Veterans Health Study (VHS) was designed to assist the VA in monitoring outcomes and measuring the case mix of patients who use the VA. The Veterans SF-36 (short form functional status assessment for veterans) was administered to 2425 veterans receiving ambulatory care. Measures of the Veterans SF-36 were strongly correlated with sociodemographics and morbidities of the veterans. Young veterans had poorer mental health status than older veterans. Veterans who used ambulatory care in the VHS reported lower levels of health status, reflecting more disease than a non-VA civilian population. These measures of health are important indicators of the disease burden or case mix of the patients and are pertinent to health systems such as the VA for resource allocation decisions and as outcomes of care.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Epstein A. Performance reports on quality, prototypes, problems, and prospects. N Engl J Med1995;333:57-61.
2.
Ellwood P. Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med1988;318:1549-1556.
3.
Kassirer JP. The next transformation in the delivery of health care (editorial). N Engl J Med1995;332:52-54.
4.
Greenfield S, Nelson EC. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care1992;30:MS23-MS41.
5.
Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy. New York: Oxford Press, 1993.
6.
Paralyzed Veterans of America. The VA Responsibility in Tomorrow's Health Care System: Strategy 2000. Paralyzed Veterans of America, 1993.
7.
Randall M, Kilpatrick KE, Pendergast JF, et al.Differences in patient characteristics between veterans administration and community hospitals: implications for VA planning. Med Care1987;25:1099-1110.
8.
Wolinsky FD, Coe RM, Mosely RR, et al.Veterans and nonveterans use of health services: a comparative analysis. Med Care1985;23:1358-1371.
9.
Kazis L, Miller DR, Clark J, et al.Health related quality of life in veterans: The Veterans Health Study: Technical Report (White Paper to the Department of Veterans Affairs). Washington, DC: Health Services Research and Development Service, 1996.
10.
Kazis LE, Miller DR, Clark J, et al.Health related quality of life in patients served by the Department of Veterans Affairs: results from the Veterans Health Study. Arch Intern Med1998; 158:626-632.
11.
Brook RH, Ware JE, Rogers WH, et al.Does free care improve adults' health?New Engl J Med1983;309:1426-1434.
12.
Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, et al.The Medical Outcomes Study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAIA1989;262:925-930.
13.
Kazis LE, Miller DR, Clark J, et al.A modified version of a short form health survey for assessing health related quality of life in veterans: the Veterans Health study. Presented at Association for Health Services Research Meeting; June 12, 1994; San Diego, Calif.
14.
Kazis LE, Miller DR, Clark J, et al.Improving the response choices on the SF-36 role functioning scales (SF-36V): results from the Veterans Health Study. In press.
15.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care1992;30:473-483.
16.
Kazis LE, Wilson N. Health Status of Veterans: Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores (SF-36V): 1996 National Survey of Ambulatory Care Patients, Executive Report. Washington DC and Bedford, Massachusetts: Office of Performance and Quality, and Health Assessment Project, Health Services Research and Development Service, 1997.
17.
McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): II. psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care1993;31: 247-263.
18.
Kravitz RL, Greenfield S, Rogers WH, et al.Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA1992;267: 1617-1623.
19.
Lincoln E, Skinner K, Miller D, et al.Clinical relevance ofpatient questionnaires for screening comparison with medical records. Abstract presented at annual meeting of Society of General Internal Medicine; March 6, 1993; Atlanta, Ga.
20.
Skinner K, Lincoln E, Kazis L, et al.Patient based screening questionnaires. Abstract presented at annual meeting of Gerontology Society of America; November 19, 1993; New Orleans, La.
21.
Linzer M, Pierce C, Lincoln E, et al.Preliminary validation of a patient based self-assessment measure of severity of illness in diabetes: results from the Veterans Health Study. Abstract presented at annual meeting of Society of General Internal Medicine; April 28, 1995; Washington, DC.
22.
Rost K, Burnam MA, Smith GR, et al.Development of screeners for depressive disorders and substance disorder history. Med Care1993;31:189-200.
23.
Magruder-Habib K, Stevens HA, Alling WC. Relative performance of the MAST, VAST and CAGE versus DSM-III-R criteria for alcohol dependence. J Clin Epidemiol1993;46:435-441.
24.
Kazis LE, Skinner K, Miller D, et al.Quality of life for the chronically ill elderly. In: Romeis JC, Coe RM, Morley JE, eds. Applying Health Services Research to Long-Term Care. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc., 1996: 43-75.
25.
Hays RD, Wells KB, Sherbourne CD, et al.Functioning and well-being outcomes of patients with depression compared with chronic general medical illnesses. Arch Gen Psychiatry1995;52: 11-19.
26.
Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. The Health Institute, Boston, Mass., 1993.
27.
Hornbrook MC, Goodman MJ. Assessing relative health plan risk with the Rand-36 health survey. Inquiry1995;32: 56-74.
28.
Rogers WH, Kazis LE, Miller D, Skinner K, et al.Large differences in health status between VA and non-VA ambulatory patients: a comparison of The Veterans Health and Medical Outcomes Studies. Abstract presented at the Association for Health Services Research Annual Meeting; Chicago, Ill.; June 6, 1995.
29.
National Center for Veteran Analysis and Statistics, Department of Veterans Affairs. National Survey of Veterans (IV). (Publication NSV9503). Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, 1995.
30.
Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, et al.Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA1989;262:907-913.
31.
Kizer K. Functional Status: Fifth Domain of Value. (Official VA Memorandum). Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, March 12, 1997.
32.
Kazis LE, Wilson N. Health Status and Outcomes of Veterans: Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores (SF-36V): 1998 National Survey of Ambulatory Care Patients, Mid-Year Executive Report. Washington, DC and Bedford, Mass.: Office of Performance and Quality and Health Assessment Project, Health Services Research and Development Service,1998.
