Despite its importance, the objective impact of clinical peer review on the quality and safety of care has not been studied. Data from 296 acute care hospitals show that peer review program and related organizational factors can explain up to 18% of the variation in standardized measures of quality and patient safety. The majority of programs rely on an outmoded and dysfunctional process model. Adoption of best practices informed by the continuing study of peer review program effectiveness has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes.
Vitez TSA model for quality assurance in anesthesiology. J Clin Anesth . 1990;2:280-287.
2.
Graber MLPhysician participation in quality management: expanding the goals of peer review to detect both practitioner and system error. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999;25:396-407.
3.
Olcott C. IV , Mitchell RS, Steinberg GK, Zarins CKInstitutional peer review can reduce the risk and cost of carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:939-942.
4.
Antonacci AC , Lam A., Lavarias V., Homel P., Eavey RAA report card system using error profile analysis and concurrent morbidity and mortality review: surgical outcome analysis, part II. J Surg Res. 2009;153:95-104.
5.
Edwards MT, Benjamin EMThe process of peer review in US hospitals. J Clin Outcomes Manag.2009;16(5):461-467.
6.
Edwards MTPeer review: a new tool for quality improvement. Phys Exec . 2009;35:54-59.
7.
Goldman RLThe reliability of peer assessments: a meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof. 1994;17:3-21.
8.
Sanazaro PJ, Mills DHA critique of the use of generic screening in quality assessment. JAMA. 1991;265:1977-1981.
9.
Berwick DMPeer review and quality management: are they compatible? QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990;16:246-251.
10.
Dans PEClinical peer review: burnishing a tarnished image. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:566-568.
US General Accounting Office.National practitioner data bank: major improvements are needed to enhance data bank’s reliability. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01130.pdf . Accessed August 4, 2010.
13.
Ajlouni KM, Al-Khalidi U.Medical records, patients outcome, and peer review in eleventh-century Arab medicine. Ann Saudi Med. 1997;17:326-327.
14.
Codman EAA Study in Hospital Efficiency. Boston, MA: T Todd; 1917.
15.
Ponton TRGauging efficiency of hospital and its staff. Mod Hosp. 1928;31:64-68.
16.
Lembbcke PAEvolution of the medical audit. JAMA. 1967;199:111-118.
17.
Butler JJ, Quinlan JWInternal audit in the department of medicine of a community hospital: two years’ experience. JAMA. 1958;167:567-572.
18.
Edwards MTClinical peer review program self-evaluation for US hospitals. [published online ahead of print August 23, 2010]. Am J Med Qual. doi: 10.1177/1062860610371224.
19.
Griffith JR , Pattullo A., Alexander JA, Jelinek RC, Foster DAIs anybody managing the store? National trends in hospital performance. J Healthc Manag. 2006;51: 392-406.
20.
Pauly MV, Brailer DJ, Kroch G., Even-Shoshan O.Measuring hospital outcomes from a buyer’s perspective. Am J Med Qual. 1996;11:112-122.
21.
HealthGrades.The twelfth annual HealthGrades Hospital Quality in America study. http://www.healthgrades.com/media/DMS/pdf/HealthGradesTwelfthAnnualHospitalQualityStudy2009.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2010.
22.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Guide to patient safety indicators. Version3.1. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/downloads/psi/psi_guide_v31.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2010.
23.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.Hospital compare. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HospitalQualityInits/11_HospitalCompare.asp#TopOfPage. Accessed October 27, 2009.
24.
Streiner DL, Norman GRHealth Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.
25.
Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rouseau DM, et al. The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference? Med Care. 1994;32:508-525.
QA to QI Consulting.Normative peer review database project. www.qatoqi.com/proj_normative_database.htm . Accessed August 4, 2010.
28.
Bradley EH, Holomboe ES, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HMThe roles of senior management in quality improvement efforts: what are the key components? J Healthc Manag. 2003;48:15-29.
29.
Keroack MA, Younberg BJ, Cerese JL, Krsek C., Prellwitz LW, Trevelyan EWOrganizational factors associated with high performance in quality and safety in academic medical centers. Acad Med. 2007 ;82:1178-1186.
30.
Vaughn T., Koepke M., Kroch E., Lehrman W., Sinha S., Levey S.Engagement of leadership in quality improvement initiatives: executive quality improvement survey results. J Patient Saf. 2006;2:2-9.
31.
Kroch E., Vaughn T., Keopke M., et al. Hospital boards and quality dashboards. J Patient Saf. 2006;2:10-19.
32.
Seago JA, Benroth R., McDougall B., Fernandez M., Giberson A., Daniel P.Comprehensive Study of Peer Review in California: Final Report. San Francisco, CA: Lumetra;2008 .
33.
Dershewitz RA, Gross RJWhy medical audits are in disfavor. Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:168-169.
34.
Rubin HR, Rogers WH, Kahn KL, Rubenstein LV, Brook RHWatching the doctor-watchers: how well do peer review organization methods detect hospital care quality problems? JAMA. 1992;267:2349-2354.
