Follow-up of abnormal ambulatory laboratory results is often suboptimal. The impact of an ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) on follow-up of markedly elevated blood potassium (K +) results was investigated via a retrospective medical record review—before and after EHR implementation—of patients at an adult primary care practice who had a nonhemolyzed K+ ≥ 6.0 mEq/L. In all, 188 patients in the pre-EHR group and 30 in the EHR group satisfied inclusion criteria. The mean K+ for the 2 groups was 6.3 mEq/L. The EHR group had 4.5 times the odds (95% confidence interval = 1.3-15.8) of having their episodes of hyperkalemia followed up within 4 days. Patients in the EHR group were also more likely to have their blood K+ rechecked within 4 days (63.3% vs 43.6%; P = .044). An ambulatory EHR with a results management system improves documentation and time to follow-up for patients with markedly abnormal lab results.
Hickner J., Graham DG, Elder NC, et al. Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Qual Saf Health Care . 2008;17:194-200.
2.
Plews-Ogan ML , Nadkarni MM, Forren S., et al. Patient safety in the ambulatory setting. A clinician-based approach. J Gen Intern Med.2004;19:719-725.
3.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Patient fact sheet: 20 tips to help prevent medical error . http://www.ahrq.gov/consumer/safety.html.
4.
Lin JJ, Dunn A., Moore C.Follow-up of outpatient test results: a survey of house-staff practices and perceptions. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21:178-184.
5.
Poon EG, Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Murff HJ, Karson AS, Bates DW " I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2223-2228.
6.
Moore C., Saigh O., Trikha A., Lin JJTimely follow-up of abnormal outpatient test results: perceived barriers and impact on patient safety. J Patient Saf. 2008 ;4: 241-244.
7.
Murff HJ, Gandhi TK, Karson AK, et al. Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71:137-149.
8.
Singh H., Naik AD, Rao R., Petersen LAReducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:489-494.
9.
Staes CJ, Evans RS, Rocha BH, et al. Computerized alerts improve outpatient laboratory monitoring of transplant patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:324-332.
10.
Petersen LA , Orav EJ, Teich JM, O’Neil AC, Brennan TAUsing a computerized sign-out program to improve continuity of inpatient care and prevent adverse events. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:77-87.
11.
Kuperman GJ , Teich JM, Tanasijevic MJ, et al. Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6:512-522.
12.
van Wyk JT, van Wijk MA, Sturkenboom MC, Mosseveld M., Moorman PW, van der Lei J.Electronic alerts versus on-demand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation . 2008;117:371-378.
13.
Raebel MA, Charles J., Dugan J., et al. Randomized trial to improve prescribing safety in ambulatory elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:977-985.
14.
Choksi VR, Marn CS, Bell Y., Carlos R.Efficiency of a semi-automated coding and review process for notification of critical findings in diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol . 2006;186:933-936.
15.
Wahls T., Haugen T., Cram P.The continuing problem of missed test results in an integrated health system with an advanced electronic medical record. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:485-492.
16.
Wahls TL, Cram PMThe frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health system. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:32.
17.
Kuperman GJ , Teich JM, Bates DW, et al. Detecting alerts, notifying the physician, and offering action items: a comprehensive alerting system. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp.1996:704-708.
18.
van der Sijs H., Aarts J., Vulto A., Berg M.Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:138-147.
19.
van der Sijs H., Mulder A., van Gelder T., Aarts J., Berg M., Vulto A.Drug safety alert generation and overriding in a large Dutch university medical centre. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:941-947.
20.
Taylor LK, Tamblyn R.Reasons for physician non-adherence to electronic drug alerts. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107:1101-1105.
21.
Singh H., Thomas EJ, Mani S., et al. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential ? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1578-1586.
22.
Acker CG, Johnson JP, Palevsky PM, Greenberg A.Hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients: causes, adequacy of treatment, and results of an attempt to improve physician compliance with published therapy guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:917-924.
23.
Palevsky PM , Bhagrath R., Greenberg A.Hypernatremia in hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:197-203.
24.
Paltiel O., Salakhov E., Ronen I., Berg D., Israeli A.Management of severe hypokalemia in hospitalized patients: a study of quality of care based on computerized databases. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1089-1095.
25.
Polderman KH , Schreuder WO, Strack van Schijndel RJ, Thijs LGHypernatremia in the intensive care unit: an indicator of quality of care?Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1105-1108.
26.
Schepkens H. , Vanholder R., Billiouw JM, Lameire N.Life-threatening hyperkalemia during combined therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and spironolactone: an analysis of 25 cases. Am J Med. 2001;110:438-441.
27.
Reardon LC, Macpherson DSHyperkalemia in outpatients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: how much should we worry? Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:26-32.
28.
Perazella MA , Mahnensmith RLHyperkalemia in the elderly: drugs exacerbate impaired potassium homeostasis. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:646-656.
29.
Juurlink DN , Mamdani MM, Lee DS, et al. Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study. N Engl J Med . 2004;351:543-551.
30.
Blake J., Devereux RBDifferential effects of direct antagonism of AII compared to ACE inhibitors on serum potassium levels and azotemia in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2000;6:193-196.
31.
Moore CR, Lin JJ, O’Connor N., Halm EAFollow-up of markedly elevated serum potassium results in the ambulatory setting: implications for patient safety. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21:115-124.
32.
Moore C., Lin J., McGinn T., Halm E.Factors associated with time to follow-up of severe hyperkalemia in the ambulatory setting. Am J Med Qual. 2007;22:428-437.
33.
Reasons J.Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
34.
Kravitz RL, Rolph JE, Petersen L.Omission-related malpractice claims and the limits of defensive medicine. Med Care Res Rev. 1997;54:456-471.
35.
Poon EG, Haas JS, Louise Puopolo A., et al. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms . J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:316-323.
