This article describes the interventions that sustained low central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in the Michigan Keystone ICU Project. This analysis included data from March 2004 to December 2013 for 121 intensive care units (ICUs) in 73 hospitals. The Keystone Project was a cohort collaborative with an improvement team in each ICU. During the sustainability period, teams integrated the intervention into staff orientation, collected and submitted monthly data, and reported infection rates to leaders. The annual mean rate of BSIs dropped from 2.5 infections/1000 catheter-days in 2004 to 0.76 in 2013. A subset analysis found nearly double the percentage of ICUs with a mean rate of <1 infection/1000 catheter-days in 2013 compared with baseline. Active involvement of hospital leaders and the Keystone Center as well as ongoing monitoring and feedback of performance were important in sustaining results. These findings suggest that large-scale improvement projects can be sustained, establishing a new normal for care.
KlevensRMEdwardsJRRichardsCLJr. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:160-166.
2.
WarrenDKQuadirWWHollenbeakCSElwardAMCoxMJFraserVJ. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2084-2089.
3.
O’GradyNPAlexanderMDellingerEP. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;55:1-29.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: Central line-associated bloodstream infections: United States, 2001, 2008 and 2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:243-248.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections among patients in intensive care units: Pennsylvania, April 2001-March 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:1013-1016.
6.
PronovostPJBerenholtzSMGoeschelC. Improving patient safety in intensive care units in Michigan. J Crit Care. 2008;23:207-221.
7.
SawyerMWeeksKGoeschelCA. Using evidence, rigorous measurement, and collaboration to eliminate central line-associated bloodstream infections. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(8, suppl):S292-S298.
8.
PronovostPNeedhamDBerenholtzS. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2725-2732.
9.
PronovostPJGoeschelCAColantuoniE. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ. 2010;340:c309.
10.
Lipitz-SnydermanASteinwachsDNeedhamDMColantuoniEMorlockLLPronovostPJ. Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d219.
11.
WatersHRKornRJrColantuoniE. The business case for quality: economic analysis of the Michigan Keystone patient safety program in ICUs. Am J Med Qual. 2011;26:333-339.
12.
SextonJBBerenholtzSMGoeschelCA. Assessing and improving safety climate in a large cohort of intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:934-939.
BerenholtzSMLubomskiLHWeeksK. Eliminating central line-associated bloodstream infections: a national patient safety imperative. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:56-62.
15.
PalomarMAlvarez-LermaFRieraA. Impact of a national multimodal intervention to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection in the ICU: the Spanish experience. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2364-2372.
16.
BionJRichardsonAHibbertP. “Matching Michigan”: a 2-year stepped interventional programme to minimise central venous catheter-blood stream infections in intensive care units in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:110-123.
17.
Dixon-WoodsMLeslieMBionJTarrantC. What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program. Milbank Q. 2012;90:548-591.
18.
Dixon-WoodsMLeslieMTarrantCBionJ. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implement Sci. 2013;8:70.
19.
Wiltsey StirmanSKimberlyJCookNCallowayACastroFCharnsM. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:17.
20.
AvelingEMartinGPArmstrongNBanerjeeJDixon-WoodsM. Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26:158-174.
21.
PronovostPJBerenholtzSMNeedhamDM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:963-965.
22.
PronovostPWeastBRosensteinB. Implementing and validating a comprehensive unit-based safety program. J Patient Safety. 2005;1:33-40.
23.
TimmelJKentPSHolzmuellerCGPaineLASchulickRDPronovostPJ. Impact of the comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) on safety culture in a surgical inpatient unit. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:252-260.
24.
MermelLA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:391-402.
25.
BerenholtzSMPronovostPJLipsettPA. Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2014-2020.
26.
BerwickDM. Improving patient care: my right knee. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:121-125.
27.
ScheirerMADearingJW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2059-2067.
28.
DoyleCHoweCWoodcockT. Making change last: applying the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement sustainability model to healthcare improvement. Implement Sci. 2013;8:127.
29.
Dixon-WoodsMBoskCLAvelingEGoeschelCAPronovostPJ. Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q. 2011;89:167-205.
30.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) in Acute Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Hospitals, Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2012.
WomerRBTracyESoo-HooWBickertBDiTarantoSBarnsteinerJH. Multidisciplinary systems approach to chemotherapy safety: rebuilding processes and holding the gains. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4705-4712.
33.
YatesGRHochmanRFSaylesSMStockmeierCA. Sentara Norfolk General Hospital: accelerating improvement by focusing on building a culture of safety. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:534-542.
34.
GustafsonDHSainfortFEichlerMAdamsLBisognanoMSteudelH. Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:751-776.
35.
GreenhalghTRobertGMacfarlaneFBatePKyriakidouO. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581-629.
36.
LyderCHGradyJMathurDPetrilloMKMeehanTP. Preventing pressure ulcers in Connecticut hospitals by using the plan-do-study-act model of quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:205-214.
37.
AlexanderJAWeinerBJMetzgerME. Sustainability of collaborative capacity in community health partnerships. Med Care Res Rev. 2003;60(4, suppl):130S-160S.
38.
TooherRMiddletonPPhamC. A systematic review of strategies to improve prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospitals. Ann Surg. 2005;241:397-415.
39.
Van HerckPDe SmedtDAnnemansLRemmenRRosenthalMBSermeusW. Systematic review: effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:247.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
