One factor that affects surgical team performance is unprofessional behavior exhibited by the surgeon, which may be observed by patients and families and reported to health care organizations in the form of spontaneous complaints. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between patient complaints and adverse surgical outcomes. A retrospective cohort study used American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from an academic medical center and included 10 536 patients with surgical procedures performed by 66 general and vascular surgeons. The number of complaints for a surgeon was correlated with surgical occurrences (P < .01). Surgeons with more patient complaints had a greater rate of surgical occurrences if the surgeon’s aggregate preoperative risk was higher (β = .25, P < .05), whereas there was no statistically significant relationship between patient complaints and surgical occurrences for surgeons with lower aggregate perioperative risk (β = −.20, P = .77).
MitchellPWyniaMGoldenR. Core Principles & Values of Effective Team-based Health Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2012.
2.
MazzoccoKPetittiDBFongKT. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197:678-685.
3.
SextonJBPaineLAManfusoJ. A check-up for safety culture in “my patient care area.”Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:699-703.
4.
MakaryMASextonJBFreischlagJA. Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:746-752.
5.
HicksonGBMooreINPichertJWBenegasMJr. Balancing systems and individual accountability in a safety culture. In: BermanS, ed. From the Front Office to the Front Line: Essential Issues for Healthcare Leaders. 2nd ed.Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources, Inc.; 2012:1-36.
6.
MoranSKSicherCM. Interprofessional jousting and medical tragedies: strategies for enhancing professional relations. AANA J. 1996;64:521-524.
7.
CatchpoleKMishraAHandaAMcCullochP. Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg. 2008;247:699-706.
8.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Sentinel Events: Behaviors That Undermine a Culture of Safety. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2008.
9.
MishraACatchpoleKDaleTMcCullochP. The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:68-73.
10.
ShouhedDGewertzBWiegmannDCatchpoleK. Integrating human factors research and surgery: a review. Arch Surg. 2012;147:1141-1146.
11.
AllsopJ. Two sides to every story: complainants’ and doctors’ perspectives in disputes about medical care in a general practice setting. Law Policy. 1994;16:149-183.
12.
CydulkaRKTamayo-SarverJGageABagnoliD. Association of patient satisfaction with complaints and risk management among emergency physicians. J Emerg Med. 2011;41:405-411.
13.
FullamFGarmanANJohnsonTJHedbergEC. The use of patient satisfaction surveys and alternative coding procedures to predict malpractice risk. Med Care. 2009;47:553-559.
14.
HicksonGBFederspielCFBlackfordJ. Patient complaints and malpractice risk in a regional healthcare center. South Med J. 2007;100:791-796.
15.
HicksonGBFederspielCFPichertJWMillerCSGauld-JaegerJBostP. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2002;287:2951-2957.
16.
Levtzion-KorachOFrankelAAlcalaiH. Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:402-410.
17.
MooreINPichertJWHicksonGBFederspielCBlackfordJU. Rethinking peer review: detecting and addressing medical malpractice claims risk. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2006;59:1175-1206.
18.
MukherjeeKPichertJWCornettMBYanGHicksonGWDiazJJJr.All trauma surgeons are not created equal: asymmetric distribution of malpractice claims risk. J Trauma. 2010;69:549-554.
19.
StelfoxHTGandhiTKOravEJGustafsonML. The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. Am J Med. 2005;118:1126-1133.
20.
StimsonCJPichertJWMooreIN. Medical malpractice claims risk in urology: an empirical analysis of patient complaint data. J Urol. 2010;183:1971-1976.
21.
GuillamondeguiODGunterOLHinesL. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:709-714.
22.
HicksonGBPichertJWFederspielCFClaytonEW. Development of an early identification and response model of malpractice prevention. Law Contemp Probl. 1997;60(1-2):7-29.
23.
SloanFAMergenhagenPMBurfieldWBBovbjergRRHassanM. Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard?JAMA. 1989;262:3291-3297.
24.
VincentCDavisR. Patients and families as safety experts. CMAJ. 2012;184:15-16.
25.
FinkASCampbellDAMentzerRM. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236:344-354.
American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). User Guide for the 2011 Participant Use Data File. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2012:3-6, 25-26, 33.
29.
HicksonGBClaytonEWEntmanSS. Obstetricians’ prior malpractice experience and patients’ satisfaction with care. JAMA. 1994;272:1583-1587.
30.
PichertJWHicksonGMooreI. Using patient complaints to promote patient safety. In: HenriksenKBattlesJBKeyesMAGradyML, eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
31.
PichertJWMooreINKarrassJ. An intervention model that promotes accountability: peer messengers and patient/family complaints. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:435-446.
32.
MurffHJFranceDJBlackfordJ. Relationship between patient complaints and surgical complications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:13-16.
33.
AikenLSWestSG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991.
34.
FelpsWMitchellTRByingtonE. How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. In: StawBM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2006:175-222.
35.
GreeneJHibbardJH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:520-526.
36.
ReiterCEPichertJWHicksonGB. Addressing behavior and performance issues that threaten quality and patient safety: what your attorneys want you to know. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:37-45.
37.
PichertJJohnsJAHicksonGB. Professionalism in support of pediatric cardio-thoracic surgery: a case of a bright young surgeon. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2011;32:89-96.
38.
HicksonGBClaytonEWMillerCSPichertJWEntmanSS. Satisfaction with obstetric care: relation to neonatal intensive care. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:288-292.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
